1887

Abstract

Summary

Least squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) is often formulated as an iterative updating process, where estimating the gradient of the misfit function is necessary. Traditional time domain shot profile LSRTM is computationally expensive because computing the gradient involves solving the two-way wave equation several times in every iteration. To reduce the computational effort of LSRTM, we propose to implement frequency domain LSRTM using double plane wave (DPW) data with sparse frequency sampling and sparse plane wave sampling. Theoretically, frequency sampling and plane wave sampling used in migration should obey the Nyqusit theorem. Otherwise, the well-known wrap-around artifacts and linear artifacts might contaminate images. In this research, we demonstrate that images with correct reflector amplitudes and reasonable resolution can be achieved even if frequency sampling and plane wave sampling are larger than that determined by the Nyquist theorem. The artifacts generated due to undersampling in frequency and plane wave can be effectively suppressed during iterations. Using sparse frequency and plane wave sampling for DPW LSRTM greatly reduces the number of wavefield computations. We show that the computational efficiency can be improved by an order of magnitude.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800651
2018-06-11
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dai, W., and G. T.Schuster
    , 2013, Plane-wave least-squares reverse-time migration: Geophysics, 78, no. 4, S165–S177, doi: 10.1190/geo2012‑0377.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0377.1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Dong, S., J.Cai, M.Guo, S.Suh, Z.Zhang, B.Wang, and Z.Li
    , 2012, Least-squares reverse time migration: towards true amplitude Imaging and improving the resolution: 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1425–1429, doi: 10.1190/segam2012‑1488.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-1488.1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Etgen, J. T.
    , 2005, How many angles do we really need for delayed-shot migration?: 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1985–1988, doi: 10.1190/1.2148097.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2148097 [Google Scholar]
  4. Mulder, W. A., and R. E.Plessix
    , 2004, How to choose a subset of frequencies in frequency-domain finite-difference migration: Geophysical Journal International, 158, no. 3, 801–812, doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑246X.2004.02336.x.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02336.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang, Y., J.Sun, C.Notfors, S. H.Gray, L.Chernis, and J.Young
    , 2005, Delayed-shot 3D depth migration: Geophysics, 70, no. 5, E21–E28, doi: 10.1190/1.2057980.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2057980 [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhao, Z., M. K.Sen, and P. L.Stoffa
    , 2016, Double-plane-wave reverse time migration in the frequency domain: Geophysics, 81, no. 5, S367–S382, doi: 10.1190/geo2015‑0687.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0687.1 [Google Scholar]
  7. , 2017a, Double plane-wave reverse-time migration: Geophysical Prospecting, doi: 10.1111/1365‑2478.12507.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12507 [Google Scholar]
  8. , 2017b, Reciprocity and double plane-wave migration: Geophysics, 82, no. 6, S453–S466, doi: 10.1190/geo2017‑0161.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0161.1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao, Z., M. K.Sen, P. L.Stoffa, and H.Zhu
    , 2015, Double Plane Wave Least Squares Reverse Time Migration: 85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4170–4174, doi: 10.1190/segam2015‑5924229.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2015-5924229.1 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800651
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800651
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error