1887

Abstract

Summary

Sediment particle size and its distribution are fundamental attributes of sedimentary deposits that provide key information for reservoir quality evaluation. Traditional grain-size analysis can only be obtained from laboratory testing on rock samples from cores. In the absence of core or suitable cutting information, borehole images and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs are basic input data to estimate grain size. Recently several approaches were proposed for grain-size analysis from NMR for depositional environment studies and expandable sand screen design. In this paper, we propose a new approach for the continuous microfacies analysis from pseudo grain-size distribution of borehole resistivity images.

The true size of particles is very difficult to be measured directly from borehole resistivity image, especially when the particle size is less than the tool button size; additionally, correction factors are different for conductive and resistive particles depending on the resistivity contrast. Based on the high resolution resistivity image, we assume that the resistivity of multiple button measurements represents the particle size relatively, similar to the principle of analyzing textural changes within clastic environments using electrical borehole images. The cumulative probability of each resistivity curve represents a similar statistic to that of grain size in laboratory experiments and indicates the different hydrodynamic conditions. In certain geological settings, the continuous microfacies analysis can be achieved from the cumulative frequency curve shape.

One case study were performed to verify this new approach in Fan delta depositional environments. The analysis results are consistent with drilling core data and provide the detailed microfacies information for sand unit correlation analysis in multiple wells. We find this method is robust in the fluvial system and conglomerate-related depositional environments, and but it is very challenging to distinguish the mouth bar and channel fill in a river-dominated delta ( ).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702389
2017-10-09
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bagnold, R.A.
    , 1956. The flow of cohesionless grains in fluids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, v. 249, p. 235–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, J., Jacobi, D., Kwak, H., Gladkikh, M., and Chen, S.
    , 2007, “Determination of grain size distribution from NMR relaxation time using pore scale modeling”, paper presented at the 20th International Symposium of the SCA, September 2007
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Conroy, T., Mahabeer, Y., Seth, K. et al.
    2010. Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance data for Grain Size Estimation and Expandable Sand Screen Design. Presented at the SPWLA 51st Annual Logging Symposium, Perth, Australia, 19–23 June. SPWLA-2010-77146.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Delhomme, J.P.
    1992. A Quantitative Characterization of Formation Heterogeneities Based on Borehole Image Analysis. Presented at the SPWLA 33rd Annual Logging Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 14–17 June. SPWLA-1992-T.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaafar, R., Altunbay, M., Bal, A. et al.
    2014. Ascendancy of Continuous Profiles of Grain-Size Distribution for Depositional Environment Studies. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10–12 December. IPTC-17754-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Inman, D. L.
    , 1949, Sorting of sediment in light of fluvial mechanics: Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, v. 19, p.51–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. John, W.S. and Rowland, T.L.
    1974. Guidebook to the Depositional Environments of Selected Pennsylvanian Sandstones and Carbonates of Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Special Publication 74-1. ISSN 0275-0929.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Loizou, N., Andrews, I.J., Stoker, S.J. et al.
    2006. West of Shetland Revisited: The Search for Stratigraphic Traps. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 254: 225–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Patrick, H.C.
    1963. Petroleum Geology of Pawnee County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey, Circular 62.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Newberry, B. M., Hansen, S. M., and Perrett, T. T.
    2004. A Method for Analyzing Textural Changes within Clastic Environments Utilizing Electrical Borehole Images. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions54: 531–539.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Visher, S.
    1969. Grain Size Distributions and Depositional Processes.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology39 (3): 1074–1106.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang, S., Aviantara, A., Delius, H., Le Nir, I., Gong, H., Wang, K.
    , Continuous micro-facies analysis in clastic environments utilizing pseudo grain size distribution from electrical borehole images: SPE 181477, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition2016, Dubai, UAE.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, S., Laronga, R., Le Nir, I. et al.
    2014a. Sedimentology from Wellbore to 3-D Reservoir with High-Definition Borehole Images in both Water-Based and Oil-Based Muds. Presented at the EAGE Borehole Geology Workshop, Dubai, 12–15 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, S., Marza, P., Le Nir, I. et al.
    2014b. Semi-Automatic Sedimentary Analysis From New High Resolution Oil-based Mud Borehole Resistivity Image. Presented at the AAPG International Conference & Exhibition, Istanbul, Turkey, 14–17 September.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702389
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702389
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error