How does water near clay mineral surfaces influence the rock physics of shales?

References

1. AnandarajahA. and AmarasingheP.M.2013. Discrete‐element study of the swelling behavior of Na‐montmorillonite. Géotechnique63, 674–681.
   [Google Scholar]
2. AntognozziM., HumphrisA.D.L. and MilesM.J.2001. Observation of molecular layering in a confined water film and study of the layers viscoelastic properties. Applied Physics Letters78, 300–302.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BakkA., FjærE. and HoltR.M.2006. Simple model for lithological anisotropy of shale. 68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, p. 4.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BathijaA.P., LiangH., LuN., PrasadM. and BatzleM.L.2009. Stressed swelling clay. Geophysics74, A47–A52.
   [Google Scholar]
5. BoekE.S., CoveneyP.V. and SkipperN.T.1995. Monte Carlo molecular modeling studies of hydrated Li‐, Na‐, and K‐smectites: understanding the role of potassium as a clay swelling inhibitor. Journal of the American Chemical Society117, 12608–12617.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chávez‐PáezM., VanWorkumK., dePabloL. and dePabloJ.J.2001. Monte Carlo simulations of Wyoming sodium montmorillonite hydrates. The Journal of Chemical Physics114, 1405–1413.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DerjaguinB. and LandauL.1941. Theory of the stability of strongly charged lyophobic sols and of the adhesion of strongly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes. Acta Physico‐Chimica Sinica. URSS14, 633.
   [Google Scholar]
8. GoertzM.P., HoustonJ.E. and ZhuX.‐Y.2007. Hydrophilicity and the viscosity of interfacial water. Langmuir23, 5491–5497.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HamptonL.D.1967. Acoustic properties of sediments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America42, 882–889.
   [Google Scholar]
10. HoltR.M. and FjærE.2003. Wave velocities in shale—A rock physics model. 65th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Stavanger, Norway, p. 4.
    [Google Scholar]
11. IsraelachviliJ.N. and WennerströmH.1996. Role of hydration and water structure in biological and colloidal interaction. Nature379, 219–225.
    [Google Scholar]
12. JorgensenW.L.1981. Transferable intermolecular potential functions for water, alcohols, and ethers. Application to liquid water. Journal of the American Chemical Society103, 335–340.
    [Google Scholar]
13. KaraborniS., SmitB., HeidugW., UraiJ. and vanOortE.1996. The swelling of clays: molecular simulations of the hydration of montmotillonite. Science271, 1102–1104.
    [Google Scholar]
14. KattiD.R., MatarM.I., KattiK.S. and AmarasingheP.M.2009. Multiscale modeling of swelling clays: a computational and experimental approach. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering13, 243–255.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KolstøM.I. and HoltR.M.2012. Water in clay and shale: molecular scale and rock physics modelling vs. experiments. 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Copenhagen, Denmark, p. 4.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Leote de CarvalhoR.J.F. and SkipperN.T.2001. Atomistic computer simulation of the clay–fluid interface in colloidal laponite. The Journal of Chemical Physics114, 3727–3733.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MarryV., RotenbergB. and TurqP.2008. Structure and dynamics of water at a clay surface from molecular dynamics simulation. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics10, 4802–4813.
    [Google Scholar]
18. OdelieusM., BernasconiM. and ParrinelloM.1997. Two dimensional ice adsorbed on mica surface. Physical Review Letters78, 2855–2858.
    [Google Scholar]
19. ParkS.‐H. and SpositoG.2002. Structure of water adsorbed on a mica surface. Physical Review Letters89, 085501‐1‐3.
    [Google Scholar]
20. PotyondyD.O.2010. Molecular Dynamics with PFC (Technical Memorandum ICG6522‐L, January 6, 2010). Minneapolis, MN: Itasca Consulting Group.
    [Google Scholar]
21. PotyondyD.O.2014. The bonded‐particle model as a tool for rock mechanics research and application: current trends and future directions. Geosystems Engineering17, 342–369.
    [Google Scholar]
22. RavivU. and KleinJ.2002. Fluidity of bound hydration layers. Science297, 1540–1543.
    [Google Scholar]
23. SkipperN.T., RefsonK. and McConnellJ.D.C.1991. Computer simulation of interlayer water in 2:1 clays. The Journal of Chemical Physics94, 7434–7445.
    [Google Scholar]
24. SpositoG., ParkS.‐H. and SuttonR.1999. Monte Carlo simulation of the total radial distribution function for interlayer water in Sodium and Potassium montmorillonites. Clay and Clay Minerals47, 192–200.
    [Google Scholar]
25. SridharanA. and JayadevaM.S.1982. Double layer theory and compressibility of clays. Géotechnique32, 133–144.
    [Google Scholar]
26. SridharanA. and PrakashK.1999. Mechanisms controlling the undrained shear strength behaviour of clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal36, 1030–1038.
    [Google Scholar]
27. SuterJ.L., CoveneyP.V., GreenwellH.C. and ThyveetilM.‐A.2007. Large‐scale molecular dynamics study of montmorillonite clay: emergence of undulatory fluctuations and determination of material properties. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C111, 8248–8259.
    [Google Scholar]
28. UlcinasA., ValdreG., SnitkaV., MilesM.J., ClaessonP.M. and AntognozziM.2011. Shear response of nanoconfined water on muscovite mica: role of cations. Langmuir27, 10351–10355.
    [Google Scholar]
29. VerweyE.J.K and OverbeekJ.T.G.1948. Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids. Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
30. WangJ., KalinichevA.G. and KirkpatrickR.J.2006. Effects of substrate structure and composition on the structure, dynamics, and energetics of water at mineral surfaces: a molecular dynamics modeling study. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta70, 562–582.
    [Google Scholar]
31. WarneM.R., AllanN.L. and CosgroveT.2000. Computer simulation of water molecules at kaolinite and silica surfaces. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics2, 3663–3668.
    [Google Scholar]