1887

Abstract

Summary

Carbon capture and storage is gaining acceptance around the world as one of the means for CO2 emission reduction. As the technology is just emerging, there is a necessity to address arising issues from technical details to geological hazards to public liaison. Otway Project is the first Australian attempt to address these issues. Stage 2C of the Otway Project is designed to identify the lower limit of CO2 detectable by seismic monitoring in saline aquifers. In this paper, we show that designing seismic processing workflows using a combination of baseline field data and a synthetic finite-difference 4D dataset speeds up time-lapse seismic processing to provide express time-lapse images of the plume with excellent signal-to-noise ratio and repeatability in less than a week upon completion of the monitor acquisition. Obtained time-lapse seismic images allow detection and tracking of the evolution of a small CO2-rich plume injected into a saline aquifer at 1500 m depth.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701388
2017-06-12
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bergmann, P., Diersch, M., Götz, J., Ivandic, M., Ivanova, A., Juhlin, C., Kummerow, J., Liebscher, A., Lüth, S., Meekes, S., Norden, B., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., Wagner, F. M. and Zhang, F.
    [2016] Review on geophysical monitoring of CO2 injection at Ketzin, Germany. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering139, 112–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cook, P. J. E.
    [2014] Geologically Storing Carbon: Learning from the Otway Project Experience. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dance, T.
    [2013] Assessment and geological characterisation of the CO2CRC Otway Project CO2 storage demonstration site: From prefeasibility to injection. Marine and Petroleum Geology46, 251–269.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Glubokovskikh, S., Pevzner, R., Dance, T., Caspari, E., Popik, D., Shulakova, V. and Gurevich, B.
    [2016] Seismic monitoring of CO2 geosequestration: CO2CRC Otway case study using full 4D FDTD approach. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control49, 201–216.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. IEA.
    [2012] Energy Technology Perspectives. IEA/OECD, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ivandic, M., Juhlin, C., Lüth, S., Bergmann, P., Kashubin, A., Sopher, D., Ivanova, A., Baumann, G. and Henninges, J.
    [2015] Geophysical monitoring at the Ketzin pilot site for CO2 storage: New insights into the plume evolution. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control32, 90–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kragh, E. and Christie, P.
    [2002] Seismic repeatability, normalized rms, and predictability. The Leading Edge21(7), 640–647.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ringrose, P. S., Mathieson, A. S., Wright, I. W., Selama, F., Hansen, O., Bissell, R., Saoula, N. and Midgley, J.
    [2013] The In Salah CO2 Storage Project: Lessons Learned and Knowledge Transfer. Energy Procedia37, 6226–6236.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Roach, L. A. N., White, D. J. and Roberts, B.
    [2015] Assessment of 4D seismic repeatability and CO2 detection limits using a sparse permanent land array at the Aquistore CO2 storage site. GEOPHYSICS80(2), WA1–WA13.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Shulakova, V., Pevzner, R., Christian Dupuis, J., Urosevic, M., Tertyshnikov, K., Lumley, D. E. and Gurevich, B.
    [2015] Burying receivers for improved time-lapse seismic repeatability: CO2CRC Otway field experiment. Geophysical Prospecting63(1), 55–69.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701388
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701388
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error