1887

Abstract

Summary

Estimating the reservoir properties from surface seismic data for a target below a complex overburden is a challenging problem. One of the approaches is to apply reservoir-oriented local inversion schemes on the redatumed local reflection response. In this paper, we propose a process to estimate the reservoir impulse responses (redatumed reflection response) in a complex overburden setting for realistic data with angle-dependent or angle vs ray parameter (AVP) characteristics. The impulse responses are estimated using Joint Migration Inversion (JMI) followed by sparsity constrained Proximity Transformation. It comprises a full wavefield approach in the sense that it correctly accounts for all internal multiples and transmission effects. As a result, the estimated impulse responses are free of interference related to internal multiples in the overburden. The process involves a noval procedure to estimate the propagation velocity model using the flexibility in the JMI parameterization. We finally show that this proposed JMI redatuming provides a much more reliable local reflection response, compared to standard redatuming based on time reversal of recorded data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700672
2017-06-12
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A.J.
    [2014a] Review paper: An outlook on the future seismic imaging, Part I: forward and reverse modelling. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 911–930.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2014b] Review paper: An outlook on the future seismic imaging, Part III: Joint Migration Inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 62(5), 950–971.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beryhill, J.R.
    [1984] Wave-equation datuming before stack. Geophysics, 49, 2064–2066.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davydenko, M. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2017] Full-wavefield migration: using surface and internal multiples in imaging. Geophysical Prospecting, 65(1), 7–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Garg, A. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2016] Reservoir impulse response estimation using Joint Migration Inversion. EAGE, Eur. Ass. of Geosc. and Eng., Expanded abstracts, Vienna, 4pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gisolf, A. and van den Berg, P.M.
    [2010] Target-oriented non-linear inversion of time-lapse seismic data. SEG, Soc. Expl. Geophys., Expanded abstracts, 2860–2864.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. van der Neut, J. and Herrmann, F.J.J.
    [2013] Interferometric redatuming by sparse inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 192, 666–670.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Schuster, G.T. and Zhou, M.
    [2006] A theoretical overview of model-based and correlation-based redatuming methods. Geophysics, 71, SI103–SI110.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Staal, X.R.
    [2015] Combined imaging and velocity estimation by Joint Migration Inversion. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wapenaar, K., Cox, H.L.H. and Berkhout, A.J.
    [1992] Elastic redatuming of multicomponent seismic data. Geophysical Prospecting, 40, 465–482.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wapenaar, K., Thorbecke, J., van der Neut, J., Brogini, F., Slob, E. and Sneider, R.
    [2014] Marchenko Imaging. Geophysics, 79, WA39–WA57.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700672
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700672
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error