1887
Volume 15 Number 5
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Ground‐based detailed magnetic surveys have so far been minimally used in permafrost research but they have a great potential to explore near‐surface structures and to reveal their hidden features. This study presents the results of a two‐elevation magnetic survey on a Pleistocene ice complex covered by Holocene deposits and penetrated by ice wedges. A polygonal pattern, which is not distinctly visible on the surface, is successfully identified in the anomalous magnetic field. Obtained data allow to allocate confidently the polygon distribution and to discriminate the ice wedges of different thicknesses. Typical values of total magnetic field anomalies related to ice wedges and frozen sediments in between are about several nanoteslas measured at the elevations of 0.4 and 1.15 m above the surface. Magnetic susceptibility of the permafrost samples is on the order of 10‐4. Observed data were modelled using a numerical magnetic model to estimate quantitatively geometrical and magnetic parameters of the ice complex structure. The best‐fitting model provides the following results: the upper part of the Pleistocene and Holocene ice wedges shows a thickness of 8 and 3 m, respectively, and the upper boundary of the Pleistocene ice wedges where they contact with Holocene wedges rests at 1 m depth. The magnetic susceptibility of frozen sediments between ice wedges is about 0.14 × 10‐3. An anomalously high vertical gradient within the study area has been observed. The presumable sources for this anomaly were considered. Our results suggest that detailed magnetometry could be efficient as it is a rapid and non‐invasive reconnaissance permafrost research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017016
2017-04-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BeckerH. and FassbinderJ.W.E.2001. Magnetic Prospecting in Archaeological Sites. Monuments and Sites VI.ICOMOS, 104 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BolshiyanovD., MakarovA. and Savelieva L, 2015. Lena River delta formation during the Holocene.Biogeosciences12(2), 579–593.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ButlerS.L. and SinhaG.2012. Forward modeling of applied geophysics methods using Comsol and comparison with analytical and laboratory analog models.Computational Geosciences42, 168–176.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. FrenchH.M.2007. The Periglacial Environment,3rd ed. Chichester, UK: John Willey and Sons, 478 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GrigorievM.N.1993. Cryomorphogenesis of the Lena River Mouth Area.Yakutsk: Permafrost Institute Press SB RAS, 176 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. HalletB. and WaddingtonE.1992. Buoyancy forces induced by freeze–thaw in the active layer: implications for diapirism and soil circulation. In: Periglacial Geomorphology. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Binghamton Symposium in Geomorphology (eds. J.C.Dixon and A.D.Abrahams ). Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons, pp. 251–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HalletB.1998. Measurement of soil motion in sorted circles, western Spitsbergen. Permafrost.Seventh International Conference, Proceedings.Yellowknife, Canada, pp. 415–420.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HodgettsL., DawsonP. and EastaughE.2011. Archaeological magnetometry in an Arctic setting: a case study from Maguse Lake, Nunavut.Journal of Archaeological Sciences38, 1754–1762.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HorsleyT.J. and DockrillS.J.2002. A preliminary assessment of the use of routine geophysical techniques for the location, characterization and interpretation of buried archaeology in Iceland.Archaeologica Islandica2, 10–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KvammeK.L.2006. Magnetometry: nature’s gift to archaeology. In: Remote Sensing in Archaeology: an Explicitly North American Perspective (ed. J.K.Johnson ), pp. 205–234. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. LandryD.B., FergusonI.J., MilneI.J. and ParkR.W.2015. Combined geophysical approach in a complex Arctic archaeological environment: a case study from the LdFa‐1 site, southern Baffin Island, Nunavut.Archaeological Prospection22, 157–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. SchirrmeisterL., KunitskyV., GrosseG., WetterichS., MeyerH., SchwambornG., BabiyO., DerevyaginA. and SiegertC.2011. Sedimentary characteristics and origin of the late Pleistocene ice complex on north‐east Siberian Arctic coastal lowlands and islands—A review.Quaternary International—Timing and Vegetation History of Past Interglacials in Northern Eurasia241, 3–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SchirrmeisterL., FroeseD., TumskoyV., GrosseG. and WetterichS.2013. Yedoma: Late Pleistocene Ice‐Rich Syngenetic Permafrost of Beringia. In: The Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science, Vol. 3 (ed. S.A.Elias ), pp. 542–552.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SiewertM. B., HugeliusG., HeimB. and FaucherreS.2016. Landscape controls and vertical variability of soil organic carbon storage in permafrost‐affected soils of the Lena River Delta.Catena147, 725–741.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Solov’evP.A.1959. Permafrost Zones of the Northern Part of the Lena‐Amga Watershed (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka, 142 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LonsdaleK.1949. Diamagnetic susceptibility and anisotropy of ice.Nature164, 101.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SpektorV.V., BakulinaN.T. and SpektorV.B.2015. Relief‐forming process as one of main factor of soil formation in ice complex of East Siberia. In: Soils of Cold Areas: Genesis, Geography, Ecology (in Russian). Ulan‐Ude, Russia, pp. 102–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wetterich, S., KuzminaS., AndreevA.A., KienastF., MeyerH., SchirrmeisterL., KuznetsovaT. and SierraltaM.2008. Palaeoenvironmental dynamics inferred from late Quaternary permafrost deposits on Kurungnakh Island, Lena Delta, northeast Siberia, Russia.Quaternary Science Reviews27, 1523–1540.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. WashburnA.L.1980. Geocryology: a Survey of Periglacial Processes and Environments.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 406 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WilliamsP.J. and SmithM.W.1989. The Frozen Earth: Fundamentals of Geocryology.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 306 p.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017016
Loading
/content/journals/10.3997/1873-0604.2017016
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error