1887

Abstract

Summary

Full-waveform inversion (FWI) relies on accurate estimation of signal amplitudes in order to produce reliable and practical results. Approximations made during the inversion process, as well as unknown or incomplete information, cause amplitude mismatch effects at various levels: shot gather absolute magnitude, trace-by-trace scaling and time-varying relative amplitudes. Rewriting the problem in an amplitude free formulation allows to mitigate the amplitude ambiguity and improve successful convergence. We present strategies to eliminate shot-gather and trace-by-trace amplitude uncertainty; we derive update directions, compare and analyze the effect of each of the normalization schemes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700720
2017-06-12
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Haber, E., Chung, M. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2012] An effective method for parameter estimation with PDE constraints with multiple right hand sides. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 22(3).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Rajagopalan, S.
    [1987] The use of ‘Automatic Gain Control’ to display vertical magnetic gradient data. Exploration Geophysics, 18(1/2), 166–169.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Versteeg, R.
    [1994] The Marmousi experience; velocity model determination on a synthetic complex data set. The Leading Edge, 13(9), 927–936.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    [2009] An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. GEOPHYSICS, 74(5), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700720
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700720
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error