1887

Abstract

Summary

Understanding water and contaminant transport in the unsaturated zone is highly challenging due to spatial variability. Sufficient characterization of spatial and temporal distribution of contaminant transport requires measurements of solute fluxes at multiple locations with high temporal resolution. Solute monitoring is often limited to observations of resident concentrations, while flux concentrations govern the movement of solutes in soils. We developed a new instrument, which combines multi-compartment sampling with electrical resistivity techniques, to monitor solute fluxes.

The multi-compartment electrical resistivity sampler (MCERS) is capable of measuring downward solute fluxes at a high spatio-temporal resolution under natural conditions. The instrument consists of 100 cells (each 31.5 by 31.5 mm). For each cell, the amount of drops passing through every 5 min is recorded, monitoring directly water fluxes. Electrodes are mounted at each corner of each cell, making it possible to perform small-scale ERT measurements above each cell while water percolates through, thereby monitoring solute fluxes. By using different electrode couples, the setup can also be used to image above the MCERS. The percolate is collected from each cell and can be repeatedly extracted for additional chemical analysis while leaving the instrument buried in situ, facilitating prolonged operation times.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702081
2017-09-03
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Atekwana, E., Werkema, D. D., and Atekwana, E. A.
    [2006] Biogeophysics: The effect of microbial processes on geophysical properties of the shallow subsurface, In. Ed. VeereckenH., BinleyA., CassianiG., RevilA., TitovK. [2006] Applied Hydrogeophysics Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, 71, 161–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Binley, A., Kemna, A.
    [2005] DC Resistivity and Induced Polarization Methods. In: RubinB., HubbardS.S. (Editors), Hydrogeophysics. Springer, 129–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloem, E., Hogervorst, F.A.N., de Rooij, G.H., Stagnitti, F.
    [2010] Variable-suction multicompartment samplers to measure spatiotemporal unsaturated water and solute fluxes. Vadose Zone J., 9, 148–159, doi:10.2136/vzj2008.0111.
    https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2008.0111 [Google Scholar]
  4. Hubbard, S.S. and Rubin, Y.
    [2000] Hydrogeological parameter estimation using geophysical data: a review of selected techniques. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45, 3–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. VeereckenH., A.Binley G.Cassiani A.Revil, and K.Titov
    [2006] Applied Hydrogeophysics Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, 71, Springer, 383.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702081
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702081
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error