1887
PDF

Abstract

Summary

Seismic surey process is the most common technology for prospecting and exploration of oil and gas deposits around the world. It allows to reconstruct the structure of the subsurface are on the basis of day surface movements caused by vibrational or explosive sources, due to the reflection of volumetric seismic waves from geological heterogeneities. Two different problems of seismic survey can be distinguished: inversion and migration. Development of new approaches to the solution of the latest one is the goal of this research.

This article is devoted to the problem of seismic imaging of layered fractured geological media. Authors proposed a new approach to the subsurface area image creation based on the numerical solution of the linear elasticity system. Adjoint operator approach was used, direct and adjoint problems were solved numerically by the grid-characteristic method on hexahedral meshes. Developed method allows to use arbitrary background models, even fractured. It was successfully applied to the model of the multi-layered fractured geolgical medium.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702196
2017-09-11
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2017/43756.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702196&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Claerbout, J.F.
    [1970] Coarse grid calculations of waves in inhomogeneous media with application to delineation of complicated seismic structure. Geophysics, 36(3), 407–418.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Claerbout, J.F., Doherty, S.M.
    [1972] Downward continuation of moveout-corrected seismograms. Geophysics, 37(5), 741–768.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. French, W. S.
    [1975] Computer migration of oblique seismic reflection profiles. Geophysics, 40, 961–980.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clayton, Robert W. and Stolt, Robert H.
    [1981] A Born-WKBJ inversion method for acoustic reflection data. Geophysics, 46(11), 1559–1567.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baysal, E., D.Kosloff, and J.Sherwood
    [1983] Reverse time migration. Geophysics, 48, 1514–1524.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Etgen, J., Gray, S., and Zhang, Y.
    [2009] An overview of depth imaging in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74, WCA5–WCA17.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiao, K.
    et al. [2012] Elastic migration for improving salt and subsalt imaging and inversion. SEG Las Vegas Annual Meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Voinov, O.Ya., Golubev, V.I., Petrov, I.B.
    [2016] Elastic imaging using multiprocessor computer systems. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1787, 491–495.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Golubev, V.I., Petrov, I.B., Khokhlov, N.I., Shul’ts, K.I.
    [2015] Numerical computation of wave propagation in fractured media by applying the grid-characteristic method on hexahedral meshes. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 55(3), 509–518.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Golubev, V.I., Petrov, I.B., Khokhlov, N.I.
    [2015] Simulation of seismic processes inside the planet using the hybrid grid-characteristic method. Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations, 7(5), 439–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Левянт, В.Б., Миряха, В.А., Муратов, М.В., Петров, И.Б.
    [2015] Оценка влияния на сейсмический отклик степени раскрытости трещины и доли площади локальных контактов к ее поверхности. Технологии Сейсморазведки, 3, 16–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Luo Y., Tromp J., DenelB., CalandraH.
    [2013] 3D coupled acoustic-elastic migration with topography and bathymetry based on spectral-element and adjoint methods. Geophysics, 78(4), S193–S202.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Голубев, В.И., Петров, И.Б.
    [2016] Опыт расчёта сейсмических откликов от криволинейных геологических границ на основе их явного выделения. Технологии Сейсморазведки, 4, 45–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Claerbout, J.F.
    [1970] Coarse grid calculations of waves in inhomogeneous media with application to delineation of complicated seismic structure. Geophysics, 36(3), 407–418.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Claerbout, J.F., Doherty, S.M.
    [1972] Downward continuation of moveout-corrected seismograms. Geophysics, 37(5), 741–768.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. French, W. S.
    [1975] Computer migration of oblique seismic reflection profiles. Geophysics, 40, 961–980.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Clayton, Robert W. and Stolt, Robert H.
    [1981] A Born-WKBJ inversion method for acoustic reflection data. Geophysics, 46(11), 1559–1567.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Baysal, E., D.Kosloff, and J.Sherwood
    [1983] Reverse time migration. Geophysics, 48, 1514–1524.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Etgen, J., Gray, S., and Zhang, Y.
    [2009] An overview of depth imaging in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74, WCA5–WCA17.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiao, K.
    et al. [2012] Elastic migration for improving salt and subsalt imaging and inversion. SEG Las Vegas Annual Meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Voinov, O.Ya., Golubev, V.I., Petrov, I.B.
    [2016] Elastic imaging using multiprocessor computer systems. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1787, 491–495.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Golubev, V.I., Petrov, I.B., Khokhlov, N.I., Shul’ts, K.I.
    [2015] Numerical computation of wave propagation in fractured media by applying the grid-characteristic method on hexahedral meshes. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 55(3), 509–518.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Golubev, V.I., Petrov, I.B., Khokhlov, N.I.
    [2015] Simulation of seismic processes inside the planet using the hybrid grid-characteristic method. Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations, 7(5), 439–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Leviant, V.B., Miryakha, V.A., Muratov, M.V., Petrov, I.B.
    [2015] Seismic responses of vertical fractures depending on their thickness. Seismic Technologies, 3, 16–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Luo Y., Tromp J., DenelB., CalandraH.
    [2013] 3D coupled acoustic-elastic migration with topography and bathymetry based on spectral-element and adjoint methods. Geophysics, 78(4), S193–S202.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Golubev, V.I., Petrov, I.B.
    [2016] Experience of seismic responses from curvilinear geological boundaries modeling based on their explicit position description. Seismic Technologies, 4, 45–50.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702196
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702196
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error