1887

Abstract

Summary

Identification of sediment types and in particular delineation of leached, possibly sensitive marine clays is of crucial importance for geotechnical design of infrastructure projects. Since leached clays normally have a lower salt content than intact marine clays, the electrical resistivity is consequently higher, and thus clay characterization may be based on data from high-resolution Airborne Electromagnetics (AEM). However, the resistivity difference between leached and unleached clays is small compared to the transition to bedrock and may furthermore vary locally. Therefore, indication of leached clays based on resistivity data has so far been done by manual interpretation. Here, we present a new procedure to calculate the likelihood of possible sensitive clays directly from AEM data. Geotechnical ground investigations are used to locally determine the expected resistivity of sensitive clay. The computation results are compared with well-known quick clay zones. The procedure is not intended as a simple solution to delineate quick clay, but to evaluate an area’s likelihood of sensitive clays that can be used as a cost-saving tool to efficiently place geotechnical investigations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702007
2017-09-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AnschützH, BazinS, PfaffhuberA
    [2015]. Towards Using AEM for Sensitive Clay Mapping-A Case Study from Norway. Extended Abstracts, First European Airborne Electromagnetics Conference, Torino, Italy.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AnschützH, VögeM, LysdahlAK, BazinS, SauvinG, PfaffhuberAA, BerggrenA-L
    [2016]. From manual to automatic AEM bedrock mapping. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics accepted.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DonohueS, LongM, O’ConnorP, HelleTE, PfaffhuberA and RømoenM
    [2012]. Multi-method geophysical mapping of quick clay. Near Surface Geophysics, 4, 113–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. PerssonL, BastaniM, LöfrothH, SmithCA
    [2016]. Airborne TEM measurements used as reconnaissance tool for mapping areas with quick clay in Sweden. 22nd European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. RømoenM, PfaffhuberAA, KarlsrudK, HelleTE
    [2010]. Resistivity on marine sediments retrieved from R-CPTU soundings: A Norwegian case study. 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT ’10), 289–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SauvinG, LecomteI, BazinS, L’HeureuxJS, VannesteM, SolbergIL and DalseggE
    [2013]. Towards geophysical and geotechnical integration for quick-clay mapping in Norway. Near Surface Geophysics, 11.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SolbergIL, HansenL, RønningJS, HaugenED, DalseggE, TønnesenJF
    [2012] Combined geophysical and geotechnical approach to ground investigations and hazard zonation of a quick clay area, mid Norway. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment71 (1), 119–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SørensenKI, AukenE
    [2004] SkyTEM — A new high-resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system. Exploration Geophysics, 35, 191–199.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702007
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702007
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error