1887

Abstract

Summary

A well-known pressure transient derivative signature in dual-porosity fractured reservoirs shows stabilization preceded by a dip. Such signature allows in principle estimation of a dynamic matrix block size. In many case however, dual porosity fractured reservoirs do not display a clear dip in the pressure derivative. In this work we investigate the causes of the absence of characteristic dual medium signatures for tight gas reservoirs. A list of possible explanations includes dual medium signature hidden by wellbore storage, test too short to observe the dual medium signature, dual medium signature partially suppressed or smoothed by transient effects, and a matrix block size given by a probability density function. These hypotheses were all investigated using pressure transient analysis and reservoir simulation. It is concluded that most likely the presence of transient effects may explain the absence of a clear dual medium signature in the derivative. This may be enhanced by the presence of a distribution of block sizes. The understanding of the reasons behind the weak observed dip helps in applying the right PTA analysis model, and prevents estimating, for example, wrong fracture porosities that may result from calculation using storativity ratios obtain from wrongly used steady-state pressure transient models.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700651
2017-06-12
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cinco-Ley, H., Samaniego, V. and Kucuk, F.
    [1985] The pressure transient behavior for naturally fractured reservoirs with multiple block size. Paper SPE 14168 presented at the 60th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Las Vegas, NV, September 22–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, Z.-X.
    [1989] Transient flow of slightly compressible fluids through double porosity, double permeability systems — A state of the art review. Transport in Porous Media, 4, 147–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kazemi, H.
    [1969] Pressure transient analysis of naturally fractured reservoirs with uniform fracture distribution, Soc Pet Eng J., Dec., 451–462; Trans AIME246.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuchuk, F. and Biryukov, D.
    [2014] Pressure-transient behavior of continuously and discretely fractured reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, February, paper SPE 158096, 82–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Warren, J.R. & Root, P.J.
    [1963] The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., September, 245–255; Trans. AIME228.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700651
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700651
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error