1887

Abstract

Summary

A quantitative physical model of the shallow marine sediments is of crucial importance in broad range of environmental and engineering contexts, from the assessment of tsunamigenic landslides hazard and offshore structure stability, to the identification and monitoring of carbon capture and storage sites. However, in contrast to reservoir geophysics, where quantitative seismic interpretation and inversion are extensively employed tools, sub-seabed characterisation is still heavily reliant on direct samplings, using cores, boreholes and CPTUs. In this context, the role of seismic reflection is often limited to a mostly qualitative interpretation of the reflection architecture. Here we will present the first published application of pre-stack elastic full waveform inversion to a Very-High-Frequency (VHF, 0.4 – 2.5 kHz) multi-channel seismic reflection dataset. A custom-built local multi-parameter sequential waveform inversion method has been developed and tested on two common-shot gathers from a multi-channel Boomer seismic profile acquired in northern Norway. The decimetre-resolution impedance and Poisson’s ratio obtained models strongly agree with the a-priori geotechnical and geological information available in the area, proving the potential of the method in obtaining an accurate remote characterisation of the shallow sediments within a reasonable computational cost and using a traditional multi-channel sub-bottom profiler.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602147
2016-09-04
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Igel, H., Djikpesse, H. and Tarantola, A.
    [1996] Waveform inversion of marine reflection seismograms for P-impedance and Poisson’s ratio. Geophysical journal international, 124, 363–371.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee, K.H. and Kim, H.J.
    [2003] Source-independent full-waveform inversion of seismic data. Geophysics, 68, 2010–2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mallick, S and Dutta, N.C.
    [2002] Shallow water flow prediction using prestack waveform inversion of conventional 3D data and rock modelling, The Leading Edge, 21, 675–680.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Schmidt, H. and Tango, G.
    [1986] Efficient global matrix approach to the computation of synthetic seismograms. Geophysical Journal Research Astronomical Society, 84, 331–359.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tarantola, A.
    [1986] A strategy for nonlinear inversion of seismic reflection data. Geophysics, 51, 1893–1903.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Taner, M.T., Koehler, F., Sheriff, R.E.
    [1979] Complex seismic trace analysis, Geophysics, 44, 1041–1063.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tejero, J., Dagnino, D., Salláres, V., Ranero, C.R.
    [2015] Comparative study of objective functions to overcome noise and bandwidth limitations in full waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 203, 632–645.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vardy, M.E
    [2015] Deriving shallow water sediment properties using post-stack acoustic inversion. Near Surface Geophysics, 13, 143–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vardy, M.E., L’Heureux, J., Vanneste, M., Longva, O., Steiner, A., Forsberg, C.F., Haflidason, H., Brendryen, J.
    [2012] Multidisciplinary investigation of a shallow near-shore landslide, Finneidfjord, Norway. Near Surface Geophysics, 10, 267–277.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    [2009] An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74, 127–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wair, B.R., DeJongJ.T. and Shantz, T.
    [2012] Guidelines for Estimation of Shear Wave Velocity profiles, PEER Report 2012/08.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602147
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602147
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error