1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Petroleum Geoscience
  4. Volume 22, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1354-0793
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Studies of oil reservoirs show that unconformities may occur between the reservoir and the caprock. At the boundary where the unconformity occurs, there may be a layer of higher permeability compared to the caprock. Such traps may occur at CO storage sites and, therefore, their effect should be investigated. In this work, we simulate CO storage beneath angular unconformities, where sandstone layers have been tilted and eroded prior to the deposition of a caprock. After preliminary studies into the effect of gridding such traps, we describe simulations of a range of 2D and 3D models. The results reveal that migration of CO is influenced by the lithology beneath the unconformity, which could have been modified by weathering or diagenesis. This can have both positive and negative effects on the CO storage capacity and security. It shows that an unconformity model that has a layer of high permeability at the interface between the aquifer and the caprock, as a result of weathering or diagenesis, can contribute to pressure diffusion across the reservoir. This could improve CO sequestration by providing pathways for CO migration to access other parts of the storage complex. However, this could also have a negative effect on the security of CO storage by providing pathways for CO to migrate out of the storage formation and so increase the risk of CO leakage.

© 2016 The Author(s)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2015-039
2016-04-12
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2015-039
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archer, J.S. & Wall, C.G.
    2012. Petroleum Engineering: Principles and Practice.Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bentham, M., Mallows, T., Lowndes, J. & Green, A.
    2014. CO2 STORage Evaluation Database (CO2 Stored), the UK's online storage database. Energy Procedia, 63, 5103–5113.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Besly, B.M., Burley, S.D. & Turner, P.
    1993. The late Carboniferous ‘Barren Red Bed’ play of the Southern North Sea. In: Parker, J.R. (ed.) Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 4th Conference, Volume 1. Geological Society, London, 727–740, http://dx.doi.org//10.1144/0040727
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biddle, K.T. & Wielchowsky, C.C.
    1994. Hydrocarbon traps. In: Magoon, L.B. & Dow, W. (eds) The Petroleum System – From Source To Trap.American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoirs, 60, 219–219.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruant, R., Guswa, A., Celia, M. & Peters, C.
    2002. Safe Storage of CO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers. Environmental Science and Technology Washington, 36, 240A–245A.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Hu, W., Yao, S., Wang, X., Zhang, Y. & Tang, Y.
    2005. The Permian hybrid petroleum system in the northwest margin of the Junggar Basin, northwest China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 22, 331–349.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Celia, M.A., Peters, C.A. & Bachu, S.
    2002. Geologic storage of CO2: leakage pathways and environmental risks. In: American Geophysical Union 2002 Spring Meeting, Washington, DC, Volume 1. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, AbstractGC32A-03.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chadwick, R.A. & Noy, D.J.
    2010. History-matching flow simulations and time-lapse seismic data from the Sleipner CO2 plume. In: Vining, B.A. & Pickering, S.C. (eds) Petroleum Geology: From Mature Basins to New Frontiers – Proceedings of the 7th Petroleum Geology Conference, Volume 2. Geological Society, London, 1171–1182, http://dx.doi.org//10.1144/0071171
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chadwick, A., Arts, R., Bernstone, C., May, F., Thibeau, S. & Zweigel, P.
    2008. Best Practice for the Storage of CO2 in Saline Aquifers – Observations and Guidelines from the SACS and CO2STORE Projects.British Geological Survey, Occasional Publications, 14.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunbar, C.O. & Rogers, J.
    1957. Principles of Stratigraphy.Wiley, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Emami-Meybodi, H., Hassanzadeh, H., Green, C.P. & Ennis-King, J.
    2015. Convective dissolution of CO2 in saline aquifers: Progress in modeling and experiments. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 238–266.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fengjun, N., Sitian, L., Hua, W., Xinong, X., Keqiang, W. & Meizhu, J.
    2001. Lateral migration pathways of petroleum in the Zhu III subbasin, Pearl River Mouth basin, South China Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 18, 561–575.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Firoozabadi, A. & Cheng, P.
    2010. Prospects for subsurface CO2 sequestration. AlChE Journal, 56, 1398–1405.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Flett, M., Gurton, R. & Weir, G.
    2007. Heterogeneous saline formations for carbon dioxide disposal: Impact of varying heterogeneity on containment and trapping. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 57, 106–118.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Goater, A., Bijeljic, B. & Blunt, M.J.
    2013. Dipping open aquifers—The effect of top-surface topography and heterogeneity on CO2 storage efficiency. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17, 318–331.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gunter, W.D., Wong, S., Cheel, D.B. & Sjostrom, G.
    1998. Large CO2 sinks: Their role in the mitigation of greenhouse gases from an international, national (Canadian) and provincial (Alberta) perspective. Applied Energy, 61, 209–227.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. IPCC
    IPCC. 2005. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Special Report, Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Summary for Policymakers.IPCC, Montreal.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Juanes, R., Spiteri, E.J., Orr, F.M. & Blunt, M.J.
    2006. Impact of relative permeability hysteresis on geological CO2 storage. Water Resources Research, 42, W12418, http://dx.doi.org//10.1029/2005WR004806
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Newell, A.J. & Shariatipour, S.M.
    2016. Linking outcrop analogue with flow simulation to reduce uncertainty in sub-surface carbon capture and storage: an example from the Sherwood Sandstone Group of the Wessex Basin, UK. In: Bowman, M., Smyth, H.R., Good, T.R., Passey, S.R., Hirst, J.P.P. & Jordan, C.J. (eds) The Value of Outcrop Studies in Reducing Subsurface Uncertainty and Risk in Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production.Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 436. First published online January 13, 2016, http://doi.org/10.1144/SP436.2
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nilsen, H.M., Syversveen, A.R., Lie, K.-A., Tveranger, J. & Nordbotten, J.M.
    2012. Impact of top-surface morphology on CO2 storage capacity. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 11, 221–235.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Orr, F.M., Jr
    . 2009. Onshore geologic storage of CO2 . Science, 325, 1656–1658.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ritenhouse, G.
    1972. Stratigraphic-trap classification. In: King, R.E. (ed.) Stratigraphic Oil and Gas Fields: Classification, Exploration Methods, and Case Histories.American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoirs, 16, 14–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Rogers, J.N., Kelley, J.T., Belknap, D.F., Gontz, A. & Barnhardt, W.A.
    2006. Shallow-water pockmark formation in temperate estuaries: a consideration of origins in the western gulf of Maine with special focus on Belfast Bay. Marine Geology, 225, 45–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. SCCS
    SCCS. 2009. Opportunities for CO2 Storage Around Scotland – An Integrated Strategic Research Study.Scottish Carbon Capture & Storage, Edinburgh. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/270737/0080597.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Shariatipour, S.M., Pickup, G.E., Mackay, E.J. & Stow, D.A.V.
    2012. The Effects of Aquifer/Caprock Interface on CO2 Storage Capacity and Security.3rd EAGE CO2 Geological Storage Workshop, Edinburgh, 25–26 March.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Shariatipour, S.M., Pickup, G.E. & Mackay, E.J.
    2014. The Effect of Aquifer/Caprock Interface on Geological Storage of CO2 . Energy Procedia, 63, 5544–5555.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Sloss, L.L.
    1963. Sequences in the cratonic interior of North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 74, 93–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith, M., Campbell, D., Mackay, E.J. & Polson, D.
    2012. CO2 Aquifer Storage Site Evaluation and Monitoring.SCCS, Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Spycher, N.F. & Pruess, K.
    2005. CO2-H2O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO2. II. Partitioning in chloride brines at 12–100°C and up to 600 bars. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69, 3309–3320.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Swierczek, M.
    2012. Role of unconformities in controlling clastic reservoir properties insights from adopting a multidisciplinary approach. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Edinburgh.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Whittaker, S.G.
    2004. Investigating geological storage of greenhouse gases in southeastern Saskatchewan: The IEA Weyburn CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project. In: Summary of Investigations 2004, Volume 1. Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Industry Resources, Miscellaneous Report, 2004-4.1, Paper A-2.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2015-039
Loading
Investigation of CO2 storage in a saline formation with an angular unconformity at the caprock interface
Petroleum Geoscience 22, 203 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2015-039
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2015-039
/content/journals/10.1144/petgeo2015-039
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error