1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. EAGE-HAGI 1st Asia Pacific Meeting on Near Surface Geoscience and Engineering
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

In this study, we derived crustal properties and shear wave velocity structures from analysis of teleseismic receiver function using Neighbourhoods Algorithm in the different geological units in Central Java. The results present here are the estimates of shear wave velocity models beneath 6 stations and the model of thickness of layer each geological unit. We observed the Moho depth at Central Java is about 22 to 38 km. In southern Central Java, the receiver function indicate a middle crustal low velocity zone, as Merapi Lawu Anomaly (MLA). The conversion Ps phase of the subducting Indo-Australian Plate is observed at several station at around 8.0 to 10.0 s. Several station that show high complexity data of receiver function require further study. They include stations at Quaternary Volcanoes and The Central Deppresion Zone of Java.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800415
2018-04-09
2024-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800415
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Satyana, Awang
    . 2007. Proceedings, IPA. Thirty-First Annual Convention and Exhibition, May 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ligorria, J. and Ammon, C.
    1999. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol 89, 1395–1400.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassidi, John F.
    1995. Can. J. Earth Sci.32: 938–951.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Van, BemmelenR.W.
    1970. The Geology of Indonesia 2nd Edition. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Sambridge, M.
    1999. Geophys. J. Int.138, 2, 479–494, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1999.00876.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Yu, Y., JianguoSong, Kelly H.Liu, and Stephen S.Gao
    . 2015. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 10.1002/2014JB011610.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Waltham, D., RobertHall Helen R.Smyth Cynthia J.Ebinger
    . 2008. Geological Society of America Special Paper 436, p. 11–26. 10.1130/2008.2436(02).
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Wölbern, Ingo., GeorgRümpker
    . 2016. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences115, 69–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Wagner, D., Koulakov, I., Rabbel, W., Luehr, B., Wittwer, A., Kopp, H., Bohm, M., and Asch, G.
    2007. Geophysical Journal International, 170(2):923–932.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800415
Loading
A Comparison of Tele-seismic Receiver Function in the Different Geological Units in Central Java
Conference Proceedings 2018, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201800415
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800415
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800415
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error