A comparison of modified free‐space (MFS), GPR, and TDR techniques for permittivity characterisation of unbound granular pavement materials

References

1. Al‐QadiI.L.1992. Using microwave measurements to detect moisture in asphaltic concrete. Journal of Testing and Evaluation20, 43–50.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Al‐QadiI.L., GhodgaonkarD.K., VaradaV.K. and VaradanV.V.1991. Effect of moisture on asphaltic concrete at microwave frequencies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing29, 710–717.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BaranE.1994. Use of time domain reflectometry for monitoring moisture changes in crushed rock pavements. Symposium and Workshop on Time Domain Reflectometry in Environmental, Infrastructure and Mining Applications, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 349–356.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BerthelotC., PodborochynskiD., SaarenketoT., MarjerisonB. and PrangC.2010. Ground‐penetrating radar evaluation of moisture and frost across typical Saskatchewan road soils. Advances in Civil Engineering 2010,1–9.
   [Google Scholar]
5. H.M.Jol
   CassidyN.J.2009. Electrical and magnetic properties of rocks, soils and fluids. In: Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications (ed H.M.Jol ), pp. 41–72. Elsevier Science.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ChangC.M., ChenJ.S. and WuT.B.2011. Dielectric modelling of asphalt mixtures and relationship with density. Journal of Transportation Engineering137, 104–111.
   [Google Scholar]
7. A.Dawson
   CharlierR., HornychP., SršenM., HermanssonÅ., BjarnasonG., ErlingssonS.et al. 2009. Water influence on bearing capacity and pavement performance: field observations. In: Water in Roads (ed A.Dawson ), pp. 175–192. Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ChazelasA.J.L., DerobertB.X., AdousC.M., VillainD.G., BaltazartE.V., LaguerreF.L. et al. 2007. EM characterization of bituminous concretes using a quadratic experimental design. 4th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar,Naples, Italy, 278–283.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ChungC.C. and LinC.P.2009. Apparent dielectric constant and effective frequency of TDR measurements: influencing factors and comparison. Vadose Zone Journal8, 548–556.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Department of Transport and Main Roads
    Department of Transport and Main Roads . 2014. Material Testing Manual,4th edn. Brisbane, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Department of Transport and Main Roads
    Department of Transport and Main Roads . 2015. MRTS05 Unbound Pavements, Technical Specification.Brisbane, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DiefenderferB., Al‐QadiI. and LouliziA.2000. Laboratory calibration and in situ measurements of moisture by using time‐domain reflectometry probes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board1699, 142–150.
    [Google Scholar]
13. EkbladJ. and IsacssonU.2007. Time‐domain reflectometry measurements and soil‐water characteristic curves of coarse granular materials used in road pavements. Canadian Geotechnical Journal44, 858–872.
    [Google Scholar]
14. EvansR.D., FrostM.W., DixonN. and Stonecliffe‐JonesM.2008. The response of ground penetrating radar (GPR) to changes in temperature and moisture condition of pavement materials. In: Advances in Transportation Geotechnics, pp. 713–718. Nottingham, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
15. FauchardC., DérobertX., CariouJ. and CôteP.2003. GPR performances for thickness calibration on road test sites. NDT & E International36, 67–75.
    [Google Scholar]
16. GroteK., HubbardS., HarveyJ. and RubinY.2005. Evaluation of infiltration in layered pavements using surface GPR reflection techniques. Journal of Applied Geophysics57, 129–153.
    [Google Scholar]
17. HeimovaaraT.J.1993. Design of triple‐wire time domain reflectometry probes in practice and theory. Soil Science Society of America Journal57, 1410–1417.
    [Google Scholar]
18. HuangY.2001. Design, calibration and data interpretation for a one‐port large coaxial dielectric measurement cell. Measurement Science and Technology12, 111–115.
    [Google Scholar]
19. HuismanJ.A., HubbardS.S., RedmanJ.D. and AnnanA.P.2003. Measuring soil water content with ground penetrating radar: a review. Vadose Zone Journal2, 476–491.
    [Google Scholar]
20. JiangY.J. and TayabjiS.D.1998. Evaluation of in situ moisture content at long‐term pavement performance seasonal monitoring program sites. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1655, 32–40.
    [Google Scholar]
21. JiangY.J. and TayabjiS.D.1999. Analysis of time domain reflectometry data from LTPP seasonal monitoring program test sections ‐ Final report. In: Analysis of time domain reflectometry data from LTPP seasonal monitoring program test sections ‐ Final report. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
    [Google Scholar]
22. KlemunesJr.J.1998. Determining soil volumetric moisture content using time domain reflectometry. In: Determining soil volumetric moisture content using time domain reflectometry. Federal Highways Administration(USA).
    [Google Scholar]
23. KlyszG.2004. Spectral analysis of radar surface waves for non‐destructive evaluation of cover concrete. NDT & E International37, 221–227.
    [Google Scholar]
24. LiangR., Al‐AkhrasK. and Rabab’ahS.2006. Field monitoring of moisture variations under flexible pavement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1967, 160–172.
    [Google Scholar]
25. LiuL. and GuoT.2003. Determining the condition of hot mix asphalt specimens in dry, water‐saturated, and frozen conditions using GPR. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics8, 46–52.
    [Google Scholar]
26. LogsdonS.D.2000. Effect of cable length on time domain reflectometry calibration for high surface area soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal64, 54–61.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LoizosA. and PlatiC.2007. Accuracy of pavement thicknesses estimation using different ground penetrating radar analysis approaches. NDT & E International40, 147–157.
    [Google Scholar]
28. MillardS.G., Al‐QadiI.L., ShawM.R., RiadS.M., ShaariA. and BungeyJ.H.2001. Coaxial transmission lines: development of test procedures for concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering13, 202–208.
    [Google Scholar]
29. MullerW.2014. Self‐correcting pavement layer depth estimates using 3D multi‐offset ground penetrating radar (GPR). 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar,Brussels, Belgium, 887–892.
    [Google Scholar]
30. MullerW.2016. Permittivity characterization of unbound granular pavement materials using a modified free‐space approach. Paper accepted for publication in: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
    [Google Scholar]
31. MullerW. and DérobertX.2013. A comparison of phase‐shift and one‐port coaxial cell permittivity measurements for GPR applications. 7th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar,1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
32. MullerW. and ScheuermannA.2016. Optimising a modified free‐space permittivity characterisation method for civil engineering applications. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering13, S9–S18.
    [Google Scholar]
33. MullerW., ScheuermannA. and ReevesB.2012. Quantitative moisture measurement of road pavements using 3D GPR. 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Shanghai, China, 517–523.
    [Google Scholar]
34. PanznerB., JostingmeierA. and AbbasO.2010. Estimation of soil electromagnetic parameters using frequency domain techniques. 13th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar,Lecce, Italy, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
35. PellinenT., Huuskonen‐SnickerE., EskelinenP. and Olmos MartinezP.2015. Representative volume element of asphalt pavement for electromagnetic measurements. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English edition) 2, 30–39.
    [Google Scholar]
36. PlooyR., VillainG., Palma LopesS., IhamoutenA.DérobertX. and ThauvinB.2013. Electromagnetic non‐destructive evaluation techniques for the monitoring of water and chloride ingress into concrete: a comparative study. Materials and Structures48, 369–386.
    [Google Scholar]
37. RainwaterN.R., DrummE.C., YoderR.E. and WilsonG.V.1999. Comprehensive monitoring systems for measuring subgrade moisture conditions. Journal of Transportation Engineering125, 439–448.
    [Google Scholar]
38. ReevesB.2014. Noise modulated GPR: second generation technology. 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, 708–713.
    [Google Scholar]
39. RichterC.A.2006. Long‐Term Pavement Performance Program: Seasonal Variations in the Moduli of Unbound Pavement Layers. Federal Highways Administration, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
40. RobinsonD.A., SchaapM.G., OrD. and JonesS.B.2005. On the effective measurement frequency of time domain reflectometry in dispersive and nonconductive dielectric materials. Water Resources Research41(2).
    [Google Scholar]
41. SaarenketoT.1998. Electrical properties of water in clay and silty soils. Journal of Applied Geophysics40, 73–88.
    [Google Scholar]
42. SaevarsdottirT. and ErlingssonS.2013. Effect of moisture content on pavement behaviour in a heavy vehicle simulator test. Road Materials and Pavement Design14, 274–286.
    [Google Scholar]
43. ShangJ. and UmanaJ.1999. Dielectric constant and relaxation time of asphalt pavement materials. Journal of Infrastructure Systems5, 135–142.
    [Google Scholar]
44. TarantinoA., RidleyA.M. and TollD.G.2008. Field measurement of suction, water content, and water permeability. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering26, 751–782.
    [Google Scholar]
45. TrabelsiS., KraszewskiA.W. and NelsonS.O.2000. Phase‐shift ambiguity in microwave dielectric properties measurements. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement49, 56–60.
    [Google Scholar]
46. WagnerN., SchwingM. and ScheuermannA.2014. Numerical 3‐D FEM and experimental analysis of the open‐ended coaxial line technique for microwave dielectric spectroscopy on soil. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing52, 880–893.
    [Google Scholar]
47. WhalleyW.R.1993. Considerations on the use of time‐domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content. Journal of Soil Science44, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]