1887

Abstract

Summary

Accurate estimation of CSEM measurement uncertainty is required for quantitative analysis in inversion, survey optimization, and feasibility studies. We describe a practical uncertainty model that robustly handles measured data even in a geology that gives rise to dramatic amplitude features. We explain how such features arise from interference effects, which clarifies CSEM shallow water wave propagation phenomenology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800754
2018-06-11
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amundsen, L., L.O.Løseth, R.Mittet, S.Ellingsrud, and B.Ursin
    [2006] Decomposition of electromagnetic fields into upgoing and downgoing components, Geophysics, 71, no. 5, G211
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker, N.D., J.P.Morten, and D.V.Shantsev
    [2012] Optimizing EM data acquisition for continental shelf exploration, The Leading Edge, 31(11), 1276
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Løseth, L.O., and B.Ursin
    [2007] Electromagnetic fields in planarly layered anisotropic media, Geophysical Journal International, 170, 44
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mittet, R., and J.P.Morten
    [2012] Detection and imaging sensitivity of the marine CSEM method, Geophysics, 77, no. 6, E411
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Nordskag, J.I. and L.Amundsen
    [2007] Asymptotic airwave modeling for marine controlled-source electromagnetic surveying, Geophysics, 72, no. 6, F249
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800754
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800754
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error