1887

Abstract

Summary

Developing microphysics-based laws to describe the rheology of dense granular media will be catalytic to a number of problems such as earthquake hazard forecasting. However, current understanding of the link between particle-scale phenomena and macroscopic frictional behavior is limited, as real time imaging of the microscale under geologically relevant conditions is quite demanding. Here, we study the spatial distribution of acoustic emissions (AE) associated with stick slip instabilities in sheared granular layers, in order to better understand the energy budget of deforming fault gouge. Results show the existence of fixed as well as migrating sites that nucleate AE activity, as opposed to randomly placed events. Highly concentrated groups of AEs were observed in experiments with significant particle size reduction. The non-random distribution of AEs confirms that the microstructural state of sheared granular layers during unstable sliding is not homogeneous and evolves with ongoing shear. The sites where failure initiates might be controlled by the stress boundary conditions, but memory effects shared among particles involved in previously failed load-bearing microstructures might play a role as well. These findings may provide a microphysical basis for phenomena such as repeating micro-earthquakes and migrating seismicity that are observed in natural fault zones.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701218
2017-06-12
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brace, W.F. and Byerlee, J.D.
    [1966] Stick-slip as a mechanism for earthquakes. Science, 153, 990–992.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chester, F.M. and Chester, J.S.
    [1998] Ultracataclasite structure and friction processes of the Punchbowl fault, San Andreas system, California. Tectonophysics, 295, 199–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Daniels, K.E and Hayman, N.W.
    [2008] Force chains in seismogenic faults visualized with photoelastic granular shear experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, B11411.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lei, X. and Ma, S.
    [2014] Laboratory acoustic emission study for earthquake generation process. Earthquake Science, 27(6), 624–646.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lockner, D.
    [1993] The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 30, 883–899.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Marone, C.
    [1998] Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 26, 643–696.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Michlmayr, G., Cohen, D. and Or, D.
    [2012] Sources and characteristics of acoustic emissions from mechanically stressed geologic media — A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 112, 97–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S.
    [2006] Numerical Optimization. Springer-Verlag, New York.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701218
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701218
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error