1887
Volume 66 Number 1
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Rock fractures are of great practical importance to petroleum reservoir engineering because they provide pathways for fluid flow, especially in reservoirs with low matrix permeability, where they constitute the primary flow conduits. Understanding the spatial distribution of natural fracture networks is thus key to optimising production. The impact of fracture systems on fluid flow patterns can be predicted using discrete fracture network models, which allow not only the 6 independent components of the second‐rank permeability tensor to be estimated, but also the 21 independent components of the fully anisotropic fourth‐rank elastic stiffness tensor, from which the elastic and seismic properties of the fractured rock medium can be predicted. As they are stochastically generated, discrete fracture network realisations are inherently non‐unique. It is thus important to constrain their construction, so as to reduce their range of variability and, hence, the uncertainty of fractured rock properties derived from them. This paper presents the underlying theory and implementation of a method for constructing a geologically realistic discrete fracture network, constrained by seismic amplitude variation with offset and azimuth data. Several different formulations are described, depending on the type of seismic data and prior geologic information available, and the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach are compared. Potential applications of the method are numerous, including the prediction of fluid flow, elastic and seismic properties of fractured reservoirs, model‐based inversion of seismic amplitude variation with offset and azimuth data, and the optimal placement and orientation of infill wells to maximise production.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12527
2017-05-31
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BachrachR.2015. Uncertainty and non‐uniqueness in linearized AVOAZ for orthorhombic media. The Leading Edge34, 1048–1056.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BachrachR., SayersC.M., DasguptaS., SilvaJ. and VolterraniS.2013. Recent advances in the characterization of unconventional reservoirs with wide‐azimuth seismic data. SPE Paper 168764.
  3. CacasM.C., DanielJ.M. and LetouzeyJ.2001. Nested geological modelling of naturally fractured reservoirs. Petroleum Geoscience7, S43–S52.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CascianoC., RuvoL., VolpiB. and MasseranoF.2004. Well test simulation through discrete fracture network modelling in a fractured carbonate reservoir. Petroleum Geoscience10, 331–342.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ChangC.H. and GardnerG.H.F.1993. Effects of vertically aligned fractures on reflection amplitudes: an amplitude‐versus‐offset study. 63rd SEG Meeting, Washington DC, Expanded Abstracts, 769–771.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. den BoerL.D. and SayersC.M., Schlumberger Technology Corporation , 2014. Determining elastic and fluid flow properties of a fractured reservoir. U.S. Patent8,781,806.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DershowitzB., LaPointeP., EibenT. and WeiL.2000. Integration of discrete feature network methods with conventional simulator approaches. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering3, 165–170. SPE‐62498‐PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FarM.E., ThomsenL. and SayersC.M.2013. Seismic characterization of reservoirs with asymmetric fractures. Geophysics78, N1–N10.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GongB., Karimi‐FardM. and DurlofskyL.J.2006. An upscaling procedure for constructing generalized dual‐porosity/dual‐permeability models from discrete fracture characterizations. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HobdayC. and WorthingtonM.H.2011. Field measurements of normal and shear fracture compliance. Geophysical Prospecting60, 488–499.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. IkelleL.T.1996. Amplitude variations with azimuths (AVOAZ) inversion based on linearized inversion of common azimuth sections. In: Seismic Anisotropy (eds. E.Fjaer , R.Holt and J.S.Rathore ), 601–644. Tulsa: SEG.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. IkelleL.T.1997. Parameterization of AVOAZ (amplitude variation with azimuth) inversion. Journal of Seismic Exploration6, 19–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KachanovM.1980. Continuum model of medium with cracks. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Div. ASCE 106, 1039–1051.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Karimi‐FardM., DurlofskyL.J. and AzizK.2003. An efficient discrete fracture model applicable for general purpose reservoir simulators. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KimK.Y., WrolstadK.H. and AminzadehF.1993. Effects of transverse isotropy on P‐wave AVO for gas sands. Geophysics58, 883–888.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LefeuvreF. and DesegaulxP.1993. Azimuthal anisotropy analysis with P‐waves—The AVO‐AVOAZ approach. 55th EAEG Meeting, Stavanger, Norway, Expanded Abstracts, Paper C031.
  17. LynnH.B., BatesC.R., LaymanM. and JonesM.1994. Natural fracture characterization using P‐wave reflection seismic data, VSP, borehole imaging logs, and the in‐situ stress field determination. SPE Paper 29595.
  18. LynnH.B., SimonK.M., LaymanM., SchneiderR., BatesC.R. and JonesM.1995. Use of anisotropy in P‐wave and S‐wave data for fracture characterization in a naturally fractured gas reservoir. The Leading Edge14, 887–893.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MallickS., ChambersR.E. and GonzalezA.1996. Method for determining the principal axes of azimuthal anisotropy from seismic P‐wave data: US Patent 5 508 973.
  20. MallickS. and FrazerL.N.1991. Reflection/transmission coefficients and azimuthal anisotropy in marine seismic studies. Geophysical Journal International105, 241–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MavkoG., MukerjiT. and DvorkinJ.2009. The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. NicholsD.2012. Resolution in seismic inversion—Spectral gap or spectral overlap, which is harder to handle? 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 4–7, 2012.
  23. NyeJ.F.1985. Physical Properties of Crystals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PlessixR.E. and BorkJ.2000. Quantitative estimate of VTI parameters from AVA responses. Geophysical Prospecting48(1), 87–108.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. PšencíkI. and MartinsJ.L.2001. Properties of weak contrast PP reflection/transmission coefficients for weakly anisotropic elastic media: Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica45, 176–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. RügerA.1997. P‐wave reflection coefficients for transversely isotropic media with vertical and horizontal axis of symmetry. Geophysics62, 713–722.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. RügerA.1998. Variation of P‐wave reflectivity with offset and azimuth in anisotropic media. Geophysics63, 935–947.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SayersC.M.1998. Misalignment of the orientation of fractures and the principal axes for P‐ and S‐waves in rocks containing multiple non‐orthogonal fracture sets. Geophysical Journal International133, 459–466.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SayersC.M.2010. Geophysics under stress: geomechanical applications of seismic and borehole acoustic waves: Distinguished Instructor Series No. 13, SEG, Chapter 7.
  30. SayersC.M. and DeanS.2001. Azimuth‐dependent AVO in reservoirs containing non‐orthogonal fracture sets. Geophysical Prospecting49, 100–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. SayersC.M. and den BoerL.D.2012. Characterizing production‐induced anisotropy of fractured reservoirs having multiple fracture sets. Geophysical Prospecting60, 919–939.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. SayersC.M. and KachanovM.1995. Microcrack‐induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research100, 4149–4156.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SayersC.M. and RickettJ.E.1997. Azimuthal variation in AVO response for fractured gas sands. Geophysical Prospecting45, 165–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. SchoenbergM. and SayersC.M.1995. Seismic anisotropy of fractured rock. Geophysics60, 204–211.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. ThomsenL.1988. Reflection seismology over azimuthally anisotropic media. Geophysics53, 304–313.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. VavrycukV. and PšencíkI.1998. PP‐wave reflection in weakly anisotropic elastic media. Geophysics63, 2129–2141.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. WorthingtonM.2007. The compliance of macrofractures. The Leading Edge26(9), 1118–1122.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12527
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12527
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Anisotropy; Inversion; Reservoir geophysics; Rock physics; Seismics

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error