1887

Abstract

Summary

Geophysics makes it possible to distinguish the intervals of the geological section in the soil under of foundations, which undergo biogenic contamination and seasonal changes of hydrogeological conditions. The results of complex application of ground penetration radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) for revealing hydrogeological and biogenic factors influencing the state of sandy-argillaceous soils under of foundations are presented

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800458
2018-04-23
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ГорскаяВ.А.
    Инженерно-геологический анализ исторического аспекта освоения и контаминации подземного пространства Санкт-Петербурга. Автореферат диссертации на соискание ученой степени кандидата геолого-минералогических наук. СПб, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ДашкоР.Э., РуденкоЕ.С., НороваЛ.П.
    Ретроспективный анализ экологического состояния подземного пространства Санкт-Петербурга//«Наука в СПГГИ(ТУ)». СПб, 1998. Вып.2.-С.89–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ДашкоР.Э.
    Геотехника и подземная микробиота / Р.Э.Дашко, Д.Ю.Власов, А.В.Шидловская. СПб: Изд-во «ПИ Геореконструкция», 2014. 280 с.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Обследование технического состояния несущих строительных конструкций Санкт-Петербургской клинической больницы Российской академии наук. Технический отчет ООО НПП «Лидинг», 2004. -137с.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. МодинИ.Н., ШевнинВ.А. ИвановаС.А., БобачевА.А., БольшаковД.К., СафроновВ.С. и др.
    Геоэкологическое обследование предприятий нефтяной промышленности. Изд. “Руссо”, 511 с. 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ШевнинВ.А., РыжовА.А., Делгадо-РодригесО.
    Оценка петрофизических параметров грунтов по данным метода сопротивлений. Геофизика, # 4, 2006, с. 37–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Abdel Aal, G.Z., E.A.Atekwana, L.D.Slater, and E.A.Atekwana
    , 2004. Effects of microbial processes on electrolytic and interfacial electrical properties of unconsolidated sediments, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 (12), L12505, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020030
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020030 [Google Scholar]
  8. Atekwana, E., D. D.Werkema, and E.Atekwana
    . BIOGEOPHYSICS: THE EFFECTS OF MICROBIAL PROCESSES ON GEOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SHALLOW SUBSURFACE. Chapter 6, H.Vereecken (ed.), Applied Hydrogeophysics. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1:161–193, (2006).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Estella A.Atekwana, D.Dale Werkema, Jr., Joseph W.Duris, SilviaRossbach, Eliot A.Atekwana, William A.Sauck, Daniel P.Cassidy, JayMeans, and Franklyn D.Legall
    (2004). “In situ apparent conductivity measurements and microbial population distribution at a hydrocarbon contaminated site.” GEOPHYSICS, 69(1), 56–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Foster, K. R., and H. P.Schwan
    (1989), Dielectric-properties of tissues and biologicalmaterials—A critical review, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 17(1), 25 – 104.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pettinelli, E., G.Vannaroni, A.Cereti, A. R.Pisani, F.Paolucci, D.Del Vento, D.Dolfi, S.Riccioli, and F.Bella
    (2005), Laboratory investigations into the electromagnetic properties of magnetite/silica mixtures as Martian soil simulants, J. Geophys. Res., 110, E04013, doi:10.1029/2004JE002375.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JE002375 [Google Scholar]
  12. Sato, M., and H. M.Mooney
    (1960), The electrochemical mechanism of sulfide self-potential, Geophysics, 25(1), 226 – 249, doi:10.1190/1.1438689.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438689 [Google Scholar]
  13. Shevnin, V., Mousatov, A., Nakamura-Labastida, E., DelgadoRodriguez, O., Sanche-Osi, J., and Sanchez-Osio, H.
    , 2003, Study of pollution in airports with resistivity sounding: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Proceedings, 180–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GorskayaV.A.
    Inzhenerno-geologicheskij analiz istoricheskogo aspekta osvoeniya i kontaminacii podzemnogo prostranstva Sankt-Peterburga. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata geologo-mineralogicheskih nauk. SPb, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DashkoR.EH., RudenkoE.S., NorovaL.P.
    Retrospektivnyj analiz ehkologicheskogo sostoyaniya podzemnogo prostranstva Sankt-Peterburga//«Nauka v SPGGI(TU)». SPb, 1998. Vyp.2.-S.89–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DashkoR.EH.
    Geotekhnika i podzemnaya mikrobiota / R.EH.Dashko, D.YU.Vlasov, A.V.SHidlovskaya. SPb: Izd-vo «PI Georekonstrukciya», 2014. 280 s
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Obsledovanie tekhnicheskogo sostoyaniya nesushchih stroitel'nyh konstrukcij Sankt-Peterburgskoj klinicheskoj bol’nicy Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Tekhnicheskij otchet OOO NPP «Liding», 2004. -137s.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ModinI.N., SHevninV.A. IvanovaS.A., BobachevA.A., Bol'shakovD.K., SafronovV.S.
    i dr. Geoehkologicheskoe obsledovanie predpriyatij neftyanoj promyshlennosti. Izd. “Russo”, 511 s. 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SHevninV.A., RyzhovA.A., Delgado-RodrigesO.
    Ocenka petrofizicheskih parametrov gruntov po dannym metoda soprotivlenij. Geofizika, # 4, 2006, s. 37–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Abdel Aal, G.Z., E.A.Atekwana, L.D.Slater, and E.A.Atekwana
    , 2004. Effects of microbial processes on electrolytic and interfacial electrical properties of unconsolidated sediments, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 (12), L12505, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020030
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020030 [Google Scholar]
  21. Atekwana, E., D. D.Werkema, and E.Atekwana
    . BIOGEOPHYSICS: THE EFFECTS OF MICROBIAL PROCESSES ON GEOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SHALLOW SUBSURFACE. Chapter 6, H.Vereecken (ed.), Applied Hydrogeophysics. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1:161–193, (2006).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Estella A.Atekwana, D.Dale Werkema, Jr., Joseph W.Duris, SilviaRossbach, Eliot A.Atekwana, William A.Sauck, Daniel P.Cassidy, JayMeans, and Franklyn D.Legall
    (2004). “In situ apparent conductivity measurements and microbial population distribution at a hydrocarbon contaminated site.” GEOPHYSICS, 69(1), 56–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Foster, K. R., and H. P.Schwan
    (1989), Dielectric-properties of tissues and biologicalmaterials— A critical review, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 17(1), 25 – 104.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pettinelli, E., G.Vannaroni, A.Cereti, A. R.Pisani, F.Paolucci, D.Del Vento, D.Dolfi, S.Riccioli, and F.Bella
    (2005), Laboratory investigations into the electromagnetic properties of magnetite/silica mixtures as Martian soil simulants, J. Geophys. Res., 110, E04013, doi:10.1029/2004JE002375.
    https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JE002375 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sato, M., and H. M.Mooney
    (1960), The electrochemical mechanism of sulfide self-potential, Geophysics, 25(1), 226 – 249, doi:10.1190/1.1438689.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438689 [Google Scholar]
  26. Shevnin, V., Mousatov, A., Nakamura-Labastida, E., DelgadoRodriguez, O., Sanche-Osi, J., and Sanchez-Osio, H.
    , 2003, Study of pollution in airports with resistivity sounding: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Proceedings, 180–189.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800458
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800458
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error