1887

Abstract

Summary

Absorption in the Earth attenuates high frequency seismic signal progressively with depth, reducing resolution and limiting the interpretability of the data. While absorption may be corrected for in migration, for many geological settings this is not necessary and application of a post-migration Q compensation offers a flexible alternative. Conventional post-migration Q compensation methods often rely on artificial mechanisms to limit amplification of noise, at the cost of unintentionally restricting recovery of signal. In this paper we propose an amplitude Q compensation technique using 3D sparse inversion. Comparisons with a conventional approach on synthetic and field datasets highlight improved signal recovery and noise suppression with the proposed method. We also describe an extension to our technique which additionally accounts for spectral shifting effects inherent in seismic data after migration. Finally, we show how our method may be combined with spectral enhancement techniques to further broaden signal bandwidth.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701332
2017-06-12
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. van der Baan, M.
    [2012] Bandwidth enhancement by inverse-Q filtering or time-varying Wiener deconvolution?82nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Braga, I. L. S. and Moraes, F. S.
    [2013] High-resolution gathers by inverse Q filtering in the wavelet domain. Geophysics, 78(2), V53–V61.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jafar Gandomi, A. and Hoeber, H.
    [2016] AVA compliant pre-stack spectral enhancement. 86th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1844–1848.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Khalil, A., Hoeber, H., Jafar Gandomi, A. and de Pierrepont, S.
    [2015] Wavefield driven reservoir analysis. 85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3362–3366.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lin, T., Wan, Z., Zhang, B., Guo, S., Marfurt, K. and Guo, Y.
    [2013] Spectral decomposition of time- vs. depth-migrated data. 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1384–1388.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Peng, C., Bai, B., Liu, Y. and Fu, Z.
    [2016] Structurally Conformal Resolution Enhancement with Joint Sparse Inversion. 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Poole, G., Cooper, J., King, S. and Wang, P.
    [2015] 3D Source Designature Using Source-receiver Symmetry in the Shot Tau-px-py Domain. 77th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Trad, D., Ulrych, T. and Sacchi, M.
    [2003] Latest Views of the Sparse Radon Transform. Geophysics, 68(1), 386–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, Y.
    [2008] Inverse-Q filtered migration. Geophysics, 73(1), S1–S6.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Xia, G.
    [2005] Proper time-referencing for prestack Q estimation and compensation. 67th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Xin, K., Hung, B., Birdus, S. and Sun, J.
    [2008] 3-D tomographic amplitude inversion for compensating amplitude attenuation in the overburden. 78th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3239–3243.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701332
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701332
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error