1887

Abstract

Summary

Continental Oceanic Boundary along conjugate passive margins is very important to understand the plate tectonics and reconstruction after breakup of Gondwana Supercontinent. Generally, mapping of COB needs rigorous modelling using different geophysical datasets. The basic criteria for identification of crustal types along such margins is difference in basement morphology associated with geophysical fields and bathymetry, varying from continent to ocean. In this paper, we proposed a novel, effective and enhanced methodology to correlate the geomorphological features of different crustal types using Tilt and Theta parameters of Bouguer Gravity. Correlation between them can be established by determining angles between the gradient directions of Tilt and Theta. Very small angles (∼ 0o) provides direct correlation, however, large angles (∼ 180o) give inverse correlation. Change in correlation from inverse to direct marks the COB location. We tested our new approach for South Atlantic conjugate margins i.e., Eastern Brazilian Margin (EBM) and West African Margin (WAM) regions. COB results along both EBM and WAM conjugate margins shows very good agreement with previous available results from plate reconstruction studies. The major features such as lineaments, ridges and Fractures Zones of both EBM and WAM margins also show a good correlation as outlined by this study.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701310
2017-06-12
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blaich, O. A., Faleide, J. I. and Tsikalas, F.
    2011. Crustal breakup and continent-ocean transition at South Atlantic conjugate margins, Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, B01402, doi: 10.1029/2010JB007686, 2011.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007686 [Google Scholar]
  2. FulleaJ., Fernandez, M., Zeyen, H.
    2008. FA2BOUG - A FORTRAN 90 code to compute Bouguer gravity anomalies from gridded free-air anomalies: Application to the Atlantic-Mediterranean transition zone, Computers & Geosciences34 (12), 1665–1681.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. JilinskiP., Meju MaxA., and Fontes, SergioL.
    2013. Demarcation of continental-oceanic transition zone using angular differences between gradients of geophysical fields, Geophysical Journal International, 195(1), P.276–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Maurya, V.P., Fontes, S.L., La Terra, E.F.
    , 2016. Application of COB Determination for Brazilian Eastern Continental Margin Using Correlation between Enhancement Images from High Resolution Satellite Altimetry Derived Gravity Data. AGU Fall meeting 2016, Abstract, San Francisco, California.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller, H.G. and Singh, V.
    , 1994. Potential field tilt-A newconcept for location of potential field sources, J. Appl. Geophys., 32, 213–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pawlowski, R.
    , 2008. The use of gravity anomaly data for offshore continental margin demarcation, The Leading Edge, 27(6), 722–727.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rabinowitz, P. D., and J. L.LaBrecque
    , 1979. The mesozoic South Atlantic Ocean and evolution of its continental margins, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 5973–6002, doi: 10.1029/JB084iB11p05973.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB11p05973 [Google Scholar]
  8. SandwellD. T. et al
    . 2014, New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure, Science346, 65; DOI: 10.1126/science.1258213
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258213 [Google Scholar]
  9. Wijns, C., Perez, C. and Kowalczyk, P.
    , 2005. Theta map: edge detection in magnetic data, Geophysics, 70, L39–L43.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701310
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701310
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error