1887
Volume 64 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

P‐wave‐to‐S‐wave ratios are important seismic characterization attributes. Velocity ratios are sensitive to the petrophysical properties of rocks and to the presence of gas. Attenuation ratios have also been shown to be sensitive to the presence of partial liquid/gas saturation. The relationship between liquid/gas saturation and P‐wave and S‐wave ratios has been used to distinguish gas‐saturated rocks from liquid‐saturated rocks. Aligned fractures are common in the Earth's crust and cause seismic anisotropy and shear wave splitting. However, most existing relationships between partial gas/liquid saturation and P‐wave and S‐wave ratios are for non‐fractured rocks. We present experimental results comparing the effects of changing water saturation on / versus / ratios between a non‐fractured rock and one containing fractures aligned parallel to wave propagation direction. We also study the effects of aligned fractures on the response of / to changing water saturation using synthetic fractured sandstones with fractures aligned at 45o and parallel to the wave propagation direction. The results suggest that aligned fractures could have significant effects on the observed trends, some of which may not be obvious. Fractures aligned parallel to wave propagation could change the response of / versus / ratios to water saturation from previously reported trends. Shear wave splitting due to the presence of aligned fractures results in two velocity ratios (/ and /). The fluid independence of shear wave splitting for fractures aligned parallel to wave propagation direction means the difference between / and / is independent of water saturation. For fractures aligned at oblique angles, shear wave splitting can be sensitive to water saturation and consequently be frequency dependent, which can lead to fluid and frequency‐dependent differences between / and /. The effect of aligned fractures on / ratios not only depends on the fracture effects on both P‐wave and S‐wave velocities but also on the effects of water saturation distribution on the rock and fracture stiffness, and hence on the P‐wave and S‐wave velocities. As such, these effects can be frequency dependent due to wave‐induced fluid flow. A simple modelling study combining a frequency‐dependent fractured rock model, and a frequency‐dependent partial saturation model was used to gain valuable interpretations of our experimental observations and possible implications, which would be useful for field seismic data interpretation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12378
2016-05-23
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AmalokwuK., BestA.I., SothcottJ., ChapmanM., MinshullT. and LiX.‐Y.2014. Water saturation effects on elastic wave attenuation in porous rocks with aligned fractures. Geophysical Journal International197, 943–947.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AmalokwuK., ChapmanM., BestA.I., MinshullT.A. and LiX.‐Y.2015a. Water saturation effects on P‐wave anisotropy in synthetic sandstone with aligned fractures. Geophysical Journal International202, 1088–1095.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AmalokwuK., ChapmanM., BestA.I., SothcottJ., MinshullT.A. and LiX.‐Y.2015b. Experimental observation of water saturation effects on shear wave splitting in synthetic rock with fractures aligned at oblique angles. Geophysical Journal International200, 17–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BestA.I., McCannC. and SothcottJ.1994. The relationships between the velocities, attenuations and petrophysical properties of reservoir sedimentary rocks1. Geophysical Prospecting42, 151–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BestA.I., SothcottJ. and McCannC.2007. A laboratory study of seismic velocity and attenuation anisotropy in near‐surface sedimentary rocks. Geophysical Prospecting55, 609–625.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BlairD.P.1990. A direct comparison between vibrational resonance and pulse transmission data for assessment of seismic attenuation in rock. Geophysics55, 51–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BrieA., PampuriF., MarsalaA. and MeazzaO.1995. Shear sonic interpretation in gas‐bearing sands. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. CadoretT., MarionD. and ZinsznerB.1995. Influence of frequency and fluid distribution on elastic wave velocities in partially saturated limestones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth100, 9789–9803.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CaspariE., MüllerT. and GurevichB.2011. Time‐lapse sonic logs reveal patchy CO2 saturation in‐situ. Geophysical Research Letters38.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CastagnaJ.P., BatzleM.L. and EastwoodR.L.1985. Relationships between compressional‐wave and shear‐wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks. Geophysics50, 571–581.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ChapmanM.2003. Frequency‐dependent anisotropy due to meso‐scale fractures in the presence of equant porosity. Geophysical Prospecting51, 369–379.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ChapmanM., MaultzschS., LiuE. and LiX.‐Y.2003. The effect of fluid saturation in an anisotropic multi‐scale equant porosity model. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 191–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. de FigueiredoJ.J.S., SchleicherJ., StewartR.R., DayurN., OmoboyaB., WileyR.et al. 2013. Shear wave anisotropy from aligned inclusions: ultrasonic frequency dependence of velocity and attenuation. Geophysical Journal International.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. DellingerJ. and VernikL.1994. Do traveltimes in pulse‐transmission experiments yield anisotropic group or phase velocities? Geophysics59, 1774–1779.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DvorkinJ.P. and MavkoG.2006. Modeling attenuation in reservoir and nonreservoir rock. The Leading Edge25, 194–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. GiraudA., HuynhQ.V., HoxhaD. and KondoD.2007. Application of results on Eshelby tensor to the determination of effective poroelastic properties of anisotropic rocks‐like composites. International Journal of Solids and Structures44, 3756–3772.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. GistG.A.1994. Interpreting laboratory velocity measurements in partially gas‐saturated rocks. Geophysics59, 1100–1109.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. GreenspanL.1977. Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section A: Physics and Chemistry81A, 89–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. GregoryA.1976. Fluid saturation effects on dynamic elastic properties of sedimentary rocks. Geophysics41, 895–921.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HudsonJ.A.1981. Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves in material containing cracks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society64, 133–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. KingM.S., MarsdenJ.R. and DennisJ.W.2000. Biot dispersion for P‐ and S‐wave velocities in partially and fully saturated sandstones. Geophysical Prospecting48, 1075–1089.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KlimentosT.1995. Attenuation of P‐ and S‐waves as a method of distinguishing gas and condensate from oil and water. Geophysics60, 447–458.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. KnightR., DvorkinJ. and NurA.1998. Acoustic signatures of partial saturation. Geophysics63, 132–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KoesoemadinataA. and McMechanG.2001. Empirical estimation of viscoelastic seismic parameters from petrophysical properties of sandstone. Geophysics66, 1457–1470.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LiuE., QueenJ.H., LiX.Y., ChapmanM., MaultzschS., LynnH.B.et al. 2003. Observation and analysis of frequency‐dependent anisotropy from a multicomponent VSP at Bluebell‐Altamont field, Utah. Journal of Applied Geophysics54, 319–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MavkoG. and MukerjiT.1998. Bounds on low‐frequency seismic velocities in partially saturated rocks. Geophysics63, 918–924.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. MavkoG.M. and NurA.1979. Wave attenuation in partially saturated rocks. Geophysics44.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McCannC. and SothcottJ.1992. Laboratory measurements of the seismic properties of sedimentary rocks. Geological Society, London, Special Publications65, 285–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. MüllerT., GurevichB. and LebedevM.2010. Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave‐induced flow in porous rocks — A review. Geophysics75, 75A147–75A164.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. MurphyW., WinklerK. and KleinbergR.1986. Acoustic relaxation in sedimentary rocks: Dependence on grain contacts and fluid saturation. Geophysics51, 757–766.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. MurphyW.F.1982. Effects of partial water saturation on attenuation in Massillon sandstone and Vycor porous glass. J. Acoust Soc. Am. 71, 1458–1468.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. MurphyW.F.1984. Acoustic measures of partial gas saturation in tight sandstones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth89, 11549–11559.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. PapamichosE., BrignoliM. and SantarelliF.J.1997. An experimental and theoretical study of a partially saturated collapsible rock. Mechanics of Cohesive‐frictional Materials2, 251–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. PickettG.1963. Acoustic character logs and their applications in formation evaluation. Journal of Petroleum Technology15, 659–667.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. QianZ., ChapmanM., LiX., DaiH., LiuE., ZhangY.et al. 2007. Use of multicomponent seismic data for oil‐water discrimination in fractured reservoirs. The Leading Edge26, 1176–1184.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. RathoreJ.S., FjaerE., HoltR.M. and RenlieL.1995. P‐ and S‐wave anisotropy of a synthetic sandstone with controlled crack geometryl1. Geophysical Prospecting43, 711–728.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. SchmittL., ForsansT. and SantarelliF.J.1994. Shale testing and capillary phenomena. Internal Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts31, 411–427.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. SunX., TangX., ChengC.H. and FrazerL.N.2000. P‐ and S‐wave attenuation logs from monopole sonic data. Geophysics65, 755–765.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. TathamR.H. and StoffaP.L.1976. Vp/Vs—a potential hydrocarbon indicator. Geophysics41, 837–849.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. TillotsonP., ChapmanM., BestA.I., SothcottJ., McCannC., ShangxuW.et al. 2011. Observations of fluid‐dependent shear‐wave splitting in synthetic porous rocks with aligned penny‐shaped fractures‡. Geophysical Prospecting59, 111–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. TillotsonP., ChapmanM., SothcottJ., BestA.I. and LiX.‐Y.2014. Pore fluid viscosity effects on P‐ and S‐wave anisotropy in synthetic silica‐cemented sandstone with aligned fractures. Geophysical Prospecting62, 1238–1252.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. TillotsonP., SothcottJ., BestA.I., ChapmanM. and LiX.‐Y.2012. Experimental verification of the fracture density and shear‐wave splitting relationship using synthetic silica cemented sandstones with a controlled fracture geometry. Geophysical Prospecting60, 516–525.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. WangX.Q., SchubnelA., FortinJ., DavidE.C., GuéguenY.et al. 2012. High Vp/Vs ratio: Saturated cracks or anisotropy effects? Geophysical Research Letters39, L11307.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. WeiJ. and DiB.2008. A physical model study of effect of fracture aperture on seismic wave. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences51, 233–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. WhiteJ.E.1975. Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics40, 224–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. WinklerK. and NurA.1979. Pore fluids and seismic attenuation in rocks. Geophysical Research Letters6, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. WinklerK. and NurA.1982. Seismic attenuation: effects of pore fluids and frictional‐sliding. Geophysics47, 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. WuX., ChapmanM., LiX.‐Y. and BostonP.2014. Quantitative gas saturation estimation by frequency‐dependent amplitude‐ Versus‐offset analysis. Geophysical Prospecting62, 1224–1237.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. XuS.1998. Modelling the effect of fluid communication on velocities in anisotropic porous rocks. International Journal of Solids and Structures35, 4685–4707.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. YaoQ., HanD.‐H., YanF. and ZhaoL.2015. Modeling attenuation and dispersion in porous heterogeneous rocks with dynamic fluid modulus. Geophysics80, D183–D194.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12378
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12378
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Fluid saturation; Fractures; Seismic anisotropy; Shear‐wave splitting

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error