1887
Volume 66 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

To investigate the characteristics of the anisotropic stratum, a multi‐azimuth seismic refraction technique is proposed in this study since the travel time anomaly of the refraction wave induced by this anisotropic stratum will be large for a far offset receiver. To simplify the problem, a two‐layer (isotropy–horizontal transverse isotropy) model is considered. A new travel time equation of the refracted P‐wave propagation in this two‐layer model is derived, which is the function of the phase and group velocities of the horizontal transverse isotropic stratum. In addition, the measured refraction wave velocity in the physical model experiment is the group velocity. The isotropic intercept time equation of a refraction wave can be directly used to estimate the thickness of the top (isotropic) layer of the two‐layer model because the contrast between the phase and group velocities of the horizontal transverse isotropic medium is seldom greater than 10% in the Earth. If the contrast between the phase and group velocities of an anisotropic medium is small, the approximated travel time equation of a refraction wave is obtained. This equation is only dependent on the group velocity of the horizontal transverse isotropic stratum. The elastic constants , , and and the Thomsen anisotropic parameter of the horizontal transverse isotropic stratum can be estimated using this multi‐azimuth seismic refraction technique. Furthermore, under a condition of weak anisotropy, the Thomsen anisotropic parameter of the horizontal transverse isotropic stratum can be estimated by this technique as well.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12526
2017-06-06
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BackusG.E.1962. Long‐wave elastic anisotropic produced by horizontal layering. Journal of Geophysical Research67, 4427–4441.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BakulinA., GrechkaV. and TsvankinI.2000. Estimation of fracture parameters from reflection seismic data—Part I: HTI model due to a single fracture set. Geophysics65, 1788–1802.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CaiP. and TsvankinI.2013. Joint migration velocity analysis of PP‐ and PS‐waves for VTI media. Geophysics78, WC123–WC135.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChangY.F., ChouM.M.C. and ChangC.H.2006. Experimental measurements of the phase and group velocities of body waves in a transversely isotropic medium. NDT&E International39, 162–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CooperJ.K., LawtonD.C. and MargraveG.F.2010. The wedge model revisited: a physical modeling experiment. Geophysics75, T15–T21.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DewanganP., TsvankinI., BatzleM., WijkK. and HaneyM.2006. PS‐wave moveout inversion for tilted TI media: a physical‐modeling study. Geophysics71, D135–D143.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DobrinM.B. and SavitC.H.1988. Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting, 4th edn.New York: McGraw‐Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. HallS.A. and KendallJ.M.2003. Fracture characterization at Valhall: application of P‐wave amplitude variation with offset and azimuth (AVOA) analysis. Geophysics68, 1150–1160.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HelbigK.1964. Refraction seismics with an anisotropic overburden: a graphical method of interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting12, 383–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HelbigK.1984. Anisotropy and dispersion in periodically layered media. Geophysics49, 364–373.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HelbigK.1993. Longitudinal directions in media of arbitrary anisotropy. Geophysics58, 680–691.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KazinnikR., RoyB., TuraA., VedvikL. and KnothO.2014. Near surface velocities at Ekofisk from Scholte and refracted wave analysis. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2036–2039.
  13. Leslie, J.M. and LawtonD.C.1999. A refraction‐seismic field study to determine the anisotropic parameters of shales. Geophysics64, 1247–1252.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. NayfehA.H.1995. Wave Propagation in Layered Anisotropic Media with Applications to Composites. North‐Holland, p. 66.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. OlofssonB., ProbertT., KommedalJ.H. and BarkvedO.I.2003. Azimuthal anisotropy from the Valhall 4C 3D survey. The Leading Edge22, 1228–1235.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. OnishiM. and HarrisJ.M.1991. Anisotropy from head waves in cross‐well data. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 115–118.
  17. TuraA., KazinnikR., TaoY. and BetterlyS.2015. A refraction method to detect reservoir velocity and anisotropy. The Leading Edge34, 548–552.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RugerA.1998. Variation of P‐wave reflectivity with offset and azimuth in anisotropic media. Geophysics63, 935–947.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. RugerA.2002. Reflection coefficients and azimuthal AVO analysis in anisotropic media. Tulsa, Oklahoma: SEG, 190 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SaitoH.1991. Anisotropic traveltime tomography at the Buckhorn test facility in Illinois. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 123–126.
  21. ShearerP.M. and OrcuttJ.A.1986. Compressional and shear wave anisotropy in the oceanic lithosphere—The Ngendei seismic refraction experiment. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society87, 967–1003.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ThomsenL.1986. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954–1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. TsvankinI. and ThomsenL.1994. Nonhyperbolic reflection moveout in anisotropic media. Geophysics59, 1290–1304.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12526
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12526
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy; Horizontal transverse isotropy; Seismic refraction technique

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error