1887
Volume 15 Number 1
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Electrical resistivity tomography has become a standard geophysical method in the field of hydrogeology, as it has the potential to provide important information regarding the spatial distribution of facies. However, inverted electrical resistivity tomography images tend to be grossly smoothed versions of reality because of the regularisation of the inverse problem. In this study, we use a probabilistic methodology based upon co‐located measurements to assess the utility of electrical resistivity tomography to identify hydrofacies in alluvial aquifers. With this methodology, electrical resistivity tomography images are interpreted in terms of the probability of belonging to pre‐defined hydrofacies. We first analyse through a synthetic study the ability of electrical resistivity tomography to discriminate between different facies. As electrical resistivity tomography data suffer from a loss of sensitivity with depth, we find that low‐sensitivity regions are more affected by misclassification. To counteract this effect, we adapt the probabilistic framework to include the spatially varying data sensitivity. We then apply our learning to a field case. For the latter, we consider two different regularisation procedures. In contrast to the data sensitivity that affects the facies probability to a limited amount, the regularisation can affect the probability maps more considerably because it has a strong influence on the spatial distribution of inverted resistivity. We find that a regularisation strategy based on the most realistic prior information tends to offer the most reliable discrimination of facies. Our results confirm the ability of electrical resistivity tomography surveys, when properly designed, to detect facies variations in alluvial aquifers. The method can be easily extended to other contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2016047
2016-10-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AsterR.C., BorchersB. and ThurberC.2005. Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AudebertM., ClémentR., Touze‐FoltzN., GüntherT., MoreauS. and DuquennoiC.2014. Time‐lapse ERT interpretation methodology for leachate injection monitoring based on multiple inversions and a clustering strategy (MICS). Journal of Applied Geophysics111, 320–333.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BainesD., SmithD.G., FroeseD.G., BaumanP. and NimeckG.2002. Electrical resistivity ground imaging (ERGI): a new tool for mapping the lithology and geometry of channel‐belts and valley‐fills. Sedimentology49(3), 441–449.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BeaujeanJ., NguyenF., KemnaA., AntonssonA. and EngesgaardP.2014. Calibration of seawater intrusion models: inverse parameter estimation using surface electrical resistivity tomography and borehole data. Water Resources Research50(8), 6828–6849.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BersezioR., GiudiciM. and MeleM.2007. Combining sedimentological and geophysical data for high resolution 3D mapping of fluvial architectural elements in the Quaternary Po Plain (Italy). Sedimentary Geology202, 230–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BinleyA., HubbardS.S., HuismanJ.A., RevilA., RobinsonD.A., SinghaK. et al. 2015. The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales. Water Resources Research51, 3837–3866.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. BlaschekR., HördtA. and KemnaA.2008. A new sensitivity‐controlled focusing regularization scheme for the inversion of induced polarization based on the minimum gradient support. Geophysics73(2), F45–F54.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BowlingJ., RodriguezA., HarryD. and ZhengC.2005. Delineating alluvial aquifer heterogeneity using resistivity and GPR data. Ground Water43(6), 890–903.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BowlingJ., HarryD., RodriguezA. and ZhengC.2007. Integrated geophysical and geological investigation of a heterogeneous fluvial aquifer in Colombus Mississippi. Journal of Applied Geophysics65, 58–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CaterinaD., BeaujeanJ., RobertT. and NguyenF.2013. A comparison study of image appraisal tools for electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surface Geophysics11, 639–657.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. CaterinaD., HermansT. and NguyenF.2014. Case studies of incorporation of prior information in electrical resistivity tomography: comparison of different approaches. Near Surface Geophysics12, 451–465.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ChambersJ.E., WilkinsonP.B., WealthallG.P., LokeM.H., DeardenR., WilsonR. et al. 2010. Hydrogeophysical imaging of deposits heterogeneity and groundwater chemistry changes during DNAPL source zone bioremediation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology118(1), 43–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DahlinT. and ZhouB.2004. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting52, 379–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Day‐LewisF.D., SinghaK. and BinleyA.M.2005. Applying petrophysi‐cal models to radar travel time and electrical tomograms: resolution‐dependent limitations. Water Resources Research110, B08–206.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DoetschJ., LindeN., CosciaI., GreenhalghS.A. and GreenA.G.2010. Zonation for 3D aquifer characterization based on joint inversions of multimethod crosshole geophysical data. Geophysics75(6), G53–G64.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DoetschJ., LindeN., PessognelliM., GreenA.G. and GüntherT.2012a. Constraining 3‐D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization. Journal of Applied Geophysics78, 68–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. DoestchJ., LindeN., VogtT., BinleyA. and GreenA.G.2012b. Imaging and quantifying salt‐tracer transport in a riparian groundwater system by means of ED ERT monitoring. Geophysics77(5), B207–B218.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. EzzedineS., RubinY. and ChenJ.1999. Bayesian method for hydrogeo‐logical site characterization using borehole and geophysical survey data: theory and application to the Lawrence Livermore National Superfund site. Water Resources Research35(9), 2671–2683.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HermansT., VandenbohedeA., LebbeL. and NguyenF.2012. Imaging artificial salt water infiltration using electrical resistivity tomography constrained by geostatistical data. Journal of Hydrology, 438–439, 168–180.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HermansT., NguyenF. and CaersJ.2015a. Uncertainty in training image‐based inversion of hydraulic head data constrained to ERT data: workflow and case study. Water Resources Research51, 5332–5352.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HermansT., WildemeerschS., JaminP., OrbanP., BrouyèreS., DassarguesA. et al. 2015b. Quantitative temperature monitoring of a heat tracing experiment using cross‐borehole ERT. Geothermics53, 14–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HinnelA.C., FerreT.P.A., VrugtJ.A., HuismanJ.A., MoyseyS., RingsJ. et al. 2011. Improved extraction of hydrologic information from geophysical data through coupled hydrogeophysical inversion. Water Resources Research46, W00D40.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. IrvingJ. and SinghaK.2010. Stochastic inversion of tracer test and electrical geophysical data to estimate hydraulic conductivities. Water Resources Research46, W11514.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KemnaA.2000. Tomographic inversion of complex resistivity—theory and application. PhD thesis, Ruhr‐University Bochum, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MaharajaA.2008. TiGenerator: object‐based training image generator. Computers & Geosciences34, 1753–1761.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. MastrociccoM., VignoliG., ColombaniN. and ZeidN.A.2010. Surface electrical resistivity tomography and hydrogeological characterization to constrain groundwater flow modeling in an agricultural field site near Ferrara (Italy). Environmental Earth Sciences61(2), 311–322.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MasyT., CaterinaD., TrommeO., LavigneB., ThonartP., HiligsmannS. et al. 2016. Electrical resistivity tomography to monitor enhanced biodegradation of hydrocarbons with Rhodococcus erythopolis T902.1 at a pilot scale. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology184, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. MoyseyS., SinghaK. and KnightR.2005. A framework for inferring field‐scale rock physics relationships through numerical simulation. Geophysical Research Letters32, L08304.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. OwareE.K., MoyseyS. and KhanT.2013. Physically based regulariza‐tion of hydrogeophysical inverse problems for improved imaging of process‐driven systems. Water Resources Research49, 6238–6247.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. PaascheH. and TronickeJ.2007. Cooperative inversion of 2D geophysical data sets: a zonal approach based on fuzzy c‐means cluster analysis. Geophysics72(3), A35–A39.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PaascheH., TronickeJ., HolligerK., GreenA.G. and MaurerH.2006. Integration of diverse physical‐property models: subsurface zonation and petrophysical parameter estimation based on fuzzy c‐means cluster analyses. Geophysics71(3), H33–H44.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. RubinY. and HubbardS.2005. Stochastic forward and inverse modelling. In: Hydrogeophysics (eds. Y.Rubin and S.Hubbard), pp. 487–511. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. RuggeriP., IrvingJ., GloaguenE. and HolligerK.2013. Regional‐scale integration of multiresolution hydrological and geophysical data using a two‐step Bayesian sequential simulation approach. Geophysical Journal International194(1), 289–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. RuggeriP., GloaguenE., LefebvreR., IrvingJ. and HolligerK.2014. Integration of hydrological and geophysical data beyond the local scale: application of Bayesian sequential simulation to field data from the Saint‐Lambert‐de‐Lauzon site, Québec, Canada. Journal of Hydrology514, 271–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SinghaK. and MoyseyS.2006. Accounting for spatially variable resolution in electrical resistivity tomography through field‐scale rock‐physics relations. Geophysics71(4), A25–A28.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. SlaterL., BinleyA.M., DailyW. and JohnsonR.2000. Cross‐hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection. Journal of Applied Geophysics44, 85–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. TikhonovA.N. and ArseninV.A.1977. Solution of Ill‐Posed Problems. Winston & Sons, Washington.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. WildemeerschS., JaminP., OrbanP., HermansT., NguyenF., BrouyèreS. et al. 2014. Coupling heat and chemical tracer experiments for the estimation of heat transfer parameters in shallow alluvial aquifers. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology169, 90–99.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2016047
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2016047
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error