1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 9th Congress of the Balkan Geophysical Society
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

In theory it is not possible to separate features below resolution limit in this case the amplitude contains the information only. But what happens if we know the signal shape? The presentation will discuss the limits and possibilities to go below resolution at early times by removing unwanted wave types from GPR records. The theory was tested on medieval frescoes. The tests proved that in certain cases we can go below theoretical resolution limit at early time GPR signals. The method described in the presentation is not general, it has a lot of limitations, but until higher frequency antennas are introduced into the market, somehow we have to retrieve necessary near surface information from the GPR records. The method is one step to that direction.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702547
2017-11-05
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702547
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Annan, P.
    [2003] Ground Penetrating Radar Principles, Procedures & Applications. Sensors & Software Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. CupaA., FelczakM., KurkiewiczT., LamentA., RogalR., RogózJ., SzroederP. and WięcekB.
    [2012] Thermovision and ground penetrating radar for investigation of architectural decorations – potential and limitations. 11th International Conference on Quantitative InfraRed Thermography, Extended Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Di Matteo, A., ElenaP., and S.Evert
    . [2013] Early-time GPR signal attributes to estimate soil dielectric permittivity: A theoretical study. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 51,:1643–1654.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. FerraraC., Di TullioV., BaroneP.M., MatteiE., LauroS.E., ProiettiN., CapitaniD. and PettinelliE.
    [2013] Comparison of GPR and unilateral NMR for water content measurements in a laboratory scale experiment. Near Surface Geophysics, 11(2) 143–153.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. HamroucheR., KlyszG., BalayssacJ-P., LaurensS., RhaziJ., BallivyG. and ArliguieG.
    [2009] Numerical modeling of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for the investigation of jointing defects in brick masonry structures. Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering, Extended Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. PieracciniM., LuziG., MecattiD., FratiniM., PinelliG. and AtzeniC.
    [2004] No-Contact Penetrating Radar for Cultural Heritage Applications: a Case Study in Palazzo Vecchio (Firenze). Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symposium, Extended Abstracts.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. RialF., LorenzoH., PereiraM. and ArmestoJ.
    [2009] Waveform Analysis of UWB GPR Antennas. Sensors, 9, 1454–1470.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702547
Loading
What Is Below Resolution? Gpr Early Time Processing
Conference Proceedings 2017, 1 (2017); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201702547
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702547
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702547
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error