1887

Abstract

Summary

Air gun arrays are the most common marine seismic sources and knowledge of their directional source signature is essential in several reflection seismology areas. Having the far-field signatures for different angles, it is possible to get higher quality seismic images by removing the source signature variation effects. It is challenging to measure far-field source signatures directly and therefore other methods are developed to estimate directional far-field signatures. Using near-field measurements for calculation of far-field signatures is a common technique. This method requires pressure measurements near each air gun in the array. On the other hand acoustic pressures of individual air guns reflected from sea surface can drop the hydrostatic pressure around the array and generate underwater vapor cavities. In this paper numerical simulation which is validated by field data is used to show the effects of several cavity collapses on the hydrophones used for near field measurements. Including other source of pressure fluctuations than the air guns and ghost signals, it is possible to better estimate the notional source signatures and eventually having better far-field array source signature computation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700845
2017-06-12
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amundsen, L.
    , 2000. Linear inversion for source signatures from ministreamer data. The Leading Edge, 19(1), pp.40–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Behura, J. and Snieder, R.
    , 2013. Virtual real source: Source signature estimation using seismic interferometry. Geophysics, 78(5), pp.Q57–Q68.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Francois, R. E. and Garrison, G. R.
    , (1982). “Sound absorption based on ocean measurements. Part II: Boric acid contribution and equation for total absorption,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 72(6), 1879–1890.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Frohly, J., Labouret, S., Bruneel, C., Looten-Baquet, I. and Torguet, R.
    , (2000). “Ultrasonic cavitation monitoring by acoustic noise power measurement,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 108(5), pp.2012–2020.)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Landrø, M., Amundsen, L., & Barker, D.
    , (2011). “High-frequency signals from air-gun arrays,” Geophysics, 76(4), Q19–Q27.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Landrø, M., Amundsen, L., & Langhammer, J.
    , (2013). “Repeatability issues of high-frequency signals emitted by air-gun arrays,” Geophysics, 78(6), P19–P27.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Landrø, M., Ni, Y., & Amundsen, L.
    , (2016). “Reducing high-frequency ghost cavitation signals from marine airgun arrays,” Geophysics, 81(3), P33–P46.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Landrø, M., Strandenes, S. and Vaage, S.
    , 1991. Use of near-field measurements to compute far-field marine source signatures-Evaluation of the method. First break, 9(8), pp.375–385.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Laws, R., Landrø, M. and Amundsen, L.
    , 1998. An experimental comparison of three direct methods of marine source signature estimation. Geophysical prospecting, 46(4), pp.353–389.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Parkes, G.E., Ziolkowski, A., Hatton, L. and Haugland, T.
    , 1984. The signature of an air gun array: Computation from near-field measurements including interactions-practical considerations. Geophysics, 49(2), pp.105–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Versluis, M., Schmitz, B., von der Heydt, A., & Lohse, D.
    (2000). “How snapping shrimp snap: through cavitating bubbles,” Science, 289(5487), 2114–2117.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams, R.G. and Pollatos, J.
    , 2012. Signal to noise—the key to increased marine seismic bandwidth. First Break, 30(11).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ziolkowski, A., Parkes, G., Hatton, L. and Haugland, T.
    , 1982. The signature of an air gun array: Computation from near-field measurements including interactions. Geophysics, 47(10), pp.1413–1421.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700845
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700845
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error