1887

Abstract

Summary

We present a structural modeling method that uses an object model of fault to produce consistent fault-related deformations.

Our numerical fault operator relies on geometric and kinematic parameters that are determined by numerical optimization to fitting interpretations points in the fault neighborhood.

We use our operator sequentially to model faults that have been affected by more recent faulting events.

The method can be used to explore uncertainties about the chronology of the different faulting events.

We illustrate our workflow to model the top of a faulted basement located offshore Morocco.

This basement reservoir analogue is imaged by 2D seismic lines and the relative ages of the two fault families are uncertain.

We applied our method to build three different scenarios.

In one of the scenarios, removing the displacement of the younger strike-slip fault enables us to correlate fault sticks that seem isolated in the present day geometry.

The modeled faults have larger lateral extensions, leading to a more compartmentalized reservoir.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701146
2017-06-12
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnett, J.A., Mortimer, J., Rippon, J.H., Walsh, J.J. and Watterson, J.
    [1987] Displacement geometry in the volume containing a single normal fault. AAPG Bulletin, 71(8), 925–937.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cardozo, N. and Aanonsen, S.
    [2009] Optimized trishear inverse modeling. Journal of Structural Geology, 31(6), 546–560.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cherpeau, N. and Caumon, G.
    [2015] Stochastic structural modelling in sparse data situations. Petroleum Geoscience, 21(4), 233–247.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Coelho, S., Passchier, C. and Grasemann, B.
    [2005] Geometric description of flanking structures. Journal of Structural Geology, 27(4), 597–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Eberhart, R.C. and Kennedy, J.
    [1995] A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science, 1. New York, NY, 39–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Georgsen, F., Røe, P., Syversveen, A.R. and Lia, O.
    [2012] Fault displacement modelling using 3D vector fields. Computational Geosciences, 16(2), 247–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Grasemann, B., Martel, S. and Passchier, C.
    [2005] Reverse and normal drag along a fault. Journal of Structural Geology, 27(6), 999–1010.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Laurent, G., Caumon, G., Bouziat, A. and Jessell, M.
    [2013] A parametric method to model 3D displacements around faults with volumetric vector fields. Tectonophysics, 590, 83–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nixon, C.W., Sanderson, D.J. and Bull, J.M.
    [2011] Deformation within a strike-slip fault network at Westward Ho!, Devon UK: Domino vs conjugate faulting. Journal of Structural Geology, 33(5), 833–843.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Petford, N. and McCaffrey, K.
    [2003] Hydrocarbons in crystalline rocks: an introduction. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 214(1), 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tvedt, A.B., Rotevatn, A., Jackson, C.A.L., Fossen, H. and Gawthorpe, R.L.
    [2013] Growth of normal faults in multilayer sequences: A 3D seismic case study from the Egersund Basin, Norwegian North Sea. Journal of Structural Geology, 55, 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Walter, B.
    [2016] Réservoirs de socle en contexte extensif: Genèse, géométries et circulations de fluides. Exemples du rift intracontinental du Lac Albert (Ouganda) et de la marge proximale d’Ifni (Maroc). Ph.D. thesis, Université de Lorraine.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701146
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701146
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error