Applying the tilt‐depth and contact‐depth methods to the magnetic anomalies of thin dykes

References

1. CooperG.R.J.2012. The semi‐automatic interpretation of magnetic dyke anomalies. Computers & Geosciences44, 95–99.
   [Google Scholar]
2. CooperG.R.J.2014. The automatic determination of the location, depth, and dip of contacts from aeromagnetic data. Geophysics79(3), J35–J41.
   [Google Scholar]
3. CooperG.R.J.2015. Using the analytic signal amplitude to determine the location and depth of thin dykes from magnetic data. Geophysics80(1), J1–J6.
   [Google Scholar]
4. MillerH.G. and SinghV.1994. Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential field sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics32, 213–217.
   [Google Scholar]
5. RefordM.S.1964. Magnetic anomalies over thin sheets. Geophysics29, 532–536.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ReidA.B., AllsopJ.M., GranserH., MilletA.J. and SomertonI.W.1990. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution. Geophysics55, 80–91.
   [Google Scholar]
7. SalemA., WilliamsS., FairheadJ.D., RavatD. and SmithR.2007. Tilt‐depth method: A simple depth estimation method using first‐order magnetic derivatives. The Leading Edge26, 1502–1505.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ThompsonD.T.1982. EULDPH: A new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data. Geophysics47(1) 31–37.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ThurstonJ.B. and SmithR.S.1997. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI method. Geophysics62(3), 807–813.
   [Google Scholar]