1887

Abstract

Summary

In reservoir modelling it is not only important to infer the spatial distribution of the elastic properties to better characterize the reservoir and to generate more consistence geological models. It is also utmost important to characterize the internal architecture of the reservoir. Therefore, the resulting subsurface geological models should reproduce the tectonic deformation and discontinuities (e.g. folds and faults) and the stratigraphic features that are visible in the original seismic data. Since normally there is not a geological structural and stratigraphic constrain of traditional geostatistical seismic inversion procedures, these geological elements are no always well reproduced in the resulting petro-elastic models. The methodology proposed herein, aim to combine seismic inversion and seismic attributes, into a unified inversion framework to improve the resulting petro-elastic models in terms of structural and stratigraphic geology. The integration of structural and stratigraphic seismic attributes into the objective function allows a better reproduction of these geological elements. This methodology was successfully applied to a real case study. Constraining the seismic inversion procedure to seismic attributes, it generate a more consistent and reliable geological subsurface model and help to better reproduce the internal architecture and sedimentary sequences inside the reservoir.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700712
2017-06-12
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bosh, M., Mukerji, T. and Gonzalez, E.F.
    [2010] Seismic Inversion for Reservoir Properties Combining Statistical Rock Physics and Geostatistics: A Review:Geophysics, 75, 75A165–75A176.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.
    [2005] Seismic attributes — A historical perspective. Geophysics, 70(5), 3SO-28SO.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Nunes, R., and Almeida, J.A.
    [2010] Parallelization of sequential gaussian, indicator and direct simulation algorithms:Computers & Geosciences, 36, 1042–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nunes, R., Soares, A., AzevedoL. and Pereira, P.
    [2016] Geostatistical Seismic Inversion with Direct Sequential Simulation and Co-simulation with Multi-local Distribution Functions:Mathematical Geosciences, First Online.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Soares, A.
    [2001] Direct Sequential Simulation and Cosimulation:Mathematical Geology, 33, 911–926.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Soares, A., DietJ.D. and Guerreiro, L.
    [2007] Stochastic Inversion with a Global Perturbation Method: Petroleum Geostatistics Conference, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, A10.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Taner, M.
    [2001] Seismic Attributes. CSEG Recorder, 26(7), 49–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tarantola, A.
    [2005] Inverse Problem Theory: SIAM.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700712
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700712
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error