oa Features of Magnetotelluric Transfer Functions for the Central Part of East European Platform

References

1. БердичевскийМ.Н.
   Основы теории магнитотеллурического профилирования// Прикладная геофизика. 1960. № 28. C. 70–91.
   [Google Scholar]
2. БердичевскийМ.Н., ВаньянЛ.Л., ФайнбергЭ.Б.
   Теоретические принципы использования электромагнитных вариаций для изучения электропроводности Земли// Геомагнетизм и аэрономия. 1969. Т. 9, № 3, С. 570–572.
   [Google Scholar]
3. МорозЮ.Ф. СмирновС.Э., МорозТ.А.
   Результаты мониторинга вариаций геомагнитного поля на Камчатке// Физика Земли. 2006. № 3. С. 49–56.
   [Google Scholar]
4. МорозЮ.Ф., МорозТ.А., СмирновС.Э.
   Результаты мониторинга вариаций геомагнитного поля на обсерваториях «Магадан» и «Паратунка»// Физика Земли. 2011. № 8. С. 49–61.
   [Google Scholar]
5. РокитянскийИ.И., БабакВ.И., ТерешинА.В.
   К исследованию глубины залегания Карпатской аномалии электропроводности // Геофиз. журн. 2014. Т. 36, № 3. С. 146–159.
   [Google Scholar]
6. ТихоновА.Н., БердичевскийМ.Н.
   Опыт применения магнитотеллурических методов при изучении геологического строения осадочных бассейнов// Физика Земли. 1966. № 2, C. 34–41.
   [Google Scholar]
7. ХаринЕ.П.
   Изменчивость передаточных функций электромагнитного поля Земли во времени// Геофиз. журнал. 1981. Т.3. № 3. С.16–23.
   [Google Scholar]
8. ChantI.J, HastieL.M.
   Time-frequency analysis of magnetotelluric data // Geophys. J. Int.1992. V. 111. No. 2. P. 399–413.
   [Google Scholar]
9. ChaveD. J., ThomsonA. D.
   Bounded influence magnetotelluric response function estimation// Geophys. J. Int.2004. V. 157. No. 3. P. 988–1006.
   [Google Scholar]
10. GambleT.D., GoubauW.M., ClarkJ.
    Magnetotellurics with a remote reference// Geophys.1979. V. 44. P.53–68.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GoubauW.M., GambleT.D., ClarkJ.
    Magnetotelluric data analysis: removal of bias// Geophys.1978. V. 43. P.1157–1166.
    [Google Scholar]
12. LarsenI.C., MackieR.L., ManzellaA.
    Robust smooth magnetotelluric transfer functions// Geophys. J. Int.1996. V. 124. P. 801–819.
    [Google Scholar]
13. ShirakiM.
    Monitoring of the time change in transfer functions in the Central Japan conductivity anomaly // J. Geomag. Geoelectr.1980. V. 32. P. 637–648.
    [Google Scholar]
14. SmirnovM.Yu.
    Magnetotelluric data processing with a robust statistical procedure having a high breakdown point// Geophys. J. Int.2003. V. 152. P. 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
15. VozoffK.
    1972. The magnetotelluric methods in the exploration of sedimentary basins// Geophysics, 37, 98–141.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Berdichevsky M.N. Principles of Magnetotelluric profiling theory //Journal of Applied Geophysics. 1960. V. 28. P. 70–91.
    [Google Scholar]
17. BerdichevskyM.N., VanyanL.L., FainbergE.B.
    , On theoretical principles of using electromagnetic variations for the Earth’s conductivity study// Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. 1969. V. 9. P. 570–572.
    [Google Scholar]
18. ChantI.J, HastieL.M.
    Time-frequency analysis of magnetotelluric data // Geophys. J. Int.1992. V. 111. No. 2. P. 399–413.
    [Google Scholar]
19. ChaveD. J., ThomsonA. D.
    Bounded influence magnetotelluric response function estimation// Geophys. J. Int.2004. V. 157. No. 3. P. 988–1006.
    [Google Scholar]
20. GambleT.D., GoubauW.M., ClarkJ.
    Magnetotellurics with a remote reference// Geophys.1979. V. 44. P.53–68.
    [Google Scholar]
21. GoubauW.M., GambleT.D., ClarkJ.
    Magnetotelluric data analysis: removal of bias// Geophys.1978. V. 43. P.1157–1166.
    [Google Scholar]
22. KharinE.P.
    Changes in transfer functions with time// Geophys surveys. 1982. V. 4. No. 4. P. 455–466.
    [Google Scholar]
23. LarsenI.C., MackieR.L., ManzellaA.
    Robust smooth magnetotelluric transfer functions// Geophys. J. Int.1996. V. 124. P. 801–819.
    [Google Scholar]
24. MorozYu.F., SmirnovS.E., MorozT.A.
    Results of the monitoring of geomagnetic field variations in the Kamchatka region// Izv. Phys. Earth. 2006. V. 42. No. 3. P. 225–231.
    [Google Scholar]
25. MorozYu.F., MorozT.A., SmirnovS.E.
    Results of monitoring the geomagnetic variations at the Magadan and Paratunka observatories // Izv. Phys. Earth. 2011. V. 47. No 8. P. 698–710
    [Google Scholar]
26. RokityanskyI.I., BabakV.I., TereshinA.V.
    On the Carpathian electrical conductivity anomaly depth study// Geophysical journal. 2014. V. 36. No. 3. P. 146–159.
    [Google Scholar]
27. ShirakiM.
    Monitoring of the time change in transfer functions in the Central Japan conductivity anomaly // J. Geomag. Geoelectr.1980. V. 32. P. 637–648.
    [Google Scholar]
28. SmirnovM.Yu.
    Magnetotelluric data processing with a robust statistical procedure having a high breakdown point// Geophys. J. Int.2003. V. 152. P. 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
29. TikhonovA.N., BerdichevskyM.N.
    Experience in the use of magnetotelluric methods to study the geological structures of sedimentary basins// Izv. Phys. Earth. 1966. V. 2. P. 34–41.
    [Google Scholar]
30. VozoffK.
    1972. The magnetotelluric methods in the exploration of sedimentary basins// Geophysics, 37, 98–141.
    [Google Scholar]