1887

Abstract

Summary

Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) is a promising high-resolution tomography model, but the conventional L2 formulation suffers from cycle-skipping issue. This has led to many propositions of alternative misfit functions to mitigate this problem in the literature. However, most of these propositions focus on this single issue. In this work, we propose some key properties that alternative misfit functions should satisfy for going toward real data application. It is acknowledged that for real data application, the classical L2 waveform misfit is still widely used. Through a review of the literature and simple numerical examples, we assess some key features of several alternative misfit functions formulated in the time domain. These tested alternative strategies mitigate the requirement of an accurate initial model but show significant limitations for their systematic use. Accordingly, future research in this direction is still required for finding a robust and efficient substitute to L2 waveform misfit.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701001
2017-06-12
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bozdağ, E., Trampert, J. and Tromp, J.
    [2011] Misfit functions for full waveform inversion based on instantaneous phase and envelope measurements. Geophysical Journal International, 185(2), 845–870.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bunks, C., Salek, F.M., Zaleski, S. and Chavent, G.
    [1995] Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics, 60(5), 1457–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Donno, D., Chauris, H. and Calandra, H.
    [2013] Estimating the Background Velocity Model with the Normalized Integration Method. In: EAGE Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2013. Tu0704.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu, J., Chauris, H. and Calandra, H.
    [2011] The normalized integration method — an alternative to full waveform inversion? In: Expanded Abstracts. EAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Luo, J. and Wu, R.S.
    [2015] Seismic envelope inversion: reduction of local minima and noise resistance. Geophysical Prospecting, 63, 597–614.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Luo, S. and Sava, P.
    [2011] A deconvolution-based objective function for wave-equation inversion. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 30(1), 2788–2792.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tarantola, A.
    [1984] Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49(8), 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tejero, C.J., Dagnino, D., Sallarès, V. and Ranero, C.R.
    [2015] Comparative study of objective functions to overcome noise and bandwidth limitations in full waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 203(1), 632–645.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. van Leeuwen, T. and Mulder, W.A.
    [2010] A correlation-based misfit criterion for wave-equation traveltime tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 182(3), 1383–1394.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    [2009] An overview of full waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Warner, M. and Guasch, L.
    [2014] Adaptative Waveform Inversion — FWI without Cycle Skipping — Theory. In: 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014. We E106 13.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wu, R.S., Luo, J. and Wu, B.
    [2014] Seismic envelope inversion and modulation signal model. Geophysics, 79(3), WA13–WA24.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701001
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701001
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error