1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 64, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 64 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

In this study, we derived accurate and high‐resolution attenuation profiles using spectral ratio, centroid frequency shift, and seismic interferometry methods. We utilized high‐quality vertical seismic profiling and sonic waveform data acquired in a carbonate reservoir located in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. The scattering profile of vertical‐seismic‐profiling data contributes significantly to wave attenuation that can be explained by high heterogeneity of the carbonate rocks. The scattering profile also correlates well with the reservoir lithology and fractured zones imaged by the Formation MicroImager. A tar mat zone occurs within the lower part of Arab D reservoir. This zone corresponds with a decrease in scattering attenuation. The tar mat may have filled the pores and made this zone less heterogeneous. Therefore, a decrease in scattering attenuation can be considered a potential parameter for tar mat detection. After removing the scattering effect, nonphysical negative intrinsic attenuation values still exist at certain depths. The most probable explanation for this is the three‐dimensional scattering effect, which is not taken into account in this paper, and short‐period upgoing waves. Seismic interferometry is less sensitive to the remaining scattered upgoing wave, which is why seismic interferometry method shows fewer negative values than the spectral ratio and centroid frequency shift methods. Compared with vertical‐seismic‐profiling attenuation, scattering attenuation estimated from sonic waveforms recorded in the reservoir zones is insignificant, and the intrinsic attenuation is almost equivalent to the total attenuation. We attribute this underestimation of the scattering attenuation to the sparse spatial sampling of the sonic logging data at 0.1524 m, which is not sufficient to appropriately estimate the scattering effect in heterogeneous media. The cross‐plots between sonic attenuation and various petrophysical properties show slight dependence between the sonic attenuation and neutron porosity and resistivity in the reservoir zones. However, we can highlight from these plots two zones belonging to the Arab reservoirs. The lower zone corresponds to Arab D reservoir and displays higher sonic intrinsic attenuation than the upper zone (Arab A–C reservoirs) due to higher oil saturation. This highlights the sensitivity of the intrinsic attenuation to the oil saturation.

© 2016 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2016 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12388
2016-05-24
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12388
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AdamL., BatzleM., LewallenK.T. and WijkK.V.2009. Seismic wave attenuation in carbonates. Journal of Geophysical Research114(B06).
     [Google Scholar]
  2. AlfordR.M.1986. Shear data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy: Dilley, Texas. 56th SEG meeting, Houston, Texas, Expanded Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AliM.Y. and WorthingtonM.H2011. Seismic modelling of a fractured carbonate reservoir in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. GeoArabia16, 89–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BathM.1974. Spectral Analysis in Geophysics. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BouchaalaF., AliM.Y. and FaridA.2014. Estimation of compressional seismic wave attenuation of carbonate rocks in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirate. CR‐Geoscience346, 169–178.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BouchaalaF., AliM.Y. and MatsushimaJ.2016. Estimation of seismic attenuation in carbonate rocks using three different methods: Application on VSP data from Abu Dhabi oilfield. Journal of Applied Geophysics (under review).
     [Google Scholar]
  7. ElkhalilS. and IshiyamaT.2007. Q‐Borehole Survey: Zero Offset VSP. Internal report for ADMA‐OPCO Company, Abu Dhabi.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. FrazerL.N., SunX.H. and WilkensR.H.1997. Changes in attenuation with depth in an ocean carbonate section: Ocean Drilling Program sites 806 and 807, Ontong Java Plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research102, 2983–2997.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. GardnerG.H.F. and WyllieM.R.J.1964. Effects of pressure and fluid saturation on the attenuation of elastic waves in sands.Journal of the Petroleum Technology16, 189–198.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. GoupillaudP.L.1961. An approach to inverse filtering of near surface effects from seismic records. Geophysics26,754–760.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GuerinG. and GoldbergD.2002. Sonic waveform attenuation in gas hydrate‐bearing sediments from Malik 2L‐38 research well, Mackenzie Delta, Canada. Journal of Geophysical Research107, 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. HamiltonE.L.1972. Compressional wave attenuation in marine sediments. Geophysics37, 620–646.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. JohnstonD.H., ToksözM.N. and TimurtA.1979. Attenuation of seismic waves in dry and saturated rocks: II. Mechanisms. Geophysics60, 447–458.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. KlimentosT.1995. Attenuation of P and S waves as a method of distinguishing gas and condensate from oil and water. Geophysics60, 447–458.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. MataridT.M., LehmannC.T., IbrahimK.I., CobbD.O. and SmithA.2009. Innovative integration of seismic and well data to characterize Tar Mat in carbonate reservoirs. International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar.
  16. MateevaA.2003. Thin horizontal layering as stratigraphic filter in absorption estimation and seismic deconvolution. PhD thesis, Colorado School of Mines, USA.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. MatsushimaJ.2006. Seismic wave attenuation in methane hydrate‐bearing sediments: vertical seismic profiling data from the Nankai Trough exploratory well, offshore Tokai, central Japan. Journal of Geophysical Research111.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. MatsushimaJ., AliM.Y. and BouchaalaF.2016. Seismic attenuation estimation from zero‐offset VSP data using seismic interferometry. Geophysical Journal International204, 1288–1307.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. MavkoG.M. and NurA.1979. Wave attenuation in partially saturated rocks. Geophysics44, 161–178.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. McCannC.1969. Attenuation of compressional waves in marine sediments. Geophysics34, 882–892.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. MethaK.R., SniederR. and Graizer.V.2007. Extraction of near surface properties for a lossy layering medium using the propagator matrix. Geophysical Journal International169, 271–280.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. MüllerT.M., GurevichB. and LebedevM.2010. Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion resulting from wave‐induced flow in porous rocks—A review. Geophysics75, 147–164.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. NurA. and SimmonsG.1969. The effect of viscosity and of a fluid phase on velocity in low porosity rocks. Earth and Planetary Science Letters7, 183–193.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. PevznerR., MullerT., GavinR., AlasbaliA., UrosevicM. and GuervichB.2013. Seismic attenuation from VSP and well log data: approaches, problems and relative contribution of scattering. EAGE Workshop, Seismic Attenuation, Singapore, Extended Abstracts.
  25. PriestJ.A., BestA.I. and ClaytonC.I.2006. Attenuation of seismic waves in methane gas hydrate‐bearing sand. Geophysical Journal International164,149–159.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. QuanY. and HarrisM.J.1997. Seismic attenuation tomography using the frequency shift method. Geophysics62, 895–905.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. SchoenbergerM. and LevinF.1974. Apparent attenuation due to intrabed multiples. Geophysics39, 278–291.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. SharmaM.M. and TutuncuA.N.1994. Grain contact adhesion hysteresis: A mechanism for attenuation of seismic waves. Geophysical Research Letters21, 2323–2326.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. ShumwayG.1960. A resonant chamber method for sound velocity and attenuation measurements in sediments. Geophysics25, 659–682.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. ShyamC. and MinshullT.A.2004. The effect of hydrate content on seismic attenuation: A case study for Mallik2L‐38well data, Mackenzie delta, Canada. Geophysical Research Letters31.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. StainsbyS.D. and WorthingtonM.H.1985. Q estimation from vertical seismic profile data and anomalous variations in the central North Sea. Geophysics50, 615–626.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. SunX and FrazerL.N.2000. Shear wave attenuation profile from sonic dipole well‐log data. Geophysical Research Letters27.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. SunY.F. and GoldbergD.2001. An analytical relationship between scattering attenuation and porosity in oceanic crust. Geophysical Research Letter28, 3393–3396.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. SuzikiH. and MatsushimaJ.2013. Quantifying uncertainties in attenuation estimation at methane‐hydrate‐bearing zones using sonic waveform logs. Geophysics78, 339–353.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. ToksözM.N., JohnstonD.H. and TimurA.1979. Attenuation of seismic waves in dry and saturated rocks: I. Laboratory measurements. Geophysics44, 681–690.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. WhiteJ.E.1975. Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics40, 224–232.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. WinklerK. and NurA.1982. Pore fluids and seismic attenuation in rocks. Geophysical Research Letters6, 1–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. WuR.S. and AkiK.1988. Introduction: Seismic wave scattering in three dimensionally heterogeneous Earth. Pure and Applied Geophysics47, 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. WyllieM.R.J. and GardnerG.H.F.1962. Studies of elastic wave attenuation in porous media. Geophysics27, 569–589.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12388
Loading
Attenuation modes from Vertical Seismic Profiling and sonic waveform in a carbonate reservoir, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Geophysical Prospecting 64, 1030 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12388
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12388
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12388
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Attenuation; Carbonate rocks; Sonic waveforms; Tar mat; Vertical seismic profiling

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error