1887
Volume 64 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Seismic attenuation and velocity dispersion are potentially able to reveal the rock physical properties of the subsurface. Conventionally, a frequency‐independent quality factor () is measured. This is equivalent to the total velocity dispersion in a seismic record and is inadequate for analysing the attenuation mechanism or rock physical properties. Here a new method is proposed to extract the velocity dispersion curves so that more attributes can be obtained from full‐waveform multichannel sonic logging data, especially the critical frequency () if it is within the bandwidth of the data. This method first decomposes the seismic data into a series of frequency components, computes the semblance of each frequency component for different velocity values, cross‐correlates the semblance matrices of adjacent frequency components to get the velocity gradients, and finally integrates to obtain a velocity dispersion curve. Results of this method are of satisfactory accuracy and robustness. This method is applied to the data acquired in Mallik 5L‐38 gas hydrate research well in Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada. The observed P‐wave velocity dispersion compares well with the geological setting. In the gas hydrate zone (about 900 m–1100 m), high concentration of gas hydrate causes very strong velocity dispersion and a distinct at about 15 kHz, likely due to strong scattering of centimetre‐scale inclusions of gas hydrate; concurrently, water flow in connected cracks in some ranges of this zone adds a large part of velocity dispersion and a dimmer at about 9.5 kHz. Immediate underneath the gas hydrate zone, abundant free water in weakly laminated sediments causes quite strong velocity dispersion and an at about 6.5 kHz. Velocity dispersion is mild and without an obvious in sediments above the gas hydrate zone.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12410
2016-06-28
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AkiK. and RichardsP.G.2002. Quantitative Seismology, 2nd edn. University Science Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BaronL. and HolligerK.2010. Analysis of the velocity dispersion and attenuation behavior of multifrequency sonic logs. In: Advances in Near‐Surface Seismology and Ground‐Penetrating Radar (eds R.Miller , J.Bradford , and K.Holliger ), pp. 153–166. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BellefluerG., RiedelM., HuangJ., SaekiT., MilkereitB., RamachandranK.et al. 2012. Seismic characterization of gas hydrate accumulations in a permafrost environment: Lessons learned from Mallik, Northwest Territories, Canada. In: Scientific Results from the JOGMEC/NRCan/Aurora Mallik 2007‐2008 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada (eds S.R.Dallimore , K.Yamamoto , J.F.Wright , and G.Bellefluer ), pp. 107–123. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 601.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BestA.I., PriestJ.A., ClaytonC.R.I. and ReesE.V.L.2013. The effect of methane hydrate morphology and water saturation on seismic wave attenuation in sand under shallow sub‐seafloor conditions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters368, 78–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BiotM.A.1956. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous solid. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America28, 168–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BrajanovskiM., MüllerT.M. and GurevichB.2006. Characteristic frequencies of seismic attenuation due to wave‐induced fluid flow in fractured porous media. Geophysical Journal International166, 574–578.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BrownR.L. and SeifertD.1997. Velocity dispersion: A tool for characterizing reservoir rocks. Geophysics62, 477–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ChiarabbaC., PiccininiD. and De GoriP.2009. Velocity and attenuation tomography of the Umbria Marche 1997 fault system: Evidence of a fluid‐governed seismic sequence. Tectonophysics476, 73–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. CollettT.S., LewisR.S. and DallimoreS.R.2005. JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 5L‐38 gas hydrate production research well downhole well‐log and core montages. In: Scientific Results from the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada (eds S.R.Dallimore and T.S.Collett ), 23 pp. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 585.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DallimoreS.R. and CollettT.S.2005. Summary and implications of the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program. In: Scientific Results from the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada (eds S.R.Dallimore and T.S.Collett ), 36 pp. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 585.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DallimoreS.R., TaylorA.E., WrightJ.F., NixonF.M., CollettT.S. and UchidaT.2005. Overview of the coring program for the JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 5L‐38 gas hydrate production well. In: Scientific Results from the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada (eds S.R.Dallimore and T.S.Collett ), 17 pp. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 585.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. EllisD.V. and SingerJ.M.2008. Well Logging for Earth Scientists, 2nd edn. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. JohnsonD.L.2001. Theory of frequency dependent acoustics in patchy‐saturated porous media. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America110, 682–694.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KimballC.V. and MarzettaT.L.1984. Semblance processing of borehole acoustic array data. Geophysics49, 274–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LiuH.‐P., AndersonD.L. and KanamoriH.1976. Velocity dispersion due to anelasticity; implications for seismology and mantle composition. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society47, 41–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MavkoG. and JizbaD.1991. Estimating grain‐scale fluid effects on velocity dispersion in rocks. Geophysics56, 1940–1949.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MedioliB.E., WilsonN., DallimoreS.R., ParéD., Brennan‐AlpertP. and OdaH.2005. Sedimentology of the cored interval, JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 5L‐38 gas hydrate production well, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories. In: Scientific Results from the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada (eds S.R.Dallimore and T.S.Collett ), 21 pp. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 585.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MilkereitB.1987. Decomposition and inversion of seismic data—An instantaneous slowness approach. Geophysical Prospecting35, 875–894.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MilkereitB. and JiJ.2005. Extraction of Stoneley waves from full waveform sonic data. 67th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, Z‐99.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MüllerT.M. and GurevichB.2005. Wave‐induced fluid flow in random porous media: Attenuation and dispersion of elastic waves. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America117, 2737–2741.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. PrideS.R. and BerrymanJ.G.2003. Linear dynamics of double‐porosity dual‐permeability materials: I. Governing equations and acoustic attenuation. Physical ReviewE68, 036603.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. RubinoJ.G., GuarracinoL., MüllerT.M. and HolligerK.2013. Do seismic waves sense fracture connectivity? Geophysical Research Letters40, 692–696.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. RubinoJ.G. and HolligerK.2013. Seismic attenuation due to wave‐induced fluid flow at microscopic and mesoscopic scales. Geophysical Prospecting61, 882–889.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. RubinoJ.G., RavazzoliC.L. and SantosJ.E.2009. Equivalent viscoelastic solids for heterogeneous fluid‐saturated porous rocks. Geophysics74, N1–N13.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SamsM.S., NeepzJ.P., WorthingtonM.H. and KingM.S.1997. The measurement of velocity dispersion and frequency‐dependent intrinsic attenuation in sedimentary rocks. Geophysics62, 1456–1464.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. SunL.F., CampbellA. and MilkereitB.2013. Continuous mapping of P wave velocity dispersion: A useful tool for reservoir characterization. 75th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, 5554–5558.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SunL.F. and MilkereitB.2014. Investigating Reservoir Characteristics by Mapping P Wave Velocity Dispersion. 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts, 3650–3654.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SunL.F., MilkereitB. and SchmittD.R.2009. Measuring velocity dispersion and attenuation in the exploration seismic frequency band. Geophysics74 (2), WA113–WA122.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. TisatoN., QuintalB., ChapmanS., PodladchikovY. and BurgJ.‐P.2015. Bubbles attenuate elastic waves at seismic frequencies: First experimental evidence. Geophysical Research Letters42, 3880–3887.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. TomsJ., MüllerT.M. and GurevichB.2007. Seismic attenuation in porous rocks with random patchy saturation. Geophysical Prospecting55, 671–678.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. WhiteJ.E.1975. Computed seismic speeds and attenuation in rocks with partial gas saturation. Geophysics40, 224–232.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. ZanothS.R., SaengerE.H., KrügerO.S. and ShapiroS.A.2007. Leaky mode: A mechanism of horizontal seismic attenuation in a gas‐hydrate‐bearing sediment. Geophysics72(5), E159–E163.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12410
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12410
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Gas hydrate; Rock physical properties; Velocity dispersion

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error