1887

Abstract

Summary

We present a two-step procedure to full-waveform inversion (FWI) that combines a stochastic, genetic algorithm optimization and a subsequent gradient-based inversion with the aim to estimate a high-resolution P-wave velocity (Vp) model of the shallow seabed layers. In particular, we take advantage of the broad band frequency content of the seismic well-site (WSS) data to extend the frequency range up to 70 Hz. The first step is a genetic algorithm optimization aimed at deriving a reliable starting model for the subsequent gradient-based FWI. The lack of low frequencies and the limited maximum offset of the WSS acquisition, make the GA inversion particularly crucial as it provides a Vp field that contains the low-medium wavelengths of the subsurface compressional velocity field. These wavelengths are essential to attenuate the risk for the following gradient-based FWI of being trapped into local minima. The gradient-based FWI is performed in the acoustic approximation thus inverting for the Vp only. This two-step procedure yields a final Vp model characterized by an improved resolution with respect to the outcomes of GA-FWI and many fine details of the layering. The fair match between the reflections kinematics in the actual and predicted data supports the reliability of the final model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602146
2016-09-04
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aleardi, M., Tognarelli, A., and Mazzotti, A.
    [2015]. Characterization of Shallow Marine Sediments by Means of High Resolution Velocity Analysis and Stochastic 1D FWI. 21st European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, DOI: 10.3997/2214‑4609.201413804.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201413804 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aleardi, M., and Mazzotti, A.
    [2016]. 1D Elastic full-waveform inversion and uncertainty estimation by means of hybrid genetic algorithm-Gibbs sampler approach. Accepted for publication in Geophysical Prospecting.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mallick, S., and Dutta, N. C.
    [2002]. Shallow water flow prediction using prestack waveform inversion of conventional 3D seismic data and rock modeling. The Leading Edge, 21(7), 675–680.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sajeva, A., Aleardi, M., Mazzotti, A., Stucchi, E., and Galuzzi, B.
    [2014]. Comparison of Stochastic Optimization Methods on Two Analytic Objective Functions and on a 1D Elastic FWI. 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014, 16–19 June 2014, Amsterdam, DOI: 10.3997/2214‑4609.20140857.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20140857 [Google Scholar]
  5. TognarelliA., Stucchi, E.M., Bienati, N., Sajeva, A., Aleardi, M., and Mazzotti, A.
    [2015]. Two grid stochastic Full Waveform Inversion of 2D Marine Seismic Data. 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2015, 1–4 June 2015, Madrid, DOI: 10.3997/2214‑4609.201413197.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201413197 [Google Scholar]
  6. Virieux, J., and Operto, S.
    [2009]. An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sajeva, A., Aleardi, M., Stucchi, E., Binati, N., Mazzotti, A.
    [2016]. Estimation of acoustic macro-models using genetic full-waveform inversion: applications to the Marmousi model. Accepted for publication in Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602146
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602146
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error