1887

Abstract

Summary

Determining and imaging the buried structures in underground is a widespread topic and the location and shape of buried structures can be determined detail with growing engineering technologies. Connection and analysis of the structure of the data is presented and obtained clearly by the edge detection filters. Upward continuation methods are applied to gravity anomalies for levels of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1 km. Total Horizontal Derivative (THD), Analytical Signal (AS), Tilt Angle Derivative (Tilt), Total Horizontal Derivative (THDR), Teta Angle Derivative (cosθ) and Hyperbolic Tilt Angle Derivative (HTA) are performed to upward continued gravity anomalies of study area respectively and the discontinuities and the boundaries of the geological structure are determined in the basin area. Tilt and Teta angle derivatives are given the best results from the applied derivative filters. The obtained results are compared with the existing surface geology. In addition to the discontinuities determined from surface observations, new structures and discontinuities are found from obtained results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702622
2017-11-05
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akpınar, Z., Gursoy, H., Tatar, O., Buyuksarac, A., Kocbulut, F., Piper, J.DA.
    [2016] Geophysical analysis of fault geometry and volcanic activity in the Erzincan Basin, Central Turkey: Complex evolution of a mature pull-apart basin. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 116, 97–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akpınar, Z.
    [2010] Erzincan Havzası’nın tektonik gelişiminin paleomanyetik ve potansiyel alan verileri ile incelenmesi. Doktora tezi, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 196 s. Sivas.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cordell, L.E. and Grauch, V.J.S.
    [1985] Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan basin, New Mexico. In: W.J.Hinze, Editor, The Utility of Regional Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly Maps, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 181–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper, G.R.J. and Cowan, D.R.
    [2006] Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase. Computers … Geosciences. 32(10), 1585–1591.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Miller, H.G. and Singh, V.
    [1994] Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential filed sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 32, 213–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nabighian, M.N.
    [1972] The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and used for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics. 37, 507–517
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Roest, W.R., Verhoef, J. and Pilkington, M.
    [1992] Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics. 57(1), 116–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Verduzco, B., Fairhead, J.D., Green, C.M. and MacKenzie, C.
    [2004] New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping. The Leading Edge. 23(2), 116–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wijns, C., Perez, C. and Kowalczyk, P.
    [2005] Theta map: edge detection in magnetic data. Geophysics. 70(4), L39–L43.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702622
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702622
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error