1887

Abstract

Summary

The low frequencies used in seismic surveys mean that seafloor characterization is limited horizontally and vertically. It is possible to use multiple reflections from the seabed to hydrophones on Seismic Support Vessels to measure scattering strengths and geoacoustic properties of seabed areas far from the seismic survey. This can be done by combining lower frequencies (directed toward the seabed and with repeatable beam patterns because of sensor design), providing potential sub-surface penetration and higher frequencies (emitted in all directions, with high inter-pulse variability), directly related to surface properties (slopes, roughness, seabed type). This is demonstrated with results from a shallow-water survey, in which the useful frequency range extends from 100 Hz to 20 kHz. Seismic pulses are used as sources of opportunity, and multiple scattering contributions are corrected for variations in propagation ranges and sizes of scattering patches (related to pulse durations). Twelfth-octave frequency bands give highly accurate information of seabed properties, which can be compared to models or previous measurements. The energy distribution of all measurements can be divided into three equally contributing frequency bands, and their RGB representation enables rapid assessment of seabed properties, identifying geomorphological changes and small-scale topography variations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702015
2017-09-03
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Banda, N. and Blondel, Ph.
    [2016] Identifying mid-water targets using the higher frequencies emitted by seismic sources of opportunity. IEEE Oceans’16, Conference Proceedings.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blondel, Ph. and Pace, N.G.
    [2009] Bistatic sonars: sea trials, laboratory experiments and future surveys. Archives of Acoustics, 34(1), 3–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Guan, S., Vignola, J., Judge, J. and Turo, D.
    [2015] Airgun inter-pulse noise field during a seismic survey in an Arctic ultra shallow marine environment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 138(6), 3447–3457.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Heath, B. and Wyatt, R.
    [2014] Sound Source Verification to assess marine mammal impact. Sea Technology55(12), 47–50
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hovem, J.M., Tronstad, T. V., Karlsen, H. E. and Lokkeborg, S.
    [2012] Modeling Propagation of Seismic Airgun Sounds and the Effects on Fish behavior. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 37(4), 576–588.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackson, D.R. and Richardson, M.
    [2007] High-Frequency Seafloor Acoustics, Springer, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lurton, X.
    [2010] Introduction to underwater acoustics: principles and applications. Springer, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. McCauley, R., Duncan, A., Penrose, J. and McCabe, K.
    (2003) Marine seismic surveys: Analysis and propagation of air-gun signals. Centre for Marine Science & Technology (COE).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tashmukhambetov, A. M., Ioup, G. E., Ioup, J. W., Sidorovskaia, N. A., and Newcomb, J. J.
    (2008) Three-dimensional seismic array characterization study: experiment and modeling. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 123(6), 4094–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Telford, W.A., Geldart, L.P. and Sheriff, RE
    (1990) Applied Geophysics, 2nd ed.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702015
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702015
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error