A texture‐based region growing algorithm for volume extraction in seismic data

References

1. BerthelotA., SolbergA.H.S., MorisbakE. and GeliusL.‐J.2011. Salt diapirs without well defined boundaries—a feasibility study of semi‐automatic detection. Geophysical Prospecting59, 682–696.
   [Google Scholar]
2. CohenI., CoultN. and VassiliouA.A.2006. Detection and extraction of fault surfaces in 3D seismic data. Geophysics71, P21–P27.
   [Google Scholar]
3. DumayJ. and FournierF.1988. Multivariate statistical analyses applied to seismic facies recognition. Geophysics53, 1151–1159.
   [Google Scholar]
4. GaoD.2003. Volume texture extraction for 3D seismic visualization and interpretation. Geophysics68, 1294–1302.
   [Google Scholar]
5. GaoD.2004. Texture model regression for effective feature discrimination: application to seismic facies visualization and interpretation. Geophysics69, 958–967.
   [Google Scholar]
6. HollandJ.H.1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Michigan, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
7. JacqueminP. and MalletJ.L.2005. Automatic faults extraction using double Hough transform. 75th SEG meeting, Houston, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 755–758.
8. KösterK. and SpannM.1999. Unsupervised segmentation of 3D and 2D seismic reflection data. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence13, 643–663.
   [Google Scholar]
9. KrahenbuhlR.A. and LiY.2009. Hybrid optimization for lithologic inversion and time‐lapse monitoring using a binary formulation. Geophysics74, I55–I65.
   [Google Scholar]
10. LomaskJ., ClappR.G. and BiondiB.2007. Application of image segmentation to tracking 3D salt boundaries. Geophysics72, P47–P56.
    [Google Scholar]
11. LoveP.L. and SimaanM.1985. Segmentation of a seismic section using image processing and artificial intelligence techniques. Pattern Recognition18, 409–419.
    [Google Scholar]
12. NgI., KittlerJ. and IllingworthJ.1993. Supervised segmentation using a multiresolution data representation. Signal Processing31, 133–163.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Orozco‐del‐CastilloM.G., Ortiz‐AlemánC., MartinR., Ávila‐CarreraR. and Rodríguez‐CastellanosA.2011a. Seismic data interpretation using the Hough transform and principal component analysis. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering8, 61–73.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Orozco‐del‐CastilloM.G., Ortiz‐AlemánC., Urrutia‐FucugauchiJ., MartinR., Rodríguez‐CastellanosA. and Villaseñor‐RojasP.E.2013. A genetic algorithm for filter design to enhance features in seismic images. Geophysical Prospecting62, 210–222.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Orozco‐del‐CastilloM.G., Ortiz‐AlemánC., Urrutia‐FucugauchiJ. and Rodríguez‐CastellanosA.2011b. Fuzzy logic and image processing techniques for the interpretation of seismic data. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering8, 185–194.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Rodríguez‐ZúñigaJ.L., Ortiz‐AlemánC., PadillaG. and GaulonR.1997. Application of genetic algorithms to constrain shallow elastic parameters using in situ ground inclination measurements. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering16, 223–234.
    [Google Scholar]
17. ShenX., SpannM. and NackenP.1998. Segmentation of 2D and 3D images through a hierarchical clustering based on region modelling. Pattern Recognition31, 1295–1309.
    [Google Scholar]
18. SimaanM.1991. Knowledge‐based computer system for segmentation of seismic sections based on texture. 61st SEG meeting, Houston, Texas, Expanded Abstracts.
19. TurkM. and PentlandA.1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience3, 71–86.
    [Google Scholar]
20. WestB.P., MayS.R., EastwoodJ.E. and RossenC.2002. Interactive seismic facies classification using textural attributes and neural networks. The Leading Edge21, 1042–1049.
    [Google Scholar]
21. ZengH.2004. Seismic geomorphology‐based facies classification. The Leading Edge23, 644–688.
    [Google Scholar]