1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Basin Research
  4. Volume 28, Issue 6
  5. Article
Volume 28, Issue 6
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2117

Abstract

Abstract

The underpressure observed in the glacial valley Adventdalen at Svalbard is studied numerically with a basin model and analytically with a compartment model. The pressure equation used in the basin model, which accounts for underpressure generation, is derived from mass conservation of pore fluid and solid, in addition to constitutive equations. The compartment model is derived as a similar pressure equation, which is based on a simplified representation of the basin geometry. It is used to derive analytical expressions for the underpressure (overpressure) from a series of unloading (loading) intervals. The compartment model gives a characteristic time for underpressure generation of each interval, which tells when the pressure state is transient or stationary. The transient pressure is linear in time for short‐time spans compared to the characteristic time, and then it is proportional to the weight removed from the surface. We compare different contributions to the underpressure generation and find that porosity rebound from unloading is more important than the decompression of the pore fluid during unloading and the thermal contraction of the pore fluid during cooling of the subsurface. Our modelling shows that the unloading from the last deglaciation can explain the present day underpressure. The basin model simulates the subsurface pressure resulting from erosion and unloading in addition to the fluid flow driven by the topography. Basin modelling indicates that the mountains surrounding the valley are more important for the topographic‐driven flow in the aquifer than the recharging in the neighbour valley. The compartment model turns out to be useful to estimate the orders of magnitude for system properties like seal and aquifer permeabilities and decompaction coefficients, despite its geometric simplicity. We estimate that the DeGeerdalen aquifer cannot have a permeability that is higher than 1 · 10−18 m2, as otherwise, the fluid flow in the aquifer becomes dominated by topographic‐driven flow. The upper value for the seal permeability is estimated to be 1 · 10−20 m2, as higher values preclude the generation and preservation of underpressure. The porosity rebound is estimated to be <0.1% during the last deglaciation using a decompaction coefficient α = 1 · 10−9 Pa−1.

Basin Research © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists © 2015 The Authors. Basin Research © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers and International Association of Sedimentologists
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12130
2015-05-10
2024-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/bre.12130
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Audet, D.M. (1995) Mathematical‐modeling of gravitational compaction and clay dehydration in thick sedimentary layers. Geophys. J. Int., 122, 283–298.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Audet, D.M. & Fowler, A.C. (1992) A mathematical model for compaction in sedimentary basins. Geophys. J. Int., 110, 577–590.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bachu, S. & Underschultz, J.R. (1995) Large‐scale underpressuring in the Mississippian‐Cretaceous succession, Southwestern Alberta Basin. AAPG Bull., 79 (7), 989–1004.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bekele, E.B., Rostron, B.J. & Person, M.A. (2003) Fluid pressure implications of erosional unloading, basin hydrodynamics and glaciation in the Alberta Basin, Western Canada. J. Geochem. Explor., 78‐9 (SI), 143–147. Geofluids IV Meeting, Utrecht, Netherlands, May 12‐16, 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Belitz, K. & Bredehoeft, J. (1988) Hydrodynamics of Denver Basin: explanation of subnormal fluid pressures. AAPG Bull., 72 (11), 1334–1359.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bense, V.F. & Person, M.A. (2008) Transient hydrodynamics within intercratonic sedimentary basins during glacial cycles. J. Geophys. Res., 113, F04005.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Borge, H. (2002) Modelling generation and dissipation of overpressure in sedimentary basins: an example from Halten Terrace, offshore Norway. Mar. Pet. Geol., 19, 377–388.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Braathen, A., Balum, K., Christiansen, H.H., Dahl, T., Eiken, O., Elvebakk, H., Hansen, F., Hanssen, T.H., Jochmann, M., Johansen, T.A., Johnsen, H., Larsen, L., Lie, T., Mertes, J., Mork, A., Mork, M.B., Nemec, W., Olaussen, S., Oye, V., Rod, K., Titlestad, G.O., Tveranger, J. & Vagle, K. (2012) The longyearbyen CO2 lab of Svalbard, Norway – initial assessment of the geological conditions for CO2 sequestration. Norw. J. Geol., 92, 353–376.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bradley, J.S. (1975) Abnormal formation pressure. AAPG Bull., 59, 957–973.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chapman, D. (1994) Abnormal Pore Pressures: Essential Theory Possible Causes and Sliding. Developments in Petroleum Science, 38. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Chap. 3, 51–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Corbet, T.F. & Bethke, C.M. (1992) Disequilibrium fluid pressures and groundwater flow in western Canada sedimentary basin. J. Geophys. Res., 97 (B5), 7203–7217.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dickey, P.A. & Cox, W.C. (1977) Oil and gas in reservoirs with subnormal pressures. AAPG Bull. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol., 61 (12), 2134–2142.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Eiriksson, Jon. (2008) Glaciation events in the Pliocene – Pleistocene volcanic succession of Iceland. JOKULL, 58, 315–329.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Elvebakk, H. (2010) Results of borehole logging in well LYB CO2, Dh4 of 2009, Longyearbyen, Svalbard. Tech. rept. 2010.018. Geological Survey of Norway.
  15. Geirsdóttir, Á. (2011) Chapter 16 ‐ Pliocene and Pleistocene Glaciations of Iceland: A Brief Overview of the Glacial History. In: Quaternary Glaciations ‐ Extent and Chronology A Closer Look. Developments in Quaternary Sciences, Vol. 15 (Ed. by J.Ehlers , P.L.Gibbard & P.D.Hughes ), pp. 199–210. Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilliam, T.M. & Morgan, I.L. (1987) Shale: Measurement of Thermal Properties. Tech. rept. ORNL/TM‐10499. Oak Ridge National Laborator, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, P.L. (1994) Physical and chemical aspects of the development of overpressuring in sedimentary environments. Clay Miner., 29 (4), 425–437.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hambrey, M.J. & Glasser, N.F. (2012) Discriminating glacier thermal and dynamic regimes in the sedimentary record. Sed. Geol., 251‐252 (0), 1–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Huyakorn, P.S. & Pinder, G.F. (1983) Computational Methods in Subsurface Flow. Monograph Series. Academic Press, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Iverson, N. & Person, M. (2012) Glacier‐bed geomorphic processes and hydrologic conditions relevant to nuclear waste disposal. Geofluids, 12, 38–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lazear Gregory, D. (2009) Fractures, convection and underpressure: hydrogeology on the southern margin of the Piceance basin, west‐central Colorado, USA. Hydrogeol. J., 17 (3), 641–664.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Lemieux, J.‐M., Sudicky Peltier, W.R. & Tarasov, L. (2008a) Dynamics of groundwater recharge and seepage over the Canadian landscape during the Wisconsinian glaciation. J. Geophys. Res., 113, F01011.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lemieux, J.‐M., Sudicky Peltier, W.R. & Tarasov, L. (2008b) Simulating the impact of glaciations on continental groundwater flow systems: I. Relevant processes and model formulation. J. Geophys. Res., 113, F03017.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Lemieux, J.‐M., Sudicky Peltier, W.R. & Tarasov, L. (2008c) Simulating the impact of glaciations on continental groundwater flow systems: II. Model application to the Wisconsinian glaciation over the Canadian landscape. J. Geophys. Res., 113, F03018.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Liley, P.E. & Gambill, W.R. (1973) Chemical Engineering Handbook. Chap. 3, McGraw‐Hill, New York, pp. 101–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lou, X.R. & Vasseur, G. (1992) Contributions of compaction and aquathermal pressuring to geopressure and the influence of environmental‐conditions. AAPG Bull., 76 (10), 1550–1559.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Luo, X.R. & Vasseur, G. (1995) Modeling of pore pressure evolution associated with sedimentation and uplift in sedimentary basins. Basin Res., 7 (1), 35–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lüthi, M. & Funk, M. (2013) Physics of Glaciers I: Chapter 6: Temperatures in glaciers and ice sheets. Tech. rept. 651‐4101‐00/HS 2013. Versuchsanstalt f�r Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie.
  29. Neuzil, C.E. (1994) How permeable are clays and shales. Water Resour. Res., 30 (2), 145–150.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Neuzil, C.E. & Pollock, D.W. (1983) Erosional unloading and fluid pressures in hydraulically tight rocks. J. Geol., 91 (2), 179–193.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ogata, K., Senger, K., Braathen, A., Tveranger, J. & Olaussen, S. (2012) The importance of natural fractures in a tight reservoir for potential CO2 storage: a case study of the upper Triassic‐middle Jurassic Kapp Toscana Group (Spitsbergen, Arctic Norway). Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. Publ. Online, 374, 1–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Orr, E.D. & Kreitler, C.W. (1985) Interpretation of pressure‐depth data from confined underpressured aquifers exemplified by the deep‐basin brine aquifer, Palo Duro basin, Texas. Water Resour. Res., 21 (4), 533–544.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Parks, K.P. & Toth, J. (1995) Field evidence for erosion‐induced underpressuring in upper cretaceous and tertiary strata, West Central Alberta, Canada. Bull. Can. Pet. Geol., 43 (3), 281–292.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Paus, A. (1989) Late Weichselian vegetation, climate and floral migration at Eigebakken, South Rogaland, Southwestern Norway. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 61 (3‐4), 177–203.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Petit, J.R., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Barkov, N.I., Barnola, J.‐M., Basile, I., Bender, M., Chappellaz, J., Davis, M., Delaygue, G., Delmotte, M., Kotlyakov, V.M., Legrand, M., Lipenkov, V.Y., Lorius, C., Pépin, L., Ritz, C., Saltzman, E. & Stievenard, M. (1999) Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature, 399, 429–436.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Robertsen, E.C. (1988) Thermal properties of rocks. Tech. rept. Open‐File 88‐441. United States Department of the Interior, Geological Survey.
  37. Russell, W.L. (1972) Pressure‐depth relations in Appalachian region. AAPG Bull., 56 (3), 528–536.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Sharp, R.P. (1988) Living Ice: Understanding Glaciers and Glaciation. American Elsevier, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Skirbekk, K., Klitgaard‐Kristensen, D., Rasmussen, T.L., Koc, N. & Forwick, M. (2010) Holocene climate variations at the entrance to a warm Arctic fjord: evidence from Kongsfjorden trough, Svalbard. Geol. Soc. Spec. Pub., 344, 289–304.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Starkel, L. (2003) Younger Dryas‐Preboreal transition documented in the fluvial environment of Polish rivers. Global Planet. Change, 35 (12), 157–167.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Swarbrick, R.E. & Osborne, M.J. (1997) Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins: a reevaluation. AAPG Bull., 81 (6), 1023–1041.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Toth, J. (1978) Gravity‐induced cross‐formational flow of formation fluids, Red Earth region, Alberta, Canada – analysis, patterns, and evolution. Water Resour. Res., 14 (5), 805–843.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. USGS
    USGS (2014) The Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC), http://gdex.cr.usgs.gov/gdex/.
  44. Vinard, P., Bobet, A. & Einstein, H.H. (2001) Generation and evolution of hydraulic underpressures at Wellenberg, Switzerland. J. Geophys. Res., 106 (B12), 30593–30605.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Wangen, M. (1992) Pressure and temperature evolution in sedimentary basins. Geophys. J. Int., 110, 601–613.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wangen, M. (1997) Simple model of pressure build‐up during burial. Geophys. J. Int., 130, 757–764.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Wangen, M. (2001) A quantitative comparison of some mechanisms generating overpressure in sedimentary basins. Tectonophysics, 334, 211–234.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Wangen, M. (2006) Users™ Guide to Bas, version 14.0. Tech. rept. Institute for Energy Technology, Kjeller, Norway.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Wangen, M. (2010) Physical Principles of Sedimentary Basin Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12130
Loading
A model for underpressure development in a glacial valley, an example from Adventdalen, Svalbard
Basin Research 28, 752 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12130
/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12130
/content/journals/10.1111/bre.12130
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error