1887
Volume 15 Number 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The grounded electrical‐source airborne transient electromagnetic signal is significantly affected by electromagnetic noise (sferics and aircraft engine electromagnetic noise), leading to inferior image formation. We calculate the theoretical response of the grounded electrical‐source airborne transient electromagnetic system and propose a denoising algorithm based on the transient characters of the theoretical electromagnetic response and the measured noise. The proposed algorithm utilises multi‐resolution analysis via a stationary wavelet transform of the data. Primarily, the measured data are decomposed into detailed coefficients and approximated coefficients. Then, the logarithmic slope of the measured data and a threshold are calculated to identify the noise in the detailed coefficients; the corresponding detailed coefficients are processed to reduce the noise. Finally, the undisturbed data are reconstructed using inverse stationary wavelet transform. The algorithm is verified using synthetic signal and is applied for electromagnetic noise suppression in synthetic data and real data collected over the coastal areas in Yanwei Harbor, China. The results confirm that the denoising algorithm can effectively remove the electromagnetic noise from the grounded electrical‐source airborne transient electromagnetic signal. Moreover, the image formations clearly reveal the structure of the Huaiyin–Xiangshui fault zone.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017003
2016-12-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AllahS.A., MogiT., ItoH., JymoriA., YukkiY., FomenkoE.et al.2013. Three‐dimensional resistivity modelling of grounded electrical‐source airborne transient electromagnetic (GREATEM) survey data from the Nojima Fault, Awaji Island, south‐east Japan. Exploration Geophysics45, 49–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AhujaN., LertrattanapanichS. and BoseN.K.2005. Properties determining choice of mother wavelet. IEEE Proceedings. Vision, Image and Signal Processing152, 659–664.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BoucheddaA., ChouteauM., KeatingP. and SmithR.2010. Sferics noise reduction in time‐domain electromagnetic systems: application to MegaTEMII signal enhancement. Exploration Geophysics41, 225–239.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChenB., LuC.D. and LiuG.D.2014. A denoising method based on kernel principal component analysis for airborne time domain electro‐magnetic data. Chinese Geophysics57, 295–302.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ItoH., MogiT., JomoriA., YuukiY., KihoK., KaiedaH.et al.2011. Further investigations of underground resistivity structures in coastal areas using grounded‐source airborne electromagnetics. Earth, Planets and Space63, e9–e12.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. JiY.J., YangG.H., GuanS.S., ZhangX.S. and TianP.P.2012. Interpretation research on electrical source of time domain ground‐airborne electromagnetic data. 2012 World Automation Congress, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, pp. 1–4. IEEE Computer Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. JiY.J., WangY., XuJ., ZhouF.D., LiS.Y., ZhaoY.P.et al.2013. Development and application of the ground long wire source airborne electromagnetic exploration system based on an unmanned airship. Chinese Geophysics54, 3145–3152.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LemireD.2001. Baseline asymmetry, Tau projection, B‐field estimation and automatic half‐cycle rejection. THEM Geophysics Inc. Technical Report.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LiY., WangJ.F. and LiJ.P.2010. The selection of optimal wavelet basis for radio fuze jamming identification. Second International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Visualization Methods, Sanya, China. IEEE Computer Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LiS.Y., LinJ., YangG.H., TianP.P., WangY., YuS.B.et al.2013. Ground‐airborne electromagnetic signals de‐noising using a combined wavelet transform algorithm. Chinese Geophysics56, 3145–3152.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MallatS.1999. Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MallatS. and HwangW.L.1992. Singularity detection and processing with wavelets. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory38, 617–643.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MogiT., TanakaY., KusunokiK., MorikawaT. and JomoriN.1998. Development of Grounded Electrical Source Airborne Transient EM (GREATEM). Exploration Geophysics29, 61–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MogiT., KusunokiK., KaiedaH., JymoriA., JomoriN. and YuukiY.2009. Grounded electrical‐source airborne transient electromagnetic (GREATEM) survey of Mount Bandai, north‐eastern Japan. Exploration Geophysics40, 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. NabighianM.N.1988. Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 1Theory. Tulsa. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  16. RavierP. and AmblardP.O.2001. Wavelet packets and de‐noising based on higher‐order‐statistics for transient detection. Signal Processing81, 1909–1926.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ReningerP.A., MarteletG., DeparisJ., PerrinJ. and ChenY.2011. Singular value decomposition as a denoising tool for airborne time domain electromagnetic data. Journal of Applied Geophysics75, 264–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ShengY.1986. A single apparent resistivity expression for long‐offset transient electromagnetic. Geophysics51, 1291–1297.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. TronickeJ. and BönigerU.2015. Denoising magnetic data using steering kernel regression. Near Surface Geophysics13, 33–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WangT. and HohmannW.1993. A finite‐difference, time‐domain solution for three dimensional electromagnetic modeling. Geophysics58, 797–809.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. WangY., JiY.J., LiS.Y., LinJ., ZhouF.D. and YangG.H.2013. A wavelet‐based baseline drift correction method for grounded electrical source airborne transient electromagnetic signals. Exploration Geophysics44, 229–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. XiaoQ.B. and ZhaoG.Z.2006. Electrical structure study of the crust‐upper mantle in Dabie‐Sulu orogen.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017003
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017003
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error