1887

Abstract

Summary

Since the distribution of different causative geophysical attributes are relevant, we develop a new joint inversion algorithm based on local correlation constraints. A window function is introduced to the Pearson correlation coefficient to measure linear correlations of each windowed subarea, in which the physical attributes are assumed to be linearly correlated. With the objective functional incorporating the correlation constraints decreasing in the iterative optimization process, the similarity of geophysical models with different attributes enhances gradually. We test our joint inversion algorithm on three-dimensional synthetic MT and gravity data. The results show that the new algorithm can effectively exploit different geophysical data for resolving the underground structures. Compared to single MT or gravity inversions, the joint inversion results deliver the accurate attribute values and the positions of underground structures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700790
2017-06-12
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ColomboD, MantovaniM, HallinanS
    , et al. 2008. Sub-basalt depth imaging using simultaneous joint inversion of seismic and electromagnetic (MT) data: a CRB field study[C]//2008 SEG Annual Meeting. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fisher, R.A.
    1915. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika. 10 (4): 507–521. doi: 10.1093/biomet/10.4.507
    https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/10.4.507 [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallardo LA, MejuM A.
    2003. Characterization of heterogeneous near-surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data. Geophysical Research Letters, 30(13).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gallardo LA, MejuM A
    . 2004. Joint two-dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross-gradients constraints. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109(B3).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gayen, A.K.
    1951. “The frequency distribution of the product moment correlation coefficient in random samples of any size draw from non-normal universes”. Biometrika. 38: 219–247. doi: 10.1093/biomet/38.1‑2.219.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/3 8.1-2.219 [Google Scholar]
  6. HaberE, OldenburgD.
    1997. Joint inversion: A structural approach. Inverse problems, 13(1): 63.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LelièvreP G, FarquharsonC G, HurichC A
    . 2012. Joint inversion of seismic traveltimes and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration[J]. Geophysics, 77(1): K1–K15.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SunJ, LiY.
    2012. Joint inversion of multiple geophysical data: A petrophysical approach using guided fuzzy c-means clustering// 2012 SEG Annual Meeting. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700790
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700790
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error