1887

Abstract

Summary

Although theoretically straightforward, adapting focal deblending to realistic 5D acquisition scenarios can be challenging in practice. The two main issues that have to be dealt with are insufficiently sampled spatial dimensions and the computational effort needed for the deblending inversion. In order to deal with both issues, we propose dividing the data in ‘smart’ subsets, specialized for the acquisition type. Then, the deblending problem can be divided into a number of smaller problems that can be solved independently. The focal transform used for the deblending is also redefined to fit the geometry of the subsets. We examine the case of OBN acquisition and test the performance of the proposed scheme on numerically blended field data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701369
2017-06-12
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. van den Berg, E. and Friedlander, M.P.
    [2007] SPGL1: A solver for large-scale sparse reconstruction. Http://www.cs.ubc.ca/labs/scl/spgl1.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2008] Probing the Pareto frontier for basis pursuit solutions. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(2), 890–912.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkhout, A.J.
    [1982] Seismic migration, imaging of acoustic energy by wavefield extrapolation, A: Theoretical aspects. Elsevier (second edition).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [2008] Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition. The Leading Edge, 27(7), 924–938.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berkhout, A.J. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2010] Parameterization of seismic data using gridpoint responses. 80th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3344–3348.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Y.
    [2015] Deblending by iterative orthogonalization and seislet thresholding. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 53–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheng, J. and Sacchi, M.D.
    [2015] A fast rank-reduction algorithm for 3D deblending via randomized QR decomposition. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3830–3835.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gan, S., Wang, S., Chen, X. and Chen, Y.
    [2015] Deblending using a structural-oriented median filter. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 59–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Haacke, R., Hampson, G. and Golebiowski, B.
    [2015] Simultaneous shooting for sparse OBN 4D surveys and deblending using modified Radon operators. 77st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We N101 08.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ibrahim, A. and Sacchi, M.D.
    [2013] Simultaneous source separation using a robust Radon transform. Geophysics, 79(1), V1–V11.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kontakis, A. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2014] Deblending via sparsity-constrained inversion in the focal domain. 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Th ELI2 02.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. [2016] Focal deblending using smart subsets of towed streamer 5D data. 86th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 4612–4617.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kontakis, A., Verschuur, D.J. and Wu, S.
    [2016] Acquisition geometry-aware focal deblending. 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Th P4 05.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kutscha, H. and Verschuur, D.J.
    [2012] Data reconstruction via sparse double focal transformation: An overview. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 29(4), 53–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kutscha, H., Verschuur, D.J. and Berkhout, A.J.
    [2010] High resolution double focal transformation and its application to data reconstruction. 80th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3589–3593.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lin, T.T.Y. and Herrmann, F.J.
    [2009] Designing simultaneous acquisitions with compressive sensing. 71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, S006.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mahdad, A., Doulgeris, P. and Blacquière, G.
    [2011] Separation of blended data by iterative estimation and subtraction of blending interference noise. Geophysics, 76(3), Q9–Q17.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Robertsson, J.O.A., Amundsen, L., Pedersen, Å.S., Eggenberger, K., Andersson, F. and van Manen, D.J.
    [2016] Wavefield signal apparition: Simultaneous source separation. 86th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 102–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wason, H., Herrmann, F.J. and Lin, T.T.Y.
    [2011] Sparsity-promoting recovery from simultaneous data: a compressive sensing approach. 81st SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 6–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wason, H., Kumar, R., Herrmann, F.J. and Aravkin, A.Y.
    [2014] Source separation via SVD-free rank minimization in the hierarchical semi-separable representation. 84th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 120–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wu, S., Blacquière, G., and van Groenestijn, G.J.
    [2015] Shot repetition: an alternative approach to blending in marine seismic. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 120–126.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhan, C., Malik, R., Specht, J., Liu, Z. and Teixeira, D.
    [2015] Deblending of continuously recorded OBN data by subtraction integrated with a median filter. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 4673–4677.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701369
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701369
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error