A Novel Micro-Fracture Tool Design For Directional Hydraulic Fracturing Pilot Test

References

1. Mark A.Proett, et al
   , 1994. Low Permeability Interpretation Using a New Wireline Formation Tester “Tight Zone” Pressure Transient Analysis. SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium.
   [Google Scholar]
2. CarnegieA, et al
   , 2002. An Advanced Method of Determining Insitu Reservoir Stress: Wireline Conveyed Micro-Fracturing. SPE-78486
   [Google Scholar]
3. Danang R.Widijiajia, et al
   , 2010. A Novel Fracture Characterization Approach: Mini-DST Using Wireline Formation Tester. SPE136917
   [Google Scholar]
4. S.EIMsallati, et al
   , 2011. Innovative In-Situ Reservoir Stress Test Helped to Manage and Optimize Water Disposal under Fracturing Conditions in South Oman. SPE144481
   [Google Scholar]
5. R.CBachman, et al
   , 2012. Reappraisal of the G Time Concept in Mini-Frac Analysis. SPE 160169
   [Google Scholar]
6. AukeBarnhoorn, et al
   , 2013. A Novel Approach for Predicting In-situ Breakdown conditions for Wireline Mini-Fracture Testing. SPE 165186
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barnhoorn, A, et al
   , 2010. Stress-and fluid-driven failure during fracture array growth: implication for coupled deformation and flow in the crust. Geology38, 779–782
   [Google Scholar]
8. DescrochesJ., et al
   , 2005. Combination of Micro-hydraulic Fracturing and Wellbore Image Provides Measurement of the Full Stress Tensor: A case Study, SPWLA 46, Louisiana, United States.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ZachariaJ.
   , 2007. “MDT Mini-Frac Guideline for APG”, Grad 11 project, REW Karratha, Australia, Schlumberger.
   [Google Scholar]
10. H.Z.Meng and K.E.Brown
    , 1987. Coupling of production Forecasting, Fracture Geometry Requirements and Treatment Scheduling in the Optimum Hydraulic Fracture Design. SPE16435
    [Google Scholar]
11. ThomasWick, GurpreetSingh, and Mary F.Wheeler
    , 2014. Fluid-Filled Fracture Propagation With a Phase-Field Approach and Coupling to a Reservoir Simulator. SPE 168597
    [Google Scholar]
12. Weijiers, L.
    1995. The Near Wellbore Geometry of Hydraulic Fractures Initiated From Horizontal and Deviated Wellbores, Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technique.
    [Google Scholar]
13. J.Cai, et al
    , 2014. New Advances of Formation Testing in Extreme Tight Gas Reservoirs using new 3D Radial Probe: Case Study in South China Sea. OTC-25032-MS
    [Google Scholar]
14. VanessaMitchell, et al
    , 2010. Inversion of Time-Lapse Electrical Resistivity Imaging Data for Monitoring Infiltration, SEG Denver 2010 Annual Meeting SEG Conference Paper 2010–1950
    [Google Scholar]
15. R.L.Nutt, et al
    , 1989. Time-Lapse Saturation Monitoring and its Applications to Time-Lapse Mapping, SPE Middle East Oil Techniqueal Conference and Exhibition. SPE 17975-MS
    [Google Scholar]
16. S.L.Morriss, et al
    , 1996. Time Lapse Resistivity and Water-Content Changes in Shale, SPE Annual Techniqueal Conference and Exhibition. SPE 36507-MS
    [Google Scholar]
17. RamakrishnanH, et al
    , 2008. Application of Downhole Injection Stress Testing in the Barnett Shale Formation. SPE 116272.
    [Google Scholar]
18. AnishGupta, et al
    , 2013. In-Situ Stress Test Data - Revelation to Optimization of Stimulation Strategy of an Unconventional Reservoir. SPE 165894
    [Google Scholar]