1887

Abstract

Summary

Shallow absorptive bodies are an ongoing challenge in velocity model building due to the dispersion and attenuation they cause to seismic data: ignoring absorption in model building can lead to erroneous velocities and poor imaging. Ray-tracing-based tomographic inversions for attenuation can perform well, but typically provide lower resolution than a full waveform approach. Also, the method carries inherent drawbacks in the near surface, where absorptive bodies are often at their most influential, due to acquisition limitations. This work highlights visco-acoustic full-waveform inversion (Q-FWI) as a method for estimating high-resolution velocity and attenuation models. We present a very large, real data, case study where Q-FWI has been applied to ~36,000 km2 of 3D, narrow azimuth, variable-depth streamer data over the North Viking Graben region of the Norwegian North Sea. The results delineate both known and previously unknown absorptive bodies of varying size and strength. Our results show that Q-FWI can invert for high-resolution velocity and attenuation models, providing superior imaging using an attenuation compensating pre-stack depth migration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800681
2018-06-11
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hak, B. and W.A.Mulder
    [2011] Seismic attenuation with causality. Geophys. J. Int., 184, 439–451.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hung, B., Xin, K.F., Birdus, S. and J.Sun
    [2008] 3-D Tomographic Amplitude Inversion for Compensating Transmission Losses in the Overburden. 70th EAGE Conference & Exhibitions, Extended Abstracts, H004.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Malinowski, M., Operto, S. and A.Ribodetti
    [2011] High-resolution seismic attenuation imaging from wide-aperture onshore data by visco-acoustic frequency-domain full-waveform inversion. Geophys. J. Int., 186, 1179–1204.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Plessix, R.-E., Stopin, A., Kuehl, H., Goh, V. and K.Overgaag
    [2016] Visco-acoustic Full Waveform Inversion. 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibitions, Extended Abstracts, Tu SRS2 04.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Robertsson, J., Blanch, J. and W.Symes
    [1994] Viscoelastic finite-difference modeling. Geophysics, 59(9), 1444–1456.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Stopin, A., Plessix, R.-E., Kuehl, H., Goh, V. and K.Overgaag
    [2016] Application of Visco-acoustic Full Waveform Inversion for Gas Cloud Imaging and Velocity Model Building. 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibitions, Extended Abstracts, Tu STZ0 12.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Xiao, B., Kotova, N., Bretherton, S., Ratcliffe, A., Duval, G., Page, C. and O.Pape
    [2016] An offshore Gabon full-waveform inversion case study. Interpretation, 4(4), SU25–SU39.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Xie, Y., Sun, J., Zhang, Y. and J.Zhou
    [2015] Compensating for visco-acoustic effects in TTI reverse time migration. 85th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3996–4001.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhou, J., Wu, X., Teng, K.H., Xie, Y., Lefeuvre, F., Anstey, I. and L.Sirgue
    [2013] FWI-guided Q tomography and Q-PSDM for imaging in the presence of complex gas clouds, a case study from offshore Malaysia. 83rd SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 4765–4769.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800681
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800681
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error