1887

Abstract

Summary

Full waveform inversion (FWI) needs quite a lot of hard disk space because of storing the source wavefield. To avoid storing source wavefield , people often use efficient boundary storage strategy. In the case of three dimension, however, this method still has much storage. In order to improve this problem, we improved the storage method by compressing the wavefield on the basis of the efficient boundary storage strategy. We compress the wavefield of each moment of boundary and the wavefield of the last moment of target area. When calculating the gradient, the compressed wavefield are decompressed to reconstruct the source wavefield, and delete the used wavefield along with the reconstruction. Through this process to achieve the purpose of reducing storage. A 3D simulating model and four shots field data of a sea are used to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of this improved method. By comparing the storage of traditional method and improved method, the results show that the improved storing method could decrease considerable storage in 3D FWI, and has a better effect in real seismic data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701008
2017-06-12
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bunks, C., Saleck, F.M., Zaleski, S. and Chavent, G.
    [1995] Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics, 60(5), 1457–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. GravesR W.
    [1996] Simulating seismic wave propagation in 3d elastic media using staggered grid finite difference. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(4), 1091–1106.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lailly, P.
    [1983] The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migrations:Conference on Inverse Scattering, Theory and Application, Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Expanded Abstracts, 206–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. NguyenB D, McMechanG A.
    [2014] Five ways to avoid storing source wavefield snapshots in 2D elastic prestack reverse time migration. Geophysics, 80(1), S1–S18.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pratt, R.G., Shin, C. and Hicks, G.J.
    [1998] Gauss-newton and full newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 133(2), 341–362.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Shin, C. and ChaY.H.
    [2008] Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain. Geophysical Journal International, 173(3), 922–931.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tarantola, A.
    [1984] Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 49(8), 1259–1256.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. VighD, StarrB, KapoorJ
    , et al. [2010] 3D full waveform inversion on a Gulf of Mexico WAZ data set, 2010 SEG Annual Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. WangB L, GaoJ H, ChenW C
    , et al. [2012] Efficient boundary storage strategies for seismic reverse time migration. Diqiu Wuli Xuebao, 55(7), 2412–2421.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. YangX, TanX, ShiW
    , et al. [2011] Compression Algorithm for Aeroengine Test Data. Computer and Management (CAMAN), 2011 International Conference on. IEEE, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701008
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error