1887

Abstract

Summary

A priori assessment of the expected location accuracy of a sensor network is typically done through inversion of the travel-time spatial gradients. This approach assumes that the applied location algorithm successfully recovers the global minimum of the objective function. However even for phase-picks without errors, complexity in the velocity model and limitations in network layout may inhibit the finding of a global minimum. The location algorithms may end up in a local minimum instead. This study focuses solely on the algorithmic aspects of the event location procedure. For a series of synthetic microseismic event locations, we calculate arrival times, add picking errors, and then feed these synthetic picks into a set of different location routines which look for minima in selected misfit objective functions. While most of the analyzed location approaches mainly lead to good location results, none of the analyzed approaches recovered the correct location for all event locations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800068
2018-03-26
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blias, E. and V.Grechka
    , 2013, Analytic solutions to the joint estimation of microseismic event locations and effective velocity model, Geophysics, 78 (3)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kirkpatrick, S., C. D.Gelatt, and M. P.Vecchi
    , 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 220 (4598), 671–680
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lomax, A., J.Virieux, P.Volant, and C.Berge
    , 2000, Probabilistic earthquake location in 3D and layered models: Introduction of a Metropolis-Gibbs method and comparison with linear locations, in: Advances in Seismic Event Location, Thurber, C.H., and N.Rabinowitz (eds.), Kluwer, Amsterdam, 101–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Schweitzer, J.
    ,2001, HYPOSAT — an enhanced routine to locate seismic events, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 158, 277–289
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Storn, R., and K.Price
    , 1997, Differential Evolution — A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4), 341–359
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zimmer, U. and J.Jin
    , 2011, Fast Search Algorithms for Automatic Localization of Microseismic Events, CESG Recorder, 36(9)
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800068
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800068
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error