1887

Abstract

Summary

Landslide is one geological disaster with a high risk that often occurs in Central Java Province, including in the Loano Area, Purworejo District. .Today there are many people in Loano who dwell in areas prone to landslide. However, it is necessary to conduct integrative research activities as a form of disaster mitigation to reduce the landslide risk. Research conducted in the form of remote sensing, geological mapping and GIS (Geographic Information System) analysis. Remote sensing observation shows that the factors control the Landslide are the presence of non vegetation in the southeast and west side of the areas, the slope (<15O), less crystalline rocks, geological structure, and hydrothermal alteration minerals.The lithology is composed of 4 rock units: basaltic andesite, andesite, tuffaceous sandstone and andesite breccia. The alteration zone lies in the unit of andesite lava lithology. The various clay minerals minerals in the form of illite, smectite, and kaolinite are the result of hydrothermal alteration which can be classified as an argillic type. There are 10 points of landslide prone zone. The zone is characterized by a slope above 15o and a high alteration level. Highfall rate of rainfall (131 – 241mm/month) in Kulonprogo area also believed control the landslide.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800372
2018-04-09
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abubakar, A. J., Hashim, M. and Pour, A., B.
    , 2016, Using LANDSAT 8 (OLI) Remote Sensing Data to Map Lithology and Mineralogy for Geothermal Resource Exploration, Proceedings of Asian Conference on Remote Sensing
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik Kulonprogo
    , 2017, Kabupaten Kulonprogo dalam Angka 2016, Pohon Cahaya Publisher, Yogyakarta.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BMKG
    , 2008, Curah Hujan dan Potensi Gerakan Tanah, without publisher
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Best, Myron, G.
    2003. Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology: Second Edition. Melbourne: Blackwell Science Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Corbett, G,J., T.M.Leach
    . 1996. Southwest Pacific Rim gold/copper systems: structure, alteration, and mineralization. A workshop presented for the Society of Exploration Geochemists at Townville, 145pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hobbs, B. E, et al.
    1976. An Outline of Structural Geology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Idrus, A., Warmada, I.W., Putri, R.I.
    ,2013. Mineralisasi Emas di Gunung Gupit, Magelang, Jawa Tengah: Sebuah Penemuan Baru Prospek Emas Tipe Epitermal Sulfidasi Tinggi Pada Rangkaian Pegunungan Kulon Progo-Menoreh. Annual Enginering Seminar 2013Universitas Gadjah Mada.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. McPhie, J, et al.
    1993. Volcanic Textures: A Guide to The Interpretation of Textures In Volcanic Rocks. Tasmania: Centre for Ore Depoit and Exploration Studies University of Tasmania.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mubekti, Alhasanah F.
    , 2008, Mitigasi Daerah Rawan Tanah Longsor Menggunakan Teknik Pemodelan Sistem Infoemasi Geografis; Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Sumedang Utara dan Sumedang Selatan, Journal of Teknik Lingkungan, pp 121–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ragan, D. M.
    1968. Structural Geology: An Introduction to Geometrical Technques, Second Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sabins, F. F.
    , 1999, Remote sensing for mineral exploration, Ore Geology Reviews, 14, pp 157 – 183
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800372
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800372
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error