1887

Abstract

Summary

Among all possible algorithms of spatial filtering Radon transform is mostly used to separate signal from interfering noise that has big amplitude and minor T-X curve difference. The quality of the filtration can be significantly improved by using the algorithms that calculate the contribution of the different components of the direct Radon transform spectrum in the general wave field. This paper proposes the use of seismic signal model with variable amplitude when performing filtering with the use of Radon transform. This model has some advantages for different components of the wave field separation in comparison to the regular wave field local summation and enables a more detailed estimation of the seismic wave model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800311
2018-04-09
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ЕсиновБ.С., ЛитвяковаО.О., КоролевА.Е., СмирновК.А., ШевченкоА.А., ЛандаЕ.
    Разделение мигрированных волновых полей на отраженную и рассеянную компоненты. Тезисы докладов XIX международной научно-практической конференции “Геомодель”, Геленджик, 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  2. НапалковЮ.В. СердобольскийЛ.А.
    , Основы теории интерференционных систем в сейсморазведке. Часть 1. Теория волновой фильтрации. М.1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. НахамкинС.А.
    Интерференционные преобразования сейсмических полей. В кн.: Вопросы динамической теории распространения сейсмических волн. Вып.ХVII, Л., Наука1977. с 5–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ТроянВ.Н.
    Статистические методы обработки сейсмической информации при исследовании сложных сред. М., Недра, 1982.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ТэтэмР.Х.
    Многомерная фильтрация сейсмических данных. ТИИЭР: Пер. с англ., 1984, т.72, №10, с.147–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BliasE.
    2007. VSP wavefield separation: Wave-by-wave optimization approach. Geophysics, 72, p.T47–T55
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HarlanW.S., Claerbout, J.F., Rocca, F.
    , 1984. Signal/noise separation and velocity estimation. Geophysics, 49. p.1869–1880
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LandaE., Fomel, S., ReshefM.
    2008. Separation, imaging, and velocity analysis of seismic diffractions using migrated dip-angle gathers. SEG Las Vegas Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstract. p.2176–2180
    [Google Scholar]
  9. EsinovB.S., LitvyakovaO.O. KorolevA.E., SmirnovK.A., ShevchenkoA.A. LandaE.
    2017Reflected and scattered components extraction from migrated wave field. Abstracts, Geomodel XIX.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. NapalkovU.V., SerdobolskiiL.A.
    Basic of interfering system theory in seismic survey. Part I. Theory of wave filtering. M.1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. NahamkinS.A.
    Integration transforms of the seismic wavefields. In book: The questions of seismic wave propagation. XVII, 1977. p. 5–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. TroyanV.N.
    Statistical method of seismic information processing in complex media. M., Nedra, 1982
    [Google Scholar]
  13. TathamR.H.
    1984Multidimensional filtering of seismic data. IEEE72, N10. (in Russian) p. 147–160
    [Google Scholar]
  14. BliasE.
    2007. VSP wavefield separation: Wave-by-wave optimization approach. Geophysics, 72, p.T47–T55
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HarlanW.S., Claerbout, J.F., Rocca, F.
    , 1984. Signal/noise separation and velocity estimation. Geophysics, 49. p.1869–1880
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LandaE., Fomel, S., ReshefM.
    2008. Separation, imaging, and velocity analysis of seismic diffractions using migrated dip-angle gathers. SEG Las Vegas Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstract. p.2176–2180
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800311
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800311
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error