1887

Abstract

Summary

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) represents a key technology, allowing us to continue fossil fuel usage while mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. For CCS to be viable, operators must demonstrate that CO2 can be trapped in subsurface layers for thousands of years. A key issue for storage integrity is the geomechancal response of the reservoir. Operators must therefore be able to demonstrate an understanding of the geomechanical effects of CO2 injection. In this paper we consider several large-scale CCS sites, and compare and contrast their geomechanical responses. We also assess how geomechanical deformation has been imaged at these sites, the modelling techniques used, and how models and observations can be linked.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602362
2016-10-24
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CescaS., GrigoliF., HeimannS., GonzálezÁ., BufornE., MaghsoudiS., BlanchE., DahmT.
    , 2014. The 2013 September-October seismic sequence offshore Spain: a case of seismicity triggered by gas injection?Geophysical Journal International198, 941–953.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChadwickR.A., WilliamsG.A., WilliamsJ.D.O., NoyD.J.
    , 2012. Measuring pressure performance of a large saline aquifer during industrial-scale CO2 injection: The Utsira Sand, Norwegian North Sea: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control10, 374–388.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HansenO., GildingD., NazarianB., OsdalB., RingroseP., KristoffersenJ-B., EikenO., HansenH.
    , 2013. Snøhvit: The history of injecting and storing 1Mt CO2 in the fluvial Tubåen Fm.: Energy Procedia37, 3565–3573.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KavenJ.O., HickmanS.H., McGarrA.F., EllsworthW.L.
    , 2015. Surface monitoring of microseismicity at the Decatur, Illinois, CO2 sequestration demonstration site: Seismological Research Letters86, 1096–1101.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. StorkA.L., VerdonJ.P., KendallJ-M.
    , 2015. The microseismic response at the In Salah carbon capture and storage (CCS) site: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control32, 159–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. VascoD.W., RucciA., FerrettiA., NovaliF., BissellR.C., RingroseP.S., MathiesonA.S., WrightI.W.
    , 2010. Satellite-based measurements of surface deformation reveal fluid flow associated with the geological storage of carbon dioxide: Geophysical Research Letters37, L03303.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. VerdonJ.P.
    , 2016. Using microseismic data recorded at the Weyburn CCS-EOR site to assess the likelihood of induced seismic activity: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, in press. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.03.018.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.03.018 [Google Scholar]
  8. VerdonJ.P., KendallJ-M., WhiteD.J., AngusD.A.
    , 2011. Linking microseismic event observations with geomechanical models to minimise the risks of storing CO2 in geological formations: Earth and Planetary Science Letters305, 143–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. VerdonJ.P., StorkA.L., BissellR.C., BondC.E., WernerM.J.
    , 2015. Simulation of seismic events induced by CO2 injection at In Salah, Algeria. Earth and Planetary Science Letters426, 118–129.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602362
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201602362
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error