High‐resolution reflection seismic imaging for the planning of a double‐train‐track tunnel in the city of Varberg, southwest Sweden

References

1. AdamczykA., MalinowskiM. and MalehmirA.2013. Application of first‐arrival tomography to characterize a quick‐clay landslide site in southwest Sweden.Acta Geophysica61, 1057–1073.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AdamczykA., MalinowskiM. and MalehmirA.2014. High‐resolution near‐surface velocity model building using full‐waveform inversion— A case study from southwest Sweden.Geophysical Journal International197, 1693–1704.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BakerG., SteeplesD., SchmeissnerC. and SpikesK.2000. Collecting seismic‐reflection data from depths shallower than three meters.Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, pp. 1207–1214. Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BartonN.2006. Rock Quality, Seismic Velocity, Attenuation and Anisotropy.Taylor & Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BartonN.2007. Near‐surface gradients of rock quality, deformation modulus, Vp and Qp to 1 km depth.First Break25, 53–60.
   [Google Scholar]
6. BastaniM., PerssonL., MehtaS. and MalehmirA.2015. Boat‐towed radio‐magnetotellurics (RMT)—A new technique and case study from the city of Stockholm.Geophysics80, B193–B202.
   [Google Scholar]
7. BenjumeaB., HunterJ.A., GoodR.L., BurnsR.A. and RossM.2001. Application of high‐resolution seismic‐reflection techniques in Champlain sea sediments near Lachute‐Saint‐Benoit, Quebec.Current Research 2001 D6, 7. Geological Survey of Canada.
   [Google Scholar]
8. BenjumeaB., HunterJ.A., PullanS.E., BrooksG.R., PyneM. and AylsworthJ.M.2008. Vs(30) and fundamental site period estimates in soft sediments of the Ottawa Valley from near‐surface geophysical measurements.Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics13(4), 313–323.
   [Google Scholar]
9. BenjumeaB., MacauA., GabàsA., BellmuntF., FiguerasS. and CirésJ.2011. Integrated geophysical profiles and H/V microtremor measurements for subsoil characterization.Near Surface Geophysics9, 413–425.
   [Google Scholar]
10. BlackR.A., SteeplesD.W. and MillerR.D.1994. Migration of shallow seismic reflection data.Geophysics59, 402–410.
    [Google Scholar]
11. BrodicB., MalehmirA., JuhlinC., DynesiusL., BastaniM. and PalmH.2015. Multicomponent broadband digital‐based seismic landstreamer for near‐surface applications.Journal of Applied Geophysics123, 227–241.
    [Google Scholar]
12. BrodicB., MalehmirA. and JuhlinC.2016. Fracture system characterization using wave‐mode conversions and tunnel‐surface seismics.Near Surface Geoscience Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
13. BrojerdiF.S., ZhangF., JuhlinC., MalehmirA., LehtimäkiT., MattssonH. et al. 2014. High resolution seismic imaging at the planned tunnel entrance to the Forsmark repository for spent nuclear fuel, central Sweden.Near Surface Geophysics12, 709–719.
    [Google Scholar]
14. BükerF., GreenA.G. and HorstmeyerH.1998. Shallow seismic reflection study of a glaciated valley.Geophysics63, 1395–1407.
    [Google Scholar]
15. CosmaC., HeikkinenP., KeskinenJ. and EnescuN.2001a. VSP in crystalline rocks—From downhole velocity profiling to 3‐D fracture mapping.International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences38, 843–850.
    [Google Scholar]
16. CosmaC., OlssonO., KeskinenJ. and HeikkinenP.2001b. Seismic characterization of fracturing at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Sweden, from the kilometer scale to the meter scale.International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences38, 859–865.
    [Google Scholar]
17. DehghannejadM., JuhlinC., MalehmirA., SkyttäP. and WeihedP.2010. Reflection seismic imaging of the upper crust in the Kristineberg mining area, northern Sweden.Journal of Applied Geophysics71, 125–136.
    [Google Scholar]
18. DehghannejadM., MalehmirA., JuhlinC. and SkyttäP.2012. 3D constraints and finite‐difference modeling of massive sulfide deposits: the Kristineberg seismic lines revisited, northern Sweden.Geophysics77, WC69–WC79.
    [Google Scholar]
19. EikenO., DegutschM., RisteP. and RødK.1989. Snowstreamer: an efficient tool in seismic acquisition.First Break7.
    [Google Scholar]
20. GabàsA., MacauA., BenjumeaB., BellmuntF., FiguerasS. and VilàM.2014. Combination of geophysical methods to support urban geological mapping.Surveys in Geophysics35, 983–1002.
    [Google Scholar]
21. HarlovD.E., van den KerkhofA. and JohanessonL.2013. The Varberg‐Torpa Charnockite‐Granite association, SW Sweden: mineralogy, petrology, and fluid inclusion chemistry.Journal of Petrology54, 3–40.
    [Google Scholar]
22. HarlovD.E., van den KerkhofA. and JohanessonL.2014. Localized, solid‐state dehydration associated with the Varberg charnockite intrusion, SW Sweden.Precambrian Research253, 50–62.
    [Google Scholar]
23. KaiserA.E., GreenA.G., CampbellF.M., HorstmeyerH., ManukyanE., LangridgeR.M. et al. 2009. Ultrahigh‐resolution seismic reflection imaging of the Alpine Fault, New Zealand.Journal of Geophysical Research114.
    [Google Scholar]
24. KrawczykC.M., PolomU., TrabsS. and DahmT.2012. Sinkholes in the city of Hamburg—New urban shear‐wave reflection seismic system enables high‐resolution imaging of sub‐erosion structures.Journal of Applied Geophysics78, 133–143.
    [Google Scholar]
25. KrawczykC., PolomU. and BeileckeT.2013. Shear‐wave reflection seismics as a valuable tool for near‐surface urban applications.The Leading Edge32, 256–263.
    [Google Scholar]
26. InazakiT.2012. Development and utilization of an S‐wave type land streamer for high‐resolution reflection surveying.74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
27. LundbergE., MalehmirA., JuhlinC., BastaniM. and AnderssonM.2014. High‐resolution 3D reflection seismic investigation over a quickclay landslide scar in southwest Sweden.Geophysics79(2), B97–B107.
    [Google Scholar]
28. MalehmirA., DahlinP., LundbergE., JuhlinC., SjöströmH. and HögdahlK.2011. Reflection seismic investigations in the Dannemora area, central Sweden: insights into the geometry of poly‐phase deformation zones and magnetite‐skarn deposits.Journal of Geophysical Research116, B11307.
    [Google Scholar]
29. MalehmirA., BastaniM., KrawzyckC., GurkM., IsmailN., PolomU. et al. 2013a. Geophysical assessment and geotechnical investigation of quick‐clay landslides—A Swedish case study.Near Surface Geophysics11, 341–350.
    [Google Scholar]
30. MalehmirA., SaleemM.U. and BastaniM.2013b. High‐resolution reflection seismic investigations of quick‐clay and associated formations at a landslide scar in southwest Sweden.Journal of Applied Geophysics92, 84–102.
    [Google Scholar]
31. MalehmirA., WangS., LamminenJ., BrodicB., BastaniM., VaittinenK. et al. 2015a. Delineating structures controlling sandstone‐hosted base‐metal deposits using high‐resolution multicomponent and radio‐magnetotelluric methods, a case study from northern Sweden.Geophysical Prospecting63, 774–797.
    [Google Scholar]
32. MalehmirA., ZhangF., DehghannejadM., LundbergE., DöseC., FribergO. et al. 2015b. Planning of urban underground infrastructure using a broadband seismic landstreamer—Tomography results and uncertainty quantifications from a case study in southwestern Sweden.Geophysics80, B177–B192.
    [Google Scholar]
33. MalehmirA., AnderssonM., MehtaS., BrodicB., MunierR., PlaceJ. et al. 2016a. Post‐glacial reactivation of the Bollnäs fault, central Sweden—A multidisciplinary geophysical investigation.Solid Earth7, 509–527.
    [Google Scholar]
34. L.Nielsen
    MalehmirA., SoccoL.V., BastaniM., KrawczykC.M., PfaffhuberA.A., MillerR.D. et al. 2016b. Near‐surface geophysical characterization of areas prone to natural hazards: a review of the current and perspective on the future. In: Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 57 (ed L.Nielsen ), pp. 51–146.
    [Google Scholar]
35. MalehmirA., HeinonenS., DehgahnnejadM., HeinoP., MariesG., KarellF. et al. 2017. Landstreamer seismics and physical property measurements in the Siilinjärvi open‐pit apatite (phosphate) mine, central Finland.Geophysics82, B29–B48.
    [Google Scholar]
36. MartíD., CarbonellR., FlechaI., PalomerasI., Font‐CapoJ., Vazquez‐SunéE. et al. 2008. High‐resolution seismic characterisation in an urban area: subway tunnel construction in Barcelona, Spain.Geophysics74, B41–B50.
    [Google Scholar]
37. MartinezK. and AlfredoM.J.2011. Urban seismic site investigations for a new metro in central Copenhagen: near surface imaging using reflection refraction and VSP methods.Physics and Chemistry of the Earth36, 1228–1236.
    [Google Scholar]
38. MillerR., PullanS., WaldnerJ. and HaeniF.1986. Field comparison of shallow seismic sources.Geophysics51, 2067–2092.
    [Google Scholar]
39. MillerR.D., BradfordJ.H. and HolligerK.2010. Advances in Near‐ surface seismology and ground‐penetrating radar.Geophysical Developments Series, No. 15.
    [Google Scholar]
40. PalmerD.2006. Refraction traveltime and amplitude corrections for very near‐surface inhomogeneities.Geophysical Prospecting54, 589–604.
    [Google Scholar]
41. PlaceJ.A.P., MalehmirA., HögdahlK., JuhlinC. and Persson NilssonK.2015. Seismic characterization of the Grängesberg iron deposit and its mining‐induced structures, central Sweden.Interpretation3, SY41–SY56.
    [Google Scholar]
42. PlaceJ.A.P. and MalehmirA.2016. Using supervirtual first arrivals in controlled‐source hardrock seismic imaging—Well worth the effort.Geophysical Journal International206, 716–730.
    [Google Scholar]
43. R.D.Miller
    PolomU., HansenL., SauvinG., L’HeureuxJ‐S., LecomteI., KrawczykC.M. et al. 2010. High‐resolution SH‐wave seismic reflection for characterization of onshore ground conditions in the Trondheim Harbor, central Norway. In:Advances in Near‐Surface Seismology and Ground‐Penetrating Radar (eds R.D.Miller , J.H.Bradford and K.Holliger ), Geophysical Developments Series 15, 297–312.
    [Google Scholar]
44. PolomU., HofstedeC., DiezA. and EisenO.2012. Shallow shear wave reflection seismic on firn and ice—Insights, challenges and opportunities from a small scale experiment at Colle Gnifetti.EAGE 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
45. PuginA.J., LarsonT.H., SargentS.L., McBrideJ.H. and BexfieldC.E.2004. Near‐surface mapping using SH‐wave and P‐wave seismic land‐streamer data acquisition in Illinois, U.S.The Leading Edge23, 677–682.
    [Google Scholar]
46. PuginA.J.M., PullanS.E., HunterJ.A. and OldenborgerG.A.2009. Hydrogeological prospecting using P‐ and S‐wave landstreamer seismic reflection methods.Near Surface Geophysics7, 315–327.
    [Google Scholar]
47. PuginA.J.M., PullanS. and HunterJ.A.2013. Shear‐wave high‐resolution seismic reflection in Ottawa and Quebec City, Canada.The Leading Edge32, 250–255.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Salas‐RomeroS., MalehmirA., SnowballI., Lougheed BryanC., HellqvistM. and TorranceK.2015. Preconditions to Swedish quick clay landslides identified by geophysical borehole and core data.Landslide.
    [Google Scholar]
49. SloanS.D., TsofliasG.P., SteeplesD.W. and VincentP.D.2007. Highresolution ultra‐shallow subsurface imaging by integrating near‐surface seismic reflection and ground‐penetrating radar data in the depth domain.Journal of Applied Geophysics62, 281–286.
    [Google Scholar]
50. SchmelzbachC., GreenA.G. and HorstmeyerH.2005. Ultra‐shallow seismic reflection imaging in a region characterized by high source‐generated noise.Near Surface Geophysics3, 33–46.
    [Google Scholar]
51. SchmelzbachC., HorstmeyerH. and JuhlinC.2007. Shallow 3D seismic‐reflection imaging of fracture zones in crystalline rock.Geophysics72, B149–B160.
    [Google Scholar]
52. SollbergerD., SchmelzbachC., HorstmeyerH., ReiserF., RabensteinL., MaurerH. et al. 2014. Mapping near surface‐elastic parameters of Quaternary sediments using multicomponent seismic techniques.Geophysical Research Abstracts16, 4014.
    [Google Scholar]
53. SteeplesD. and MillerR.1998. Avoiding pitfalls in shallow seismic reflection surveys.Geophysics63, 1213–1224.
    [Google Scholar]
54. StümpelH., KahlerS., MeissnerR. and MilkereiB.1984. The use of seismic shear waves and compressional waves for lithological problems of shallow sediments.Journal of Geophysical Prospecting32, 660–675.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Trafikverket.2016. http://www.trafikverket.se/varbergstunneln. Accessed: 27 June September 2016.
56. van der VeenM. and GreenA.G.1998. Land streamer for shallow seismic data acquisition: evaluation of gimbal‐mounted geophones.Geophysics63, 1408–1413.
    [Google Scholar]
57. van der VeenM., BunessH.A., BükerF. and GreenA.G.2000. Field comparison of high frequency seismic sources for imaging shallow (10‐250 m) structures.Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics5, 39–56.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Vangkilde‐PedersenT., RasmussenE.S. and KristensenM.2012. Detailed mapping of Miocene sand‐rich deposits in Denmark with high resolution 2D landstreamer vibroseis.First Break30, 45–50.
    [Google Scholar]
59. WangS., MalehmirA. and BastaniM.2016. Geophysical characterization of areas prone to quick‐clay landslides using radio‐magnetotelluric and seismic methods.Tectonophysics677–678, 248–260.
    [Google Scholar]
60. YordkayhunS., TryggvasonA., NordenB., JuhlinC. and BergmanB.2009. 3D seismic traveltime tomography imaging of the shallow subsurface at the CO2SINK project site, Ketzin, Germany.Geophysics74, G1–G15.
    [Google Scholar]