1887

Abstract

Summary

Marine geophysical techniques are a staple tool for shallow section site investigation. Very- and Ultra-High-Resolution (VHR and UHR) seismic reflection imaging using Chirp, boomer, sparker and small airgun sources is a particularly common technique, employed the world-over for site investigations in a huge range of water depths, substrates, and environments. Seismic reflection profiling is relatively fast, cheap, and flexible, permitting the acquisition of surveys to target everything from decimetre-scale object detection to large-scale geological ground model building. However, these data are almost always interpreted in a purely qualitative manner, providing information on the spatial variation in facies boundaries, but no quantitative information on the composition (and spatial variation in composition) of said facies. In both industry and academia, quantitative information regarding the particular geological and geotechnical makeup of the subsurface is predominantly derived from direct sampling with cores, boreholes, and cone penetrometers.

I present a summary of the published research on quantitative imaging of the shallow subsurface. I look at the different inversion methods that have been developed and the soil/sediment properties derived. I will conclude by discussing the major outstanding questions and propose some potential pathways forward that may bring site investigation more in line with hydrocarbon prospection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602145
2016-09-04
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Gerstoft, P.
    [1994] Inversion of geoacoustic data using genetic algorithms and a postiori probability distributions. J Acoust. Soc. Am., 95(2), 770–782.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hamilton, E.
    [1972] Compressional Wave Attenuation in Marine Sediments. Geophysics, 37(4), 620–646.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hamilton, I.W., Hartley, B., Angheluta, C., Digby, A.
    [2004] Turning High Resolution Geophysics Upside-down: Application of Seismic Inversion to Site Investigation and Geohazard Problems. OTC-16096-MS, Offshore Technology Conference, 3–6 May, Houston, Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Holland, C.W., Dettmer, J.
    [2013] In situ sediment dispersion estimates in the presence of discrete layers and gradients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, 50–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Liingaard, M.A., Mygind, M., Thomas, S., Clare, M., Pickles, A.
    [2012] Evidence of Tertiary Intrusive Rock at the West of Duddon Sands Offshore Wind Farm. SUT-OSIG-12-12, Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics: Integrated Technologies - Present and Future, 12–14 September, London, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Morgan, E.C., Vanneste, M., Lecomte, I., Baise, L.G., Longva, O., McAdoo, B.
    [2012] Estimation of free gas saturation from seismic reflection surveys by the genetic algorithm inversion of a P-wave attenuation model. Geophysics, 77(4), R175–R187.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Panda, S., LeBlanc, L.R., Schock, S.G.
    [1994] Sediment classification based on impedance and attenuation estimation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 96(5), 3022–3035.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pinson, L.J.W., Henstock, T.J., Dix, J.K., Bull, J.M.
    [2008] Estimating quality factor and mean grain size of sediments from high-resolution marine seismic data. Geophysics, 73(4), G19–G28.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Richardson, M., Briggs, K.
    [2004] Empirical predictions of Seafloor Properties Based on Remotely Measured Sediment Impedance. High Frequency Ocean Acoustics Conference, 12–21, AIP, Melville, NY.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Russell, B., Hampson, D., Schuelke, J., Quirein, J.
    [1997] Multiattribute seismic analysis. The Leading Edge, 16(10), 1439–1443.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Seong, W., Park, C.
    [2001] Geoacoustic Inversion via Genetic Algorithm and its Application to Manganese Sediment Identification. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 19, 37–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Stevenson, I.R., McCann, C., Runciman, P.B.
    [2002] An attenuation-based sediment classification technique using Chirp sub-bottom profiler data and laboratory acoustic analysis. Marine Geophysical Researches, 23, 277–298.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Vardy, M.E.
    [2015] Deriving shallow-water sediment properties using post-stack acoustic impedance inversion. Near Surface Geophysics, 13, 143–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Vardy, M.E., Dix, J.K., Henstock, T.J., Bull, J.M., and Gutowski, M.
    [2008] Decimetre-Resolution 3D Seismic Volume in Shallow Water: A Case Study in Small Object Detection. Geophysics, 73(2), B33–B40.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Vardy, M.E., Vanneste, M., Henstock, T.J., Morgan, E., Pinson, L.J.W.
    [2015] Can high-resolution marine geophysical data be inverted for soil properties?Proc. Inst. Acoust., 37, 149–156.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602145
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602145
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error